Jani wrote:
>
> Maybe we should have something like the terrorist cells?
> ie. groups of 3 persons who know only about the one above them?
>
>X
> __|_
> /\
>a b
> / | \ / \
> c (d) e e g
>
[...]
>
Wow this sounds like one of my ideas Jani. :)
All
At 13:47 3/5/2001, Cynic wrote:
>Zeev,
>
>do you think ASF is a Nazi-like group? I don't think so.
>Nor do I witness endless discussions caused by the fact that
>the Apache release cycle is far (in a galaxy far, far away.. :)
>stricter than the PHP one.
I was talking about the ruleset and the way
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>At 12:47 PM 5/3/2001 +0200, Cynic wrote:
>Is it? I'm not that sure. They also release with known bugs although I
>admit to not knowing their exact release cycle so I won't comment more on
Ehem. We release with known bugs too but we don't tell it to anyone
At 12:48 3.5. 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote the following:
--
>At 12:47 PM 5/3/2001 +0200, Cynic wrote:
>>Zeev,
>>
>>do you think ASF is a Nazi-like group? I don't think so.
>>Nor do I witness endless discussions caused by the fact that
>>the
At 12:47 PM 5/3/2001 +0200, Cynic wrote:
>Zeev,
>
>do you think ASF is a Nazi-like group? I don't think so.
>Nor do I witness endless discussions caused by the fact that
>the Apache release cycle is far (in a galaxy far, far away.. :)
>stricter than the PHP one.
Is it? I'm not that sure. They als
Zeev,
do you think ASF is a Nazi-like group? I don't think so.
Nor do I witness endless discussions caused by the fact that
the Apache release cycle is far (in a galaxy far, far away.. :)
stricter than the PHP one.
4.0.5 took very long to release, and it seems like it could
have been released
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Sascha Schumann wrote:
>Funny that you mention my name as the first one in the list.
Only because Andi mentioned you before:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-qa&m=98883232300315&w=2
:)
>I've been known for arguing for completely shutting down
>commit access
At 12:12 3/5/2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>On Thu, 3 May 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> >And you expect us to give you that power? :)
>
>Did I suggest that? I didn't. I was referring only to
>the rest of that piece of text, not the part about 'giving power'.
>Give the QA team that power. Let the r
At 11:08 AM 5/3/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
>On Thu, 3 May 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2 May 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > >Give the QA team that power. Let the release branch be reserved
> exclusively
> > >for bugfixes, and give the QA team control over what gets commi
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> > Amen. There can't be _ANY_ exceptions to this. Not even Sascha or ANYBODY
> > else. Including Zeev/Andi/Rasmus. Just thinking of that FastCGI thingie..
>
> Funny that you mention my name as the first o
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>And you expect us to give you that power? :)
Did I suggest that? I didn't. I was referring only to
the rest of that piece of text, not the part about 'giving power'.
>Seriously, PHP isn't going to start following Nazi-like strict rules. We
>shouldn't ge
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> >Give the QA team that power. Let the release branch be reserved exclusively
> >for bugfixes, and give the QA team control over what gets committed to the
> >branch. This is the only way to make headway aga
And you expect us to give you that power? :)
Seriously, PHP isn't going to start following Nazi-like strict rules. We
shouldn't get into jurisdictions and stuff like that because they're
endless discussions with no point. In an opensource project you can set
guidelines, not laws, and we shoul
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
>Give the QA team that power. Let the release branch be reserved exclusively
>for bugfixes, and give the QA team control over what gets committed to the
>branch. This is the only way to make headway against bugs.
Amen. There can't be _ANY_ exceptions t
14 matches
Mail list logo
