Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

2001-11-30 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Tobias Schenck wrote: Short time after the announcement just disappeared. I don't know about the traffic on php-center.de or phpwelt.de (was on one of the sites) but quite a couple of people not tracking php.dev might have downloaded it. PHP-Center.de, for which I am a author and

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

2001-11-30 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
Tobias Schenck wrote: actually not just news leaked out: I found a download-link on one of the german php-related sites and downloaded php-4.1.0.tar.gz (around 27th 9:43 GMT). Short time after the announcement just disappeared. I don't know about the traffic on php-center.de or phpwelt.de

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

2001-11-30 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: yes, lets follow the apache scheme of skiping version numbers for versions that might have slipped out ahead of time, even if not as obvious as in this case, just to make sure to prevent any chance of confusion, as we have nothing to loose by

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

2001-11-30 Thread James Moore
since news about 4.1.0 leaked out to the php-general list, wouldn't it make sense to call this one 4.1.1? (or 4.1.0pl1? :) Why?? Yes 4.1.0 was leaked on php-general and php-homepage.de but both were replied to making it very clear 4.1.0 hasnt been released yet. calling 4.1.0pl1 or 4.1.1

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

2001-11-30 Thread Egon Schmid
From: Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tobias Schenck wrote: Short time after the announcement just disappeared. I don't know about the traffic on php-center.de or phpwelt.de (was on one of the sites) but quite a couple of people not tracking php.dev might have downloaded it.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

2001-11-30 Thread Egon Schmid
From: Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tobias Schenck wrote: Short time after the announcement just disappeared. I don't know about the traffic on php-center.de or phpwelt.de (was on one of the sites) but quite a couple of people not tracking php.dev might have downloaded it.

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

2001-11-29 Thread Zeev Suraski
I plan to roll it quite soon. I'm still waiting for people to ack that the problem they complained about is gone... Zeev At 20:36 29/11/2001, Zak Greant wrote: Hello QAers, If anyone missed the thread on the PHP Dev list, it looks like we will be testing another RC of PHP 4.1.0. There is no

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

2001-11-29 Thread Jim Winstead
since news about 4.1.0 leaked out to the php-general list, wouldn't it make sense to call this one 4.1.1? (or 4.1.0pl1? :) jim Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I plan to roll it quite soon. I'm still waiting for people to ack that the problem they complained about is gone... Zeev

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

2001-11-29 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
On 29 Nov 2001 20:05:03 - Jim Winstead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: since news about 4.1.0 leaked out to the php-general list, wouldn't it make sense to call this one 4.1.1? (or 4.1.0pl1? :) IMHO, there s not any official infos about the 4.1.0, I read announces on french php sites (certainly

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.1.0RC4

2001-11-29 Thread Jani Taskinen
Oh..I should read all emails before sending any. :) But indeed, this would make sense. (PHP 4.1.1 that is..) --Jani On 29 Nov 2001, Jim Winstead wrote: since news about 4.1.0 leaked out to the php-general list, wouldn't it make sense to call this one 4.1.1? (or 4.1.0pl1? :) jim Zeev