On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 12:48 PM 2/26/2003 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >I think we can add "%option never-interactive" to the ini-scanner lexer to
^
Yes, this is a good idea - INI files are never i
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 12:48 PM 2/26/2003 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >I think we can add "%option never-interactive" to the ini-scanner lexer to
> >speed it up a tiny little bit. Speeding up the ini scanner might be
> >important for the folks running the cgi version. M
At 12:48 PM 2/26/2003 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I think we can add "%option never-interactive" to the ini-scanner lexer to
speed it up a tiny little bit. Speeding up the ini scanner might be
important for the folks running the cgi version. More importantly, to me
anyway, when we know we are no
I think we can add "%option never-interactive" to the ini-scanner lexer to
speed it up a tiny little bit. Speeding up the ini scanner might be
important for the folks running the cgi version. More importantly, to me
anyway, when we know we are not interactive, should we not
programmatically set i
