[PHP-DEV] Re: dahlia.dasmoped.net daily run output

these are still being sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (perhaps the mail configuration needs to get updated?) jim On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 03:06:27AM +0200, Charlie Root wrote: > > Removing stale files from /var/preserve: > > Cleaning out old system announcements: > > Removing stale files from /var/

[PHP-DEV] Re: sticky perms in CVS?

Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I the only one who is getting their files chmod'ed to read-only > every time I do a CVS commit? > In particular, main/user_streams.c keeps doing this which is quite > annoying - is there some setting on the server side that affects this? > (and do we wan

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: REPOST: PHP 4.2.3 Released

Stefan Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Showed up fine before > > That is strange because I did not receive it over the list > and it is not in the php-dev web archive. http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.dev&article=88018 jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To

[PHP-DEV] Re: Problems with PHP.net MX

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Will we lose the mail or not? That is my _only_ mail right now, that would > be so bad :-/ except for a small handful of messages that already bounced because of a little slip-up during the transition, all the messages should make it through, possibly with some delays.

[PHP-DEV] Re: Problems with PHP.net MX

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Are there any problems with PHP.net MX? I should host a MX Backup if > it is > needed. It looks I dont receive my mails anymore, well it takes few > hours. > (4h...). mail handling is being transitioned to a different machine (and the machine that used

Re: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

Yasuo Ohgaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marcus B?rger wrote: >> We already had some discussion on some IF statements in ini >> files already. I guess we might call to another mail thread here >> and hope we find a volunteer. I will not invent any work here since >> that would be totally useless.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] RE: [PHP-DEV] oo != php

Dan Hardiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unless Im missing the mark - for which I appologise. The PHP Group as a > whole seems to have mixed feelings on this issue - could there be some > form of concensus so that I (and many others on this list) can work out if > the requested extra functionalit

[PHP-DEV] Re: Sorry! Re: [PHP-DEV] Fwd: REJECTED: <5.1.0.14.2.20020607225328.03df2740@127.0.0.1>

Richard S. Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sorry abt that .. an overzealous SPAM filter triggered on your three > exclamation points . in your SUBJECT > > should be fixed now :-S you should further fix your spam system to bounce to the SMTP envelope sender instead of whatever broken

Re: [PHP-DEV] Snapshots not build correctly..

Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 09:25 PM 6/5/2002 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote: >>On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote: >> >> >At 11:35 PM 6/4/2002 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote: >> > >> >> The source snapshots don't have the bison/flex generated >> >> files anymore..why is that?

[PHP-DEV] Re: Bidirectional Pipe

Kim Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * am I correct that there isn't a way to do this in PHP at the moment? nope. http://php.net/proc_open jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] one of the php.net machines is down

one of the php.net machines (the one that handles @php.net mail, bugs.php.net, hosts.php.net, and various other services) is currently down. we're waiting on word from the folks hosting the machine to find out what's up. hopefully things will be back up and running soon, but it could take until mo

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [Gallery-users] can't create albums (fwd)

James E. Flemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps this broke it: (it looks like the most recent > change to mkdir()) > > http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php4/ext/standard/file.c?r1=1.203&r2=1.204&ty=u > > I am looking into it. passing a pointer to a mode_t (&mode) to zend_parse_parameters(), whi

Re: [PHP-DEV] config.w32.h...registry configuration

Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We could add it. I just hope people wouldn't start demanding control > structures in there to start selectively loading other files... let's just hope that by then, someone realizes we already have a scanner and parser that handles such a language close

[PHP-DEV] Re: mirrors.inc/countries.inc - Where is it?

Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could somebody please tell me where I can find those files in CVS? I > did a checkout of phpweb and then looked for *mirror* and *countr*, but > couldn't find it. Is it in a different module? they're generated files, not under cvs control. they just

[PHP-DEV] specifying smtp server on win32 via 5th mail() parameter

as suggested at http://bugs.php.net/10629, the patch below would allow win32 users to specify the smtp server to use as the 5th parameter to the mail() function. (the 'pass random options to my sendmail program' parameter on unix systems.) any thoughts? (maybe it's better to just use ini_set()?)

Re: [PHP-DEV] bugs: try newer version (?)

James E. Flemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for the confusion. I was not implying in any way that _existing_ > bugs be automatically marked as "Try Newer Version", I was suggesting > that perhaphs _new_ bugs be marked that way if they are submitted with > a (very) old release. That seems to

[PHP-DEV] Re: snaps.php.net

Marko Karppinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Even though no sane person can dispute the fact that the frantic > pace of PHP3 development warrants fresh snapshot of the venerable > scripting environment every three hours, many people feel that > the development and especially QA efforts on the 4.2

[PHP-DEV] Re: CVS Account Request

Andrew Heebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would like to contribute and help with existing PEAR modules you need to fill out the form at http://www.php.net/cvs-php.php jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] some php.net maintenance this weekend.

i'll be shifting around some of the php.net services this weekend (particularly handling of @php.net mail addresses, and bugs.php.net), so don't be alarmed if you're unable to reach some of the php.net sites for a few hours while the dns switches over. (in theory, there won't be any interruption

[PHP-DEV] php-dev was stuck.

in setting up php-dev to reject most types of attachments, particularly text/html, (like php-general does), i accidently caused the php-dev traffic to get stuck. everything sent in the last day should start trickling through in the next few hours. (including what will no doubt be at least a few "i

[PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: php4 /sapi/apache config.m4 /sapi/apache2filter config.m4

Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sniper Fri Apr 12 18:59:07 2002 EDT > > Modified files: >/php4/sapi/apache config.m4 >/php4/sapi/apache2filterconfig.m4 > Log: > - Added checks to prevent building the DSO with wrong configure option. woohoo! bu

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The PHP Platform

Ken Egervari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Usually that "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" attritude is just the > thing to make a technology less and less useful and eventually it'll > be antiquated. Eseentially, it is already is. Don't get me wrong, > just because it's out of date doesn't mean i

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The PHP Platform

Ken Egervari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I actually find your post rather immature as well assuming that I just want > free custom tools. I think you need yourself need think to think about > software reuse and improving productivity. It's an important software issue > now as it was 20 years ag

[PHP-DEV] Re: The PHP Platform

Ken Egervari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ ... ] because it really only solves the needs of HTML developers > that need some dynamic functionality to their sites. [ ... ] what's wrong with that? more generally, why do you expect the developers of php to provide the tools that you want, instead

[PHP-DEV] Re: Let's fork GD!

Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that we roll the GD library into PHP, apply the various > outstanding patches and default to building from the bundled library much > like we do with MySQL. I think GD is a popular enough extension for PHP > that it would be extremely cool to

[PHP-DEV] Re: modified base64

Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After (v)spprintf i have another modified function here: base64url_(en|de)code > > I sometimes transmit binary data or thinks like session ids over http. when > using base64 the problem is in the chars '+', '/' and '='. So i changed base64 > to use '-',

[PHP-DEV] should ZEND_FETCH_RESOURCE return false or null on failure?

http://bugs.php.net/15153 shows the resulting fun from this distinction. yes, the user should be checking the result of opendir(). unfortunately, the examples in the documentation didn't. (which i've fixed now.) jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: h

[PHP-DEV] ext/standard/dl.c: DL_ERROR()

is DL_ERROR() something that is normally defined? the patch to add Mac OS X support changed the GET_DL_ERROR() macro to call this instead of dlerror(), which broke the build for me on debian/unstable. jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.ph

[PHP-DEV] 4.1.3?

i know that 4.2.0 is due in a few weeks, but would it be worth kicking out a 4.1.3 that has support for the recent apache 2 release? (or just pushing up the 4.2.0 release? is there anything holding back the release besides some arbitrary timeline?) jim -- PHP Development Mailing List

[PHP-DEV] RELEASE_PROCESS text file

we should either ditch this file, or update it to reflect the current process. (i'd almost prefer we just replace it with an entirely new document, perhaps based on derick's email[1], so we can have the document not be GPL'd, which is just silly.) one way i'd amend the process, relating to the us

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h

Andrew Sitnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RL> Yup, as far as I can see it is a completely useless function other than > RL> the fact that it reads an entire file into a string. This is actually > RL> something we should add, but it should be a generic load_file() or > RL> str_file() or some ot

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h

ase though. > > On 23 Mar 2002, Jim Winstead wrote: > > > Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't think having a function which outputs an uploaded file is useful. > > > So please only implement one which returns the file. > >

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c basic_functions.h

Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think having a function which outputs an uploaded file is useful. > So please only implement one which returns the file. wouldn't it be most useful to have a function that just *opens* the uploaded file, so people can use fpassthru() or fread() o

Re: [PHP-DEV] getting the path to the php executable

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 05:56:02AM +0100, Marcus B?rger wrote: > At 05:11 18.03.2002, you wrote: > >is there a way to get the path of the current php executable for the cli > >and cgi sapi implementations? this would be nice so that run-tests.php > >could run its subprocesses with the same executa

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: README.SUBMMITING_PATCH

Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe a small online interface for proposing patches (and not losing them) > would bring some order to this mess, but then again, it may be an overkill. someone was preparing a patch for the bug databases so it could handle file attachments. i don't know

[PHP-DEV] getting the path to the php executable

is there a way to get the path of the current php executable for the cli and cgi sapi implementations? this would be nice so that run-tests.php could run its subprocesses with the same executable that it was run with (so you could run the tests with a particular php executable without having to ma

Re: [PHP-DEV] 1 byte overflow in wordwrap

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:34:12AM +, Wez Furlong wrote: > debug("wordwrap: char=" . ord($char) . " cut=" . $cut); you must be using a multi-character linebreak (probably "\r\n"). otherwise the allocation that is being overflown would not be made ('cause it is in the multi-character-line-en

Re: [PHP-DEV] 1 byte overflow in wordwrap

Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll see if I can force it to happen in isolation. are you passing a fourth parameter to wordwrap? the easiest way to track it down would be to insert some debugging statements in the wordwrap() function to print out the text being wrapped, the newtextlen

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /main network.c

Yasuo Ohgaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Feel free to shoot me showing including confirms > ANSI C standard :) the gnu c library documentation indicates that stddef.h and ptrdiff_t are part of the ansi c standard. http://www.aquaphoenix.com/ref/gnu_c_library/libc_483.html jim -- PHP Develop

[PHP-DEV] odbc_execute's file-opening hack

torben's checkin to the documentation reminded me -- why is this gross hack in there, instead of just allowing open filehandles to be passed? the special treatment of strings that begin and end with single quotes just seems like a huge 'wtf?' sort of feature. jim -- PHP Development Mailing Lis

[PHP-DEV] setup.stub files

do these files serve any purpose any more, or are they just leftover remnants from the old setup script? jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] Re: Have you seen the "PHP audit project"?

David Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just read about the "PHP audit project" on NewsForge. More info here: > > http://phpaudit.42-networks.com/ > > Their patch looked great to me, although I didn't browse through all of > it... :-) it's unfortunate that they're auditing 4.1.2, instead

Re: [PHP-DEV] ||=

Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For some reason this doesn't exist in other languages like C++ and Java. > I don't object to adding this as long as their is no good reason why those > languages didn't support these. > What do other people think? i think, given that php's || and && oper

[PHP-DEV] Re: misinformation in regards to php

D D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, I subscribe to this list in hopes that some > experts here will take whatever time it takes to prove > a certain whitepaper as false. a cynic might wonder if it this were merely a thinly guised posting by someone at blueworld.com. but seriously, please tak

Re: [PHP-DEV] New Build System Committed to HEAD

Marcus Börger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Very nice new build system much faster the only thing what's left on that > is .o in all .cvsignore cvs ignores .o files by default, it isn't necessary to list them in the .cvsignore file. jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To u

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard image.c php-master-web/fetch mirrors.php

Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Index: php-master-web/fetch/mirrors.php >> diff -u php-master-web/fetch/mirrors.php:1.1 php-master-web/fetch/mirrors.php:1.2 >> --- php-master-web/fetch/mirrors.php:1.1 Fri Sep 21 15:01:08 2001 >> +++ php-master-web/fetch/mirrors.php Thu Mar 7 19

[PHP-DEV] Re: Zend License

Eric Thelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I read a few months ago that the zend engine was changing its license to > a BSD-style license. But I have heard nothing about it since and the > license file still states that it is released under the QPL. So my > question is when will this change take p

[PHP-DEV] Re: CVS history file?

Sean R. Bright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wondering if I am wrong (that is, I didn't use cvs history > before and I am mistaken) or somehow the history file is > truncated/corrupted/removed/etc. the cvs history file is being rotated (it had grown to enormous proportions over the life of th

[PHP-DEV] Re: New function (repost from php-cvs)

Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what about a new function called strnlen str*n*len which will > return the length of a string with a given maximum to avoid > problems with strings not zero terminated. why not just use memchr()? jim -- PHP Development Mailing List

[PHP-DEV] Re: patch upload in bugs

Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The current bugsystem is not very "patch friendly". And as I see it > browsing through the bugs, patches are often simply ignored without > even tell the submitter what they can do to fix it up. patches to add this to the bug system would be greatly wel

[PHP-DEV] zend checkins now going to zend-engine-cvs@lists.php.net

checkins to the Zend Engine related modules (Zend, ZendEngine2, ZendAPI) are now going to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (and php.zend-engine.cvs newsgroup on news.php.net). you can subscribe to the list at http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php or by sending a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: CVSROOT / loginfo

Sebastian Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are php-cvs subscribers automagically subscribed to the new list? no. (an announcement will be going out shortly.) > What about TSRM? it's still going to php-cvs. jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit:

[PHP-DEV] Re: 4.2.0 & CLI

In php.dev Edin Kadribasic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. If you compile CGI binary and then issue 'make install' it will be > installed in $PREFIX/bin, then CLI will be put in the same place overwriting > it. Any suggestions on what to do in this situation? imho, the cgi binary should get calle

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

August <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As far as I know httpd2 still allows static modules. yes, but the --with-apache option for php4 tries to compile a static version of php4 for apache 1.x. maybe someone will create a --with-apache2 option that allows compiling a static version of php4 for apac

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 and PHP CVS from today

August <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [php4-200202242100]# ./configure --with-apache=../httpd-2.0.32 --with-apache is specific to apache1. you have to use --with-apxs2 to build against apache2. jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/un

Re: [PHP-DEV] FWD: possible bug in date() function

Yasuo Ohgaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Newbill wrote: >> Ehh...from manual >> >> n - month without leading zeros; i.e. "1" to "12" >> >> So yeah it would print 2th. Cause today is the 10"th". > > The format does not make sense much, though. sure it does. the 'bug' reporter had a bogu

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug Summary Report

Edin Kadribasic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could someone please remove duplicate bug reports from the summary. There > are dozen reports saying "scripts run from CGI output "#!/usr/local/bin/php" > line", an issue which is solved in the current CVS. i added 'Duplicate' to the list of statuses t

[PHP-DEV] Re: Case sensitivity: Conclusion(?)

Yasuo Ohgaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess the original reason why PHP has case insensitive > class/function names is consistency with HTML standard. > If so, XHTML _is_ case sensitive, we should go for case > sensitive names. although only rasmus can say for sure, i'd say you are assumin

[PHP-DEV] Re: Bug system feature request

you might want to add these suggestions to this related feature request: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=14815 jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrator

[PHP-DEV] Re: new bug viewing/editing form

Manuel Lemos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Winstead wrote: >> > - Voting does not work on Opera 5.05 for Linux. When you submit the >> > vote, it fails with the message "missing parameter score". >> >> it's a bug in opera. http://bugs.php

[PHP-DEV] Re: new bug viewing/editing form

Manuel Lemos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Winstead wrote: >> as threatened after i implemented bug voting, i've redesign the bug > > Congratulations! Voting is an excellent idea that will help developers > to sort out the priorities of what bugs should be fi

[PHP-DEV] new bug viewing/editing form

as threatened after i implemented bug voting, i've redesign the bug viewing/editing form. thanks to some of the fine folks from the php-qa list, it's already been tested against most common browsers, and enough people complained about the netscape 4 rendering that i applied some tweaks that have m

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #14879 Updated: ereg_replace incorrectly functioning

On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:14:23AM +0100, Markus Fischer wrote: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:05:45AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : > > ereg_replace is behaving as designed, more or less. the behavior of an > > empty first parameter is undefined (although with the bundled regular > > expression

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard string.c /ext/standard/tests/strings wordwrap.phpt

the test using the old code finally finished. it took almost 14 minutes. (the new code takes 0.8 seconds. i'd say it's an improvement.) jim On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 11:02:51PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Nice! > > At 08:46 PM 1/5/2002 +, jim winstead wrote: > >jimw

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard string.c /ext/standard/tests/strings wordwrap.phpt

On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 08:22:24PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote: > You're missing the point. In order to minimize the amount of API misuse of > the str*cat() family of functions we decided only to use the ones I > mentioned, everywhere. I am sure that you're code is correct but all places > should

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard string.c /ext/standard/tests/strings wordwrap.phpt

Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you need to use something like strncat()/strncpy() you should use > strlcpy()/strlcat(). We changed to these functions a couple of years ago. in the case of wordwrap(), it is only copying part of the source string, so strlcat() wouldn't do the job. i

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard basic_functions.c math.c php_math.h /ext/standard/tests/math pow.phpt

Sebastian Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jim winstead wrote: >> jimwFri Jan 4 22:45:11 2002 EDT >> >> Modified files: >> /php4/ext/standard basic_functions.c math.c php_math.h >> /php4/ext/standard/tests/math pow.php

[PHP-DEV] ext/standard/type.{ch}

this appears to be a set of rather orphaned functions. nobody includes the header, and nobody calls the functions. any objections to me moving the is_*() and other type-related functions in there (out of the mondo-cluttered basic_functions.c)? i'm also going to split the guts of is_numeric() out

[PHP-DEV] adding finite(), isnan(), isinf()

these are the standard C library names. are people going to insist they be phpified? is_finite() is_nan(), is_infinite()? jim -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list ad

[PHP-DEV] speaking of PHP 5

if anyone is stumped for ideas for features for php 5, it may be worth trawling through the 428 open feature requests at bugs.php.net. (that's more than a third of the total open bugs for php4. there's an obvious opportunity to beef up those bug-closing stats!) jim -- PHP Development Mailing L

[PHP-DEV] bug voting

inspired by a suggestion made by garth dahlstrom, i've added a basic voting mechanism for bugs. there's currently no reporting on the voting, but since there aren't any votes, there's not much to report. right now, the results of any voting are only available on the page for that bug. obviously be

[PHP-DEV] Re: Built-in SOAP based Web Services support (was Re: PHP 5)

Manuel Lemos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing that I think it is really vital to prevent PHP to leak even > more users to other languages is to have built-in support for consuming > Web services. http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/WebServices/SWSAPI/phptut yes, that's not built-in. but deali

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 04:05:18PM +0100, Martin Jansen wrote: > On 31 Dec 2001 19:18:59 -0000, Jim Winstead wrote: > >Jon Parise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Are there any well-founded objections to this (either in practice > >> or principle)? > > >

[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5

Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Zend Engine 2 has made lots of progress. is there an up-to-date summary of the changes beyond the original ze2 proposal? example scripts that show the new features? > Unrelated, I'm still waiting to hear exactly what mechanism the PEAR guys > implem

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 08:12:25PM -, James Moore wrote: > The QA Teams job needs to be made as easy as possible, at the moment those > people still working activly on QA a lot have a very hard time balancing > time between testing for new bugs, localising and fixing bugs as well as > making s

[PHP-DEV] Re: Moving extensions to PECL

Jon Parise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any well-founded objections to this (either in practice > or principle)? no objections, but one thing that should be considered is what happens to the documentation for these extensions when they are no longer a part of the core distribution. (an

[PHP-DEV] Re: is_array_multidimensional

Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Log: > - Added extra parameter to count() that recursively counts elements in an >array and added is_array_multidimensional(). (patch by Vlad Bosinceanu ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) do we really want to perpetuate this idea that a multidimensional ar

[PHP-DEV] Re: CVS Account Request: bradmssw

Brad House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have written an extension to php for the MCVE engine. It can be > loaded as a module or compiled into the code base, and would like to > have it distributed with PHP. I would need commit access in order to > maintain the module. The product, MCVE is a c

[PHP-DEV] change to cvs access control

in the continuing effort to make things a little easier for those of us who have to deal with administering things for the php project, i've rejiggered the way the cvs access control works a little bit. nobody should have lost access to anything they had access to before, but if you find yourself

[PHP-DEV] Re: news.php.net seems to be down

Colin Viebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't get to it either through the web, or through NNTP. that machine appears to be having some performance problems. i've been planning to move the news server to our second machine at pair, but i'm waiting for them to resolve some networking issues

[PHP-DEV] [ADMIN] spam protection for lists.php.net lists

as some of you may have noticed over the last few days, a new method of spam protection has been implemented on lists.php.net. if you post to one of the lists.php.net lists (via mail or the news server at news.php.net) from a mail address that is not subscribed to the mailing list, you will rece

[PHP-DEV] Re: Bug-updates

Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any idea why bug postings / updates are not longer posted to this list? they were being held up by the spam protection. they should make it through now (and the ones sent in the last few days should start showing up soon). jim -- PHP Development Mail

[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 4.0.1 released?! (RE: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4(PHP_4_0_7) / configure.in /main php_version.h )

Mårten gustafsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shouldn?t this be announced somewhere? i suspect that zeev is giving the mirrors some time to catch up (and perhaps putting together the win32 version of the release) before sending the announcement. be patient. jim -- PHP Development Mailing List

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #14305 Updated: type-o on web site

In php.doc Mike Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found the comments by [EMAIL PROTECTED] quite sad and pathetic. > Good thing that crap like this rolls off us like water off a duck eh? i wouldn't be so sure. i think one thing that drives people away from open-source projects is the long-te

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

since news about 4.1.0 leaked out to the php-general list, wouldn't it make sense to call this one 4.1.1? (or 4.1.0pl1? :) jim Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I plan to roll it quite soon. I'm still waiting for people to ack that the > problem they complained about is gone... > > Ze

[PHP-DEV] Re: Karma Request

Sean R. Bright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I am out of karma or something, I tried to commit a fix and > received the following error: > >cvs [server aborted]: "commit" requires write access to the >repository this isn't a karma problem. it appears that the cvs server is

[PHP-DEV] Re: [Fwd: Adoption of Metabase (was Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Comparing ADODB with PEAR ]

Manuel Lemos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems that the newsgroup message approval mechanism is not working > when you post to more than one newsgroup. care to explain what you mean? your post showed up on both lists just fine, as far as i can tell. http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.

[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: jim

this is just a test. don't mind me. -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PHP-DEV] MFB

to make the cvs history easier to read, it is preferable to make the change in HEAD and do a MFH then make the change on a branch and do an MFB. (probably not a huge deal, since it doesn't happen often, but i thought i'd throw it out there. maybe it should be added as a suggestion to the CVS-RULE

[PHP-DEV] Re: Bug #13748 Updated: Exec() and System() broken

On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 12:36:03AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Why isn't php.net redirecting after a POST? That's a common solution, and > also makes sure you can have a logic-only php script, since you're > redirecting to a page-with-layout. it does redirect now. there was a bug when t

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] fix gethostbyname() to return false when hostname not resolved

it will send you to the right place once the site updates from cvs. jim On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 02:21:13PM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Yes, but that's not where http://bugs.php.net/search.php sends you when > you put a bug id number in the form. > > > On Tue, 25 Se

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] fix gethostbyname() to return false when hostname not resolved

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 02:00:56PM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > here's a patch to fix bug #13423. think anyone is relying on the > > current (vastly lame, imho) behavior? > > Did you break the bug system somehow? I am having no luck looking up > individual bugs, including this one. > http://

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] fix gethostbyname() to return false when hostname not resolved

here's a patch to fix bug #13423. think anyone is relying on the current (vastly lame, imho) behavior? jim Index: ext/standard/dns.c === RCS file: /repository/php4/ext/standard/dns.c,v retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -r1.35 dns.c -

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Versioning rules for PHP/Zend/PEAR/Extensions

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 03:00:05AM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote: > First, you forget that for the vast majority of end users, treating RC's as > releases is going to be nightmarish. RC's are a reality check before > release, and so far, we haven't had a single RC that was release > worthy. Just

Re: [PHP-DEV] news.php.net is back.

On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:53:48PM -0400, Colin Viebrock wrote: > > (the server software will be released soonish. keep an eye on > > http://news.php.net/ for an announcement.) (to be clear, the code i was talking about there was the actual nntp server. the web interface is already in cvs as php-

Re: SV: [PHP-DEV] The new design

(cc'ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] please continue this discussion there.) In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I generally like the new design, but this statement appears to be trying > to fix the symptom, instead of the problem itself. If so many people > miss the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Rsync and CVS

On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:34:36AM +1300, Simon Roberts wrote: > >right now, there's a mix of entries in the notes database marked > >using the page title and the page id. the ones identified only by > >title need to get fixed in the database. > > Out of interest, why did we change to using the p

Re: [PHP-DEV] Rsync and CVS

this is one of the things on my to-do list. i'll try to get to it in the next few days. (it will get generated into the rsync repository, for what its worth. generated stuff no longer goes into cvs) jim In article <002001c0a5e4$8f868c20$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A quest

Re: [PHP-DEV] phpMyAdmin and arg_separator = "&"

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi there, > > I just came across something very odd: > > After setting > > arg_separator = "&" > > in my php.ini Tobias Ratschiller's phpMyAdmin no longer works > correctly. > > The start page loads correctly, every

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #2328 Updated: I would like animated gif support within php.

i wasn't aware that gd supported animated gifs (and a quick glance in the manual didn't show any functions that seemed to be relevant). if i'm mistaken, someone can close this bug. jim On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 07:05:39PM -, James Moore wrote: > whats wrong with gd? Although current version do

  1   2   >