Re: [PHP-DEV] [WARNING] Release process for 4.3.2 starts RSN..

2003-03-10 Thread Zeev Suraski
At 18:17 09/03/2003, Derick Rethans wrote: Hello, I guess nobody is interested in fixing this? Then I guess we won't get 4.3.2 ever. 4.3.2 will be coming out soon either way, there's really no need for this kind of talk. I'll see if I can get some of these fixed, but we should get ready to relea

Re: [PHP-DEV] [WARNING] Release process for 4.3.2 starts RSN..

2003-03-09 Thread David Brown
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 05:17:37PM +0100, Derick Rethans wrote: | Hello, | | I guess nobody is interested in fixing this? Then I guess we won't get | 4.3.2 ever. | | > To get this thing started, I'm going to roll PHP 4.3.2-pre1 | > on Wednesday, 26th Feb, around 3pm EEST. And I'll announ

Re: [PHP-DEV] [WARNING] Release process for 4.3.2 starts RSN..

2003-03-09 Thread Derick Rethans
Hello, I guess nobody is interested in fixing this? Then I guess we won't get 4.3.2 ever. Derick On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Jani Taskinen wrote: > > To get this thing started, I'm going to roll PHP 4.3.2-pre1 > on Wednesday, 26th Feb, around 3pm EEST. And I'll announce > it on php-gener

Re: [PHP-DEV] [WARNING] Release process for 4.3.2 starts RSN..

2003-03-06 Thread Petar
Any progress towards a 4.3.2 release? Cheers ..Petar - Original Message - From: "Jani Taskinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Shane Caraveo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday

Re: [PHP-DEV] [WARNING] Release process for 4.3.2 starts RSN..

2003-02-23 Thread Jani Taskinen
It's just the date for pre1, no need to worry about that yet. :) (RC1 will be later) --Jani On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Shane Caraveo wrote: >I wanted to run through all the cgi stuff in detail again for 432, but >likely wont have the time by the 26th to do that. >Shane > >Jani T

Re: [PHP-DEV] [WARNING] Release process for 4.3.2 starts RSN..

2003-02-23 Thread Shane Caraveo
I wanted to run through all the cgi stuff in detail again for 432, but likely wont have the time by the 26th to do that. Shane Jani Taskinen wrote: To get this thing started, I'm going to roll PHP 4.3.2-pre1 on Wednesday, 26th Feb, around 3pm EEST. And I'll announce it on php-general

Re: [PHP-DEV] Warning in wrong parameter

2002-12-24 Thread Leon Atkinson
> Is there any possibility that > PHP return me a warning with the message (e.g.) "Warning parameter > number for [function name] in [page.php] line [line number]" ??? If you really need this behavior, do something like assert('func_num_args() == 1'); That should generate the warning you describ

Re: [PHP-DEV] Warning in wrong parameter

2002-12-24 Thread Tal Peer
This is totally bogus, your error_reporting setting should be E_ALL, not ALL. michel 'ziobudda' morelli wrote: Hi, I have installed php 4.2.1 and error_reporting = ALL. I write a function called foo() that accept only 1 parameter. Now if I write: $result = foo("bar"); ?> All is ok. If I wr

Re: [PHP-DEV] Warning in PHP_4_0_7 branch

2001-09-25 Thread Sterling Hughes
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > zend_llist.c > D:\home\php\php4\Zend\zend_llist.c(214) : warning C4018: '<' : > Conflict between signed and unsigned > Fixed in CVS. -Sterling -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [PHP-DEV] Warning

2001-05-24 Thread Sascha Schumann
> What do you mean by ripping it out? What would we use instead? Hand crafted > Makefiles? > I think it general automake is doing pretty well no? Automake is slow, bloated, inflexible and generally bad for large projects. That is an insight which led to the redesign of the PHP 4.0 bu

Re: [PHP-DEV] Warning

2001-05-24 Thread Boian Bonev
> > > At link I'm getting "gcc: unrecognized option `-prefer-non-pic'" > > > My gcc version: > > > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs > > > gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) > > > > > > It's not an error but is this option really nec

Re: [PHP-DEV] Warning

2001-05-24 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 03:07 PM 5/24/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote: >On Thu, 24 May 2001, Boian Bonev wrote: > > > > At link I'm getting "gcc: unrecognized option `-prefer-non-pic'" > > > My gcc version: > > > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs > > > gcc version egcs-2.91.66

Re: [PHP-DEV] Warning

2001-05-24 Thread Sascha Schumann
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Boian Bonev wrote: > > At link I'm getting "gcc: unrecognized option `-prefer-non-pic'" > > My gcc version: > > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs > > gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) > > > > It's not an error

Re: [PHP-DEV] Warning

2001-05-24 Thread Boian Bonev
> At link I'm getting "gcc: unrecognized option `-prefer-non-pic'" > My gcc version: > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs > gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) > > It's not an error but is this option really necessary? i've seen in ye