I have two things I'd like to mention regarding PSR-13:
First, for me personally it makes less sense to have a
LinkCollectionInterface that doesn't act like I'D expect a Collection to
work. For me a collection is a set of similar items I can then iterate
over. Whether that's a collection of lin
-1 from eZ
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ph
On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 8:44:29 AM UTC-6, Alexander Deruwe wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Adam Culp > wrote:
> > Let's stop applying the rules of "serious" PSRs to such a thing and
> > get rid of it.
>
> This. It's so obvious, please.
>
It's also a very dangerous precede
I will carry over my comments from another thread
at https://groups.google.com/d/msg/php-fig/YvHARo5G1w4/WhYbT0gNAgAJ
The topic of PSR-8 has come up many times over the past couple years. It
> was cute, but we need to move on. We should be able to shrug it off as the
> joke it was. Let's stop a
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Adam Culp wrote:
> Let's stop applying the rules of "serious" PSRs to such a thing and
> get rid of it.
This. It's so obvious, please.
A.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group
Samantha,
I think you and Michael are applying a certain "tone", and taking offense,
with Paul's question of whether the group was aware and involved in what
could have been a decision making discussion, or if it was only the
secretaries. This is a voting members right to ask. Paul, and others,
-1 from PPI Framework
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Andres Gutierrez <
gutierrezandresfel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1 from Phalcon
>
> On Sunday, 4 September 2016 11:26:50 UTC-5, Michael Cullum wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are
>>
> On 10 Sep 2016, at 12:47, Michiel Rook wrote:
>
> I'm a bit ambivalent about PSR-8. I voted against it, but I don't think
> withdrawing it is worth the effort.
same here
regards,
Lukas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoper
I wonder why do we bother too much about PSR-8 now?
If you all bother that much it should never have been introduced here.
Thank you
*Hari K T*
You can ring me : +91 9388 75 8821
http://harikt.com , https://github.com/harikt ,
http://www.linkedin.com/in/harikt , http://www.xing.com/profile/Har
I'm a bit ambivalent about PSR-8. I voted against it, but I don't think
withdrawing it is worth the effort.
Michiel
On 9-9-2016 17:15, Paul Jones wrote:
Hi all,
Measure: "Withdraw PSR-8 from consideration as a PSR."
I presume that the editor is willing, based on other conversations.
And sin
10 matches
Mail list logo
