On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 07:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
>
> > > me. I think it would really confuse people. I suggest adding another
> > > function. It should probably be only enabled in debug builds because the
> > > end user shouldn't be worrying about
Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>If dump_internals() is going to be enabled only for DEBUG build,
>>could you make it a module?
>>
>>It's much easier for me to load/unload module rather than swithing
>>builds.
>>
>
> A module for one function wo
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If dump_internals() is going to be enabled only for DEBUG build,
> could you make it a module?
>
> It's much easier for me to load/unload module rather than swithing
> builds.
A module for one function would be waaay too much of an overki
I was planning on just adding it to /ext/standard, and building it
whether or not php is in debug mode.
-Jason
On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 19:41, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If dump_internals() is going to be enabled only for DEBUG build,
> could you make it a module?
>
> It's much easier for me t
Hi,
If dump_internals() is going to be enabled only for DEBUG build,
could you make it a module?
It's much easier for me to load/unload module rather than swithing
builds.
--
Yasuo Ohagaki
Jason Greene wrote:
> Ya, I guess this could be confusing to most users. I don't think this
> should
At 06:52 AM 2/7/2002 +0100, Markus Fischer wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:21:07AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote :
> > At 11:03 PM 2/6/2002 -0600, Jason Greene wrote:
> >
> > >Would anyone object if I added refcount information to var_dump?
> >
> > me. I think it would really confuse people. I sug
Ya, I guess this could be confusing to most users. I don't think this
should be a debug only item because this could be used to help an
extension developer get useful debug info from a bug reporter, and I can
see no possible harm in having an extra function.
How about dump_internals() ?
I was t
Markus Fischer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:17:52AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
>
>>On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
>>
>>
me. I think it would really confuse people. I suggest adding another
function. It should probably be only enabled in debug builds because the
>>
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:17:52AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
>
> > > me. I think it would really confuse people. I suggest adding another
> > > function. It should probably be only enabled in debug builds because the
> > > end user shouldn't be
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
> > me. I think it would really confuse people. I suggest adding another
> > function. It should probably be only enabled in debug builds because the
> > end user shouldn't be worrying about refcounts. It's an internal thing.
>
> Certain function only
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:21:07AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote :
> At 11:03 PM 2/6/2002 -0600, Jason Greene wrote:
>
> >Would anyone object if I added refcount information to var_dump?
>
> me. I think it would really confuse people. I suggest adding another
> function. It should probably be onl
At 11:03 PM 2/6/2002 -0600, Jason Greene wrote:
>Would anyone object if I added refcount information to var_dump?
me. I think it would really confuse people. I suggest adding another
function. It should probably be only enabled in debug builds because the
end user shouldn't be worrying about
12 matches
Mail list logo
