Re: [Pharo-users] Performance vs Ruby performance

2016-09-09 Thread Vitor Medina Cruz
Thank you for the answers! On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > It does not matter. When it comes to performance the workflow is always > the same whatever the language you use. > > 1. Profile the code see where it consume most CPU cycles > 2. Can you improve the code to re

Re: [Pharo-users] Performance vs Ruby performance

2016-09-07 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
It does not matter. When it comes to performance the workflow is always the same whatever the language you use. 1. Profile the code see where it consume most CPU cycles 2. Can you improve the code to remove unnecessary processing ? You will be surprised how many times its your code and not the lan

Re: [Pharo-users] Performance vs Ruby performance

2016-09-07 Thread Clément Bera
What ruby runtime exactly ? The standard ruby interpreter, rubinius, JRuby ? What do you mean by performance ? Smallest time to run long computation ? Latency for web servers ? Pauses in real time applications ? The standard ruby interpreter is really slow (likely ~100 times slower than the Pharo

[Pharo-users] Performance vs Ruby performance

2016-09-07 Thread Vitor Medina Cruz
Hello, How is Pharo compared with Ruby in terms of performance? Has someone done some comparison benchmark? If yes, that was done with other platforms? Regards, VItor