Clement I added a little section right at the beginning on car/cdr and others.
Tx
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Clément Bera wrote:
> p.3
> simpliciyty -> simplicity
>
> p.4
> we will have the define their semantics.
> -> to define ? I am not sure I understand the
Since I was born in lisp it looks natural to me so I will imporve the cdr use
tx for this feedback
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Clément Bera wrote:
> p.3
> simpliciyty -> simplicity
>
> p.4
> we will have the define their semantics.
> -> to define ? I am not sure I
Yes there!
Tx in advance for copy edition.
Stef
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Cyril Ferlicot
wrote:
>
> On dim. 18 mars 2018 at 16:24, Sean P. DeNigris
> wrote:
>>
>> Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote
>> > I would like to get feedback and fix
>> >
On dim. 18 mars 2018 at 16:24, Sean P. DeNigris
wrote:
> Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote
> > I would like to get feedback and fix
> > what can be fixed.
>
> Is there a public link to the source? It would be easiest to submit fixes
> via PRs instead of ML :)
>
>
Probably
Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote
> I would like to get feedback and fix
> what can be fixed.
Is there a public link to the source? It would be easiest to submit fixes
via PRs instead of ML :)
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
p.3
simpliciyty -> simplicity
p.4
we will have the define their semantics.
-> to define ? I am not sure I understand the sentence
p.10
and may converted on the fly
-> and maybe ? I am not sure I understand the sentence
At the beginning I started to read and understood nothing, then I read a 24
Hi
I finally decided to release the booklet I wrote about implementing a
minischeme in Pharo.
I did not announce it yet because I would like to get feedback and fix
what can be fixed.
https://files.pharo.org/books-pdfs/booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo/2018-03-17-MiniScheme.pdf
Stef