Are there any objections to making such a change? I don't think it
has any BC implications.
It will have BC implications ;) Because it would finally allow to pass
multiple parameters to a program
when in safe mode...
Stefan
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
Hi
Some maybe already recognized it, for the others: There's DTD-Validation
in domxml available now.
Just for the record, some examples how to use it.
$xmldoc = xmldocfile(xhtml1.xhtml,DOMXML_LOAD_PARSING,$error);
will parse the file as before, but gives you more meaningfull
errormessages in
Christian Stocker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi
Some maybe already recognized it, for the others: There's DTD-Validation
in domxml available now.
Excellent! Can't wait to try it out.
However, I still have one very small request that maybe you can add
while you are in the xmldoc
At 16:46 07.06.2002, Joseph Tate wrote:
How much of C has been reused, and reused and reused again? There is no oo
in stdlib.
Ah come on there is no oo in c.
You should have asked for C++ and STL (and that is very much of code reuse
even though its pro is its main foe: it is so much of reuse
I have a example.html
---
script
function add()
{
var res=0;
for(x=0;x3;x++)res=res+parseFloat(example.text[x].value);
example.result.value=res;
}
/script
html
form name=example action=show.php
input type=text name=text value=1br
input type=text name=text
Is it possible to instantiate an object from one of my c++ shared libraries
(goo.so) and then call methods on that object?
How efficient is PHP's way of doing it? (if possible)
Also, can I pass things like the querystring and form data into that
instantiated object?
Thanks for any response!
Hello all,
I need to write a molecular visualization extension for PHP to complete a
project I am working on. It will have to work somewhat like GD by creating a
resource, having other functions operate on that resource, and then output
an image. I have trouble finding a good explanation of
There is no transpartent way of creating a c++ object from php. What you can do
is create a php extension that will proxy the calls to your c++ object. Once
you do that you can pass anything into your c++ class (querystring).
take a look at ext/* in the souce distribution.
- brad
--- Kevin
The second problem is that I don't see it working with nested classes.
Is it good enough to only have this work with classes in the global
scope?
I am not really familiar with nested classes; is it because
you don't know the name of the file in which a nested class
is located?
http://www.php.net/manual/en/zend.variables.resource.php will be a starting
point.
Basically you want to do this:
1) Create a destruction handler for your resource:
void my_destruction_handler(zend_rsrc_list_entry *rsrc TSRMLS_DC) {
}
2) Register the destruction handler:
le_resource =
Something went wrong in the format of my message!
It should read:
ZEND_FETCH_RESOURCE(resource_ptr, resource_struct *, resource_id, -1,
resource, le_resource);
The first argument will be returned to the caller, that will be your
resource identification.
The second argument is a pointer to
Sascha Schumann wrote:
I noticed this risk long time before and I think it's a kind of
security fix as Sascha's comment, isn't it?
That depends on your viewpoint.
From my perspective, this is not urgent. It is not like an
attacker can gain access to the server, it just
Yes, I did ask Stig who's code it is and he said
it was propably left commented by accident.
And I asked about this on php-dev a while ago..without
anybody bothering to reply.
So, what is the deep meaning for that to be different
from what our manual
It is actually my code and the uncommenting had to do with a bug in
Apache. The deep meaning being that leaving this code in there will make
all authentication break for some versions of Apache.
-Rasmus
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Yes, I did ask Stig who's code it is and
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
It is actually my code and the uncommenting had to do with a bug in
Apache. The deep meaning being that leaving this code in there will make
all authentication break for some versions of Apache.
Ah..nice to get that information now. Why didn't you
Ah..nice to get that information now. Why didn't you reply to
my question about this when I asked it on this list?
I don't recall seeing the question.
And I really didn't commit it without testing, it works fine
with Apache 1.3.24, so what might that apache version be with
Uh Jani, how much research did you do on this one? Don't you think there
is a reason that this code is commented out?
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
sniperThu Jun 13 18:13:58 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/php4/sapi/apache mod_php4.c
Log:
@- Fixed bug with
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Ah..nice to get that information now. Why didn't you reply to
my question about this when I asked it on this list?
I don't recall seeing the question.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-devm=101952354225480w=2
And I really didn't
I don't know offhand which versions are broken. I'd have to do some
research. Hence my suggestion that more research is needed before blindly
uncommenting something like this.
It's also good practice to add comments to the code
about things like this so that people shouldn't have
http://www.php.net/manual/en/zend.variables.resource.php
- Im sure thats improved alot since I first read it :)
regards
alan
fabwash wrote:
Something went wrong in the format of my message!
It should read:
ZEND_FETCH_RESOURCE(resource_ptr, resource_struct *, resource_id, -1,
resource,
You guys aren't the only ones who have to deal with the reprocussions
of changing the register_globals default...
(I've already sent the reporter in the right direction and closed
this bug, but something tells me this won't be the last time we hear
about this.)
-aaron
- Forwarded message
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I don't know offhand which versions are broken. I'd have to do some
research. Hence my suggestion that more research is needed before blindly
uncommenting something like this.
It's also good practice to add comments to the code
about
22 matches
Mail list logo
