Hi All,
First of all, I want to apologize to everyone for the content of this
email. My hope is that it won't seemtoo critical and instead will read how
I intended.
Here's a list of my positions:
1. This thread is depressing
2. People on every side need to take a step back and chill
3. PSR-8 i
Larry,
Please do not partially quote me. Your partial quote of my words creates a
much different connotation than what was stated, which based on your
follow-up comment was obviously the intent. The complete thought, which
should have included "really shouldn't be happening, in this case, becau
As a person that has spent the last couple weeks looking at this thread
and others, feeling I should call Paul's BS many times, and not doing it
because frankly I don't have the energy and rather spend it on other
stuff, I can indeed confirm all this shit is driving people away.
Paul seems ben
Fellow FIG list members, we have been trolled.
PSR-8 is a non-issue, non-entity, with no activity. It was an April
Fools joke cum running gag, in which Paul was an active participant as
Sponsor. Why did Paul bring it up right now? Of all times? And with an
obviously baiting subject line? It
I totally agree with Jason. Also, it may conflict with the fact that the
PSRs are released under MIT license.
Il giorno lunedì 12 settembre 2016 12:19:05 UTC+2, Jason Judge ha scritto:
>
> On Friday, 9 September 2016 15:53:28 UTC+1, pmjones wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>&
On Friday, 9 September 2016 15:53:28 UTC+1, pmjones wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am resigning my position as sponsor of PSR-8, the "Huggable" Interface.
> This was a fun joke way-back-when, but its time has passed.
>
> And if I may suggest it, perhaps the editor sho
On Sunday, September 11, 2016 at 8:44:29 AM UTC-6, Alexander Deruwe wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Adam Culp > wrote:
> > Let's stop applying the rules of "serious" PSRs to such a thing and
> > get rid of it.
>
> This. It's so obvious, please.
>
It's also a very dangerous precede
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Adam Culp wrote:
> Let's stop applying the rules of "serious" PSRs to such a thing and
> get rid of it.
This. It's so obvious, please.
A.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group
Samantha,
I think you and Michael are applying a certain "tone", and taking offense,
with Paul's question of whether the group was aware and involved in what
could have been a decision making discussion, or if it was only the
secretaries. This is a voting members right to ask. Paul, and others,
Samantha,
> On Sep 10, 2016, at 20:42, Samantha Quiñones wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> I already talked about this in the other thread. Continually antagonizing
> Michael is not an appropriate way of addressing whatever issues you may have
> with the way he conducts himself as a secretary of this orga
Paul,
I already talked about this in the other thread. Continually antagonizing
Michael is not an appropriate way of addressing whatever issues you may
have with the way he conducts himself as a secretary of this organization.
Likewise, attempting to press your definition of our role as secreta
We could come up with a bylaw that handles both abandonment as well as a
voluntary withdrawal. We just need to define that as a status for a PSR.
I'm not against enacting a bylaw for abandonment/withdrawal as I was very
much behind the original abandonment rules, I'm just pointing out that it
has
Hi Chris,
> On Sep 9, 2016, at 10:25, Chris Tankersley wrote:
>
> You were in the room at ZendCon 2015's FIG meeting when we brought up the
> whole abandonment issue and how we should handle it. The notes are here:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/php-fig/FIG$20Zendcon%7Csort:re
>
> > We [secretaries] discussed PSR-8 a while back and we've also been part
> of numerous conversations with Larry [PSR-8 Editor] and other folks and we
> came to the conclusion that it doesn't appear there is really a way to
> withdraw PSRs for the moment.
>
> Interesting; was that brought u
We were discussing the status of various PSRs so we could see what
resources they needed and the like in one of our first monthly meetings and
when PSR-8 came up, we were aware it was stuck in Limbo (because of it's
nature) so we contacted the Editor [Larry] to discuss what he wanted to do
regardin
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Paul Jones wrote:
>
> > On Sep 9, 2016, at 10:08, Michael Cullum wrote:
> >
> > We [secretaries] discussed PSR-8 a while back and we've also been part
> of numerous conversations with Larry [PSR-8 Editor] and other folks and we
> came to the conclusion that it do
erent
> environment today if we had a few more hugs.
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:53 AM Paul Jones wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am resigning my position as sponsor of PSR-8, the "Huggable" Interface.
>> This was a fun joke way-back-when, but its
> On Sep 9, 2016, at 10:08, Michael Cullum wrote:
>
> We [secretaries] discussed PSR-8 a while back and we've also been part of
> numerous conversations with Larry [PSR-8 Editor] and other folks and we came
> to the conclusion that it doesn't appear there is really a way to withdraw
> PSRs fo
If only this had passed an acceptance vote, maybe we'd have a different
environment today if we had a few more hugs.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:53 AM Paul Jones wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am resigning my position as sponsor of PSR-8, the "Huggable" Interface.
> This was a
Hi all,
I am resigning my position as sponsor of PSR-8, the "Huggable" Interface. This
was a fun joke way-back-when, but its time has passed.
And if I may suggest it, perhaps the editor should voluntarily withdraw the PSR
from consideration.
Thanks everyone!
--
Paul M. Jones
htt
20 matches
Mail list logo
