>http://www.bettina-attack.de/jonny/view.php/projects/php_writeexcel/
>And, hey, when the hell will the PHP developers implement a foreach loop which
>assigns the array values by reference??
+100!
(still reading the rest)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, vis
just curious, why did you choose to use it from behind a stream wrapper?
and sry, i have no exp with these beasts..
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Matt Neimeyer wrote:
> I created a stream wrapper around the php_writeexcel library found at
> http://www.bettina-attack.de/jonny/view.php/projec
> -Original Message-
> From: Rene Veerman [mailto:rene7...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 22 February 2010 09:09
>
> >http://www.bettina-
> attack.de/jonny/view.php/projects/php_writeexcel/
> >And, hey, when the hell will the PHP developers implement a foreach
> loop which assigns the array values b
I have a PHP page that has
require_once("genMyOverlay.js.php");
.
.
.
echo "";
echo "doit(\"mydiv\");";
echo "";
genMyOverlay.js.php contains: createDiv() (see below) that creates a and sets it up to overlay a portion of the wbe page and
doit()starts it off.
invoke the web page once and i
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:09 -0600, Stan wrote:
> I have a PHP page that has
> require_once("genMyOverlay.js.php");
> .
> .
> .
> echo "";
> echo "doit(\"mydiv\");";
> echo "";
>
> genMyOverlay.js.php contains: createDiv() (see below) that creates a ID="mydiv"> and sets it up to overlay a
At 3:15 PM + 2/22/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Also, your script tags need a type attribute:
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 12:33 -0500, tedd wrote:
> At 3:15 PM + 2/22/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >Also, your script tags need a type attribute:
> >
> >
At 5:32 PM + 2/22/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 12:33 -0500, tedd wrote:
At 3:15 PM + 2/22/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Also, your script tags need a type attribute:
>
Hi All,
I have Forms that I submit for processing. I have seen examples of people using
either $_POST or $_REQUEST.
When would I choose one over the other?
Also, I see examples of these being used with and without the single quotes
Like:
$_POST[j_orderValue]
or
$_POST['j_orderValue']
Single
Hi,
> I have Forms that I submit for processing. I have seen examples of people
> using either $_POST or $_REQUEST.
>
> When would I choose one over the other?
It's a wise choice to go with $_POST, unless your form is a GET form,
in which case use $_GET. $_REQUEST has the potential to open your
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Slack-Moehrle
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have Forms that I submit for processing. I have seen examples of people
> using either $_POST or $_REQUEST.
>
> When would I choose one over the other?
>
> Also, I see examples of these being used with and without the single qu
Richard wrote:
It's a wise choice to go with $_POST, unless your form is a GET form,
in which case use $_GET. $_REQUEST has the potential to open your
script(s) up to security issues.
I am not sure what the security issues are you are referring to as the
$_REQUEST superglobal contains both
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Slack-Moehrle
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have Forms that I submit for processing. I have seen examples of people
> using either $_POST or $_REQUEST.
>
> When would I choose one over the other?
I like to be specific and go for $_POST, but some people want
flexibility
On 02/22/2010 09:39 PM, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
I have Forms that I submit for processing. I have seen examples of people using
either $_POST or $_REQUEST.
When would I choose one over the other?
When you don't care how you get the data use $_REQUEST.
$_REQUEST will contain $_GET,$_POST,$
> i'd expect without quotes to query a define('j_orderValue','??')..
oh, and that, if not defined, defaults to the string 'j_orderValue'.
So while your $_POST[] with or without quotes will "do the same", use
single-quotes anyway because it's "the right thing to do" ;)
--
PHP General Mailing List
Hi,
> I am not sure what the security issues are you are referring to as the
> $_REQUEST superglobal contains both $_GET and $_POST values. Could you
> expound on that? Thanks.
Not really, do a search.
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 canvas graphing: RGraph - http://www.rgraph.net (updated 20th Februa
Hi Slack-Moehrle
Slack-Moehrle wrote on 22/02/2010 21:39:
Hi All,
I have Forms that I submit for processing. I have seen examples of people using
either $_POST or $_REQUEST.
When would I choose one over the other?
$_REQUEST['test'] is true on both $_GET['test'] and $_POST['test']
I use it
> I have Forms that I submit for processing. I have seen examples of people
> using either $_POST or $_REQUEST.
>
Look at this example:
Now what do you thing $_REQUEST will return? You had better not even
think. Just use $_POST or $_GET as you _know_ what they will return.
Don't forget, the
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Joseph Thayne wrote:
> I am not sure what the security issues are you are referring to as the
> $_REQUEST superglobal contains both $_GET and $_POST values. Could you
> expound on that? Thanks.
$_REQUEST opens you up to POST/GET values overriding cookie values
Richard,
The use of $_REQUEST it no more a security hole than $_GET or $_REQUEST,
they should ALL be treats as bad data until normalized and sanitized. The
claim that it opens a security hole is just false, thats like saying PHP
is insecure, its not it just allows for lazy coding such as $_RE
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:30 PM, David Murphy wrote:
> Richard,
>
>
> The use of $_REQUEST it no more a security hole than $_GET or $_REQUEST,
> they should ALL be treats as bad data until normalized and sanitized. The
> claim that it opens a security hole is just false, that’s like saying PHP
John,
>>Then if you use a MySQL database you would escape the string like this
>>$tmp = mysql_real_escape_string($_REQUEST['yyy']);
>>mysql_real_escape_string() protect from SQL injection by escaping your
>>string according to what your charset requires.
Good point, I should be doing that. But
On 02/22/2010 10:37 PM, Michael Shadle wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:30 PM, David Murphy wrote:
Richard,
The use of $_REQUEST it no more a security hole than $_GET or $_REQUEST,
they should ALL be treats as bad data until normalized and sanitized. The
claim that it opens a security hole is
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:07 PM, John Black
wrote:
> And how is this more secure? I can create a cookie, send post or get on my
> client machine and send anything I want to the server. Just because you are
> getting a cookie does not mean that you created it :)
>
> So you might as well use reques
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Slack-Moehrle
wrote:
> John,
>
>>>Then if you use a MySQL database you would escape the string like this
>>>$tmp = mysql_real_escape_string($_REQUEST['yyy']);
>
>
>>>mysql_real_escape_string() protect from SQL injection by escaping your
>>>string according to what
On 02/22/2010 11:17 PM, Michael Shadle wrote:
"Secure" might be the wrong term here. As you can easily change GET to
POST and vice-versa and send any cookies you like, this is why I tried
to revise my statement and quantify it better... in a properly coded
app it doesn't present much issue. Howev
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 22:37, Michael Shadle wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:30 PM, David Murphy wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>>
>> The use of $_REQUEST it no more a security hole than $_GET or $_REQUEST,
>> they should ALL be treats as bad data until normalized and sanitized. The
>> claim that it
Hello,
I am needing assistance IMMEDIATELY in finishing up a project (the
developer went in to have shoulder surgery and will be out of
commission for 3 weeks) and I need this finished soon.
Candidate must have good english skills, a solid knowledge of HTML,
CSS, PHP, mySQL, Javascript, A
The difference here is you can at least have some control over the
data and expect it in a certain fashion. Also the behavior of cookies
vs. get vs. post are different (cookies have length and expiration
limits, get has length limits, post has server confgured limits)
Like I said a properly
Op 2/22/10 8:39 PM, Slack-Moehrle schreef:
> Hi All,
>
> I have Forms that I submit for processing. I have seen examples of people
> using either $_POST or $_REQUEST.
>
> When would I choose one over the other?
use $_POST, $_REQUEST is normally an amalgam of GET, POST and COOKIE - as such
usin
On 02/22/2010 11:42 PM, Michael Shadle wrote:
The difference here is you can at least have some control over the data
and expect it in a certain fashion. Also the behavior of cookies vs. get
vs. post are different (cookies have length and expiration limits, get
has length limits, post has server
Hi Don,
i work for the company simplynetworks in germany. I have access to may
programmers with the best quality to the best prices. We work quick and
no dirty ;-)
I am programmer too and my company offer you the best object oriented
software of the market. Some references of my clients in Germ
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:49 +0100, John Black wrote:
> On 02/22/2010 11:42 PM, Michael Shadle wrote:
> > The difference here is you can at least have some control over the data
> > and expect it in a certain fashion. Also the behavior of cookies vs. get
> > vs. post are different (cookies have len
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 14:39 -0800, Don Wieland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am needing assistance IMMEDIATELY in finishing up a project (the
> developer went in to have shoulder surgery and will be out of
> commission for 3 weeks) and I need this finished soon.
>
> Candidate must have good english
Hello everyone,
I've just subscribed to the list, and I already have a question.
what I need to do is to send mail using sockets. Actually, the
built-in Mail() function is great and I wouldn't have to search for
something else if I didn't need more than one message to be sent at a
time. Say, I have
> -Original Message-
> From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk]
>
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 14:39 -0800, Don Wieland wrote:
>
> > I am needing assistance IMMEDIATELY in finishing up a project (the
> > developer went in to have shoulder surgery and will be out of
> > com
have you tried mail() with a large bcc header?
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Andre Polykanine wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I've just subscribed to the list, and I already have a question.
> what I need to do is to send mail using sockets. Actually, the
> built-in Mail() function is great and I w
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:16:24AM +0200, Andre Polykanine wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I've just subscribed to the list, and I already have a question.
> what I need to do is to send mail using sockets. Actually, the
> built-in Mail() function is great and I wouldn't have to search for
> something
Using MySQL 5.075, PHP 5.25 on Debian unstable.
Has anyone noticed, when issuing a PDOStatement::rowCount() call after a
DELETE, UPDATE or INSERT, the return is uniformly zero, rather than the
actual number of rows affected?
If so, is there a simple workaround?
Paul
--
Paul M. Foster
--
PHP
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
> Using MySQL 5.075, PHP 5.25 on Debian unstable.
>
> Has anyone noticed, when issuing a PDOStatement::rowCount() call after a
> DELETE, UPDATE or INSERT, the return is uniformly zero, rather than the
> actual number of rows affected?
>
quick
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:18:25PM -0700, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Paul M Foster
> wrote:
>
> Using MySQL 5.075, PHP 5.25 on Debian unstable.
>
> Has anyone noticed, when issuing a PDOStatement::rowCount() call after a
> DELETE, UPDATE or INSERT, the r
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:18:25PM -0700, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Paul M Foster
> wrote:
> >
> > Using MySQL 5.075, PHP 5.25 on Debian unstable.
> >
> > Has anyone noticed, when issuing a PDOStateme
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:50:30PM -0500, Paul M Foster wrote:
> Using MySQL 5.075, PHP 5.25 on Debian unstable.
>
> Has anyone noticed, when issuing a PDOStatement::rowCount() call after a
> DELETE, UPDATE or INSERT, the return is uniformly zero, rather than the
> actual number of rows affected?
I have a desktop app that has a data structure that looks like this:
typedef struct MANGOpie
{
unsigned char mango;
unsigned short pie;
}
MANGOpie;
I manage a C array of these things in memory:
MANGOpie * pies = (MANGOpie *)malloc(count*sizeof(MANGOpie));
I pass these to a PHP s
On Monday, February 22, 2010, php.l...@juun.com wrote:
>
> I have a desktop app that has a data structure that looks like this:
>
> typedef struct MANGOpie
> {
> unsigned char mango;
> unsigned short pie;
> }
> MANGOpie;
>
>
>
> I manage a C array of these things in memory:
>
> MANGOpie *
have you considered using json as transport?
http://json.org/ has code you can re-use.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:29 AM, php.l...@juun.com wrote:
>
> I have a desktop app that has a data structure that looks like this:
>
> typedef struct MANGOpie
> {
> unsigned char mango;
> unsigned short
I'm actually moving from a string-encoded transport to binary for
compactness. The array can potentially get pretty large. I'm shooting
for the smallest possible representation of the data, which is 1 char
and 1 short per data point.
On February 23, 2010, Rene Veerman wrote:
have y
In the desktop app's memory the data is packed end-to-end already:
typedef struct MANGOpie
{
unsigned char mango;
unsigned short pie;
}
MANGOpie;
MANGOpie * pies = (MANGOpie *)malloc(count*sizeof(MANGOpie));
...and the entire 'pies' array is sent to the PHP script as binary data
usin
Andre Polykanine wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I've just subscribed to the list, and I already have a question.
> what I need to do is to send mail using sockets. Actually, the
> built-in Mail() function is great and I wouldn't have to search for
> something else if I didn't need more than one messag
49 matches
Mail list logo
