Re: [PHP-DEV] Seeking Comments - Regarding header()

2002-06-23 Thread Steve Meyers
Chris Shiflett wrote: > I have a few sites where I deliberately violate the HTTP spec in this > way to get around a bug in IE (I know, shame on me). I've been using > relative URLs in a "Location" header for years with no crashes that I > know of. > > There must be something unique in your confi

[PHP-DEV] Fixes/suggestions for PHP 4.2.2

2002-06-23 Thread Troels Arvin
Hello, If PHP 4.2.2 is going to be released, then I have some suggestions: I believe that the following changes to HEAD should be MFH'ed: http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php4/ext/gmp/config.m4?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php4/ext/standard/link.c?r1=1.37&r2=1.38 http://cvs.php.net/diff

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why new modules are under php4 source tree?

2002-06-23 Thread Yasuo Ohgaki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > > >>I just realized mime_magic module is under php4/ext >> >>It should be pear/pecl/mime_magic since it's new >>module. > > > As PECL doesn't work for windows users yet, it's NOT a good idea to put > modules there. Once it

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why new modules are under php4 source tree?

2002-06-23 Thread Yasuo Ohgaki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > > >>I just realized mime_magic module is under php4/ext >> >>It should be pear/pecl/mime_magic since it's new >>module. > > > As PECL doesn't work for windows users yet, it's NOT a good idea to put > modules there. Once it

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why new modules are under php4 source tree?

2002-06-23 Thread derick
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > I just realized mime_magic module is under php4/ext > > It should be pear/pecl/mime_magic since it's new > module. As PECL doesn't work for windows users yet, it's NOT a good idea to put modules there. Once it is ready, we can do that... but for now e