On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Peter Uhnák wrote:
> Check which versions are bold when you open the package. Because when I
>> use gitfiletree it usually shows me that the latest few versions are not
>> loaded (they are in bold) but I am anyway on the latest one.
>
>
> As I've said, it shows
Le 24/07/2015 13:26, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Thierry Goubier
mailto:thierry.goub...@gmail.com>> wrote:
2015-07-24 13:19 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák mailto:i.uh...@gmail.com>>:
I'm not sure how is Pharo 4 related (I do all dev in 5 now).
I sho
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Peter Uhnák wrote:
>
> Alex, would you be able to show something with Roassal? It would be really
>> nice to see the overall git history graph overlaid with the graph of the
>> history of the selected package.
>>
>
> Interesting that if someone else nee
2015-07-24 13:18 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák :
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Thierry Goubier <
> thierry.goub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 2015-07-24 13:04 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák :
>>
>>>
>>> Alex, would you be able to show something with Roassal? It would be
really nice to see the overa
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Thierry Goubier
wrote:
>
>
> 2015-07-24 13:19 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák :
>
>> I'm not sure how is Pharo 4 related (I do all dev in 5 now).
>>>
>>
>> I should update DynaCASE docs, if that's where you got that impression...
>>
>
> Yes, from the DynaCASE doc, I believe
2015-07-24 13:19 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák :
> I'm not sure how is Pharo 4 related (I do all dev in 5 now).
>>
>
> I should update DynaCASE docs, if that's where you got that impression...
>
Yes, from the DynaCASE doc, I believed you were in Pharo4 :)
Thierry
>
> I'm not sure how is Pharo 4 related (I do all dev in 5 now).
>
I should update DynaCASE docs, if that's where you got that impression...
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Thierry Goubier
wrote:
>
>
> 2015-07-24 13:04 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák :
>
>>
>> Alex, would you be able to show something with Roassal? It would be
>>> really nice to see the overall git history graph overlaid with the graph of
>>> the history of the selected packag
2015-07-24 13:04 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák :
>
> Alex, would you be able to show something with Roassal? It would be really
>> nice to see the overall git history graph overlaid with the graph of the
>> history of the selected package.
>>
>
> Interesting that if someone else needs it I have no problem
> Alex, would you be able to show something with Roassal? It would be really
> nice to see the overall git history graph overlaid with the graph of the
> history of the selected package.
>
Interesting that if someone else needs it I have no problem writing Roassal
scripts etc, but when I need it I
Hi Peter,
here is my analysis on DynaCASE-PeterUhnak.147.
When going through the history on git, many of the merges do not register
as belonging to the DynaCASE package (a git commit belongs to a package
when it modify something inside the package directory or modify the version
file, I don't rem
>
>
>> Sorry for the lack of support on windows. You'll have to wait for
>>> libcgit.
>>
>>
>> Is there an estimated timeline when this will be? (weeks, months, years,
>> ...?)
>>
>
> I don't know; the lib has been included in the Pharo vm for a long time,
> and I remember talks about having it fo
Hi Peter,
2015-07-24 10:47 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák :
> Check which versions are bold when you open the package. Because when I
>> use gitfiletree it usually shows me that the latest few versions are not
>> loaded (they are in bold) but I am anyway on the latest one.
>
>
> As I've said, it shows me
>
> Check which versions are bold when you open the package. Because when I
> use gitfiletree it usually shows me that the latest few versions are not
> loaded (they are in bold) but I am anyway on the latest one.
As I've said, it shows me that I am on the latest version.
Maybe this happens to
2015-07-24 9:21 GMT+02:00 Jan Blizničenko :
> Yes it is.
>
> I personally never ran into such ghost changes when I was using
> gitfiletree.
> This might be also useful information: We are two contributors and Peter
> uses GitFileTree but I use FileTree because GitFileTree crashes all the
> time
>
Yes it is.
I personally never ran into such ghost changes when I was using gitfiletree.
This might be also useful information: We are two contributors and Peter
uses GitFileTree but I use FileTree because GitFileTree crashes all the time
on Win 7 (
http://forum.world.st/Gitfiletree-unstable-on-Win
Peter, is this the dynacase at https://github.com/dynacase/dynacase ?
Thierry
Le 24/07/2015 02:29, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Thierry Goubier
mailto:thierry.goub...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Peter,
no, I don't think you fucked up your gitfiletree metadata. B
Check which versions are bold when you open the package. Because when I use
gitfiletree it usually shows me that the latest few versions are not loaded
(they are in bold) but I am anyway on the latest one.
Uko
> On 24 Jul 2015, at 02:29, Peter Uhnák wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Thierry Goubier wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> no, I don't think you fucked up your gitfiletree metadata. But the
> explanation is a bit complex.
>
> First thing is that you are looking at a git generated metadata... So what
> you're asking for (regenerating from git) is
Hi Peter,
no, I don't think you fucked up your gitfiletree metadata. But the
explanation is a bit complex.
First thing is that you are looking at a git generated metadata... So
what you're asking for (regenerating from git) is already what you are
looking at :)
Second is that gitfiletree w
Hi,
it seems that I managed to completely fuck up my gitfiletree metadata...
e.g.:
Ancestors: DynaCASE-PeterUhnak.148, DynaCASE-PeterUhnak.93,
DynaCASE-PeterUhnak.144, DynaCASE-PeterUhnak.146, DynaCASE-PeterUhnak.92,
DynaCASE-PeterUhnak.142, DynaCASE-PeterUhnak.140, DynaCASE-PeterUhnak.138,
DynaC
21 matches
Mail list logo
