der.
Sorry, that's just ridiculous. Why should we code a plugin that fixes
your emails to put them in the right order when you can just do it
from the start? You're even acknowledging that you're posting in the
wrong order now.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 14:12, Marten Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> dan...@daniel-laptop:~$ php test.php> /dev/null
>> Error 1
>> Error 2
>> dan...@daniel-laptop:~$ ./src/php-5.2.12/sapi/cli/php test.php> /dev/null
>> Error 1
>> Error 2
>
>
nk it's unreasonable that you commit some
resources to it. I don't think anyone is *against* that PHP supports
multi-threading. I think people are against having multi-threading if
it will stall other development in the PHP core. It's not like you can
implement it just like that. T
First of all, I'll apologize for the top-post. My DROID doesn't give me the
option of top or bottom. So not ready for enterprise.
Secondly, I'll append to the statements made by Larry that, unless it's
non-web based, there are far more layers involved before, during, and after
PHP's execution. Thr
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 14:29, Rene Veerman wrote:
> Hi..
>
> in an effort to write better code i'd like to know good strategies for
> unit testing.
> automated testing of code.
>
> the fact that my code can undergo rapid changes has kept me back so far.
This is a question that comes up now a
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 15:50, Jan G.B. wrote:
>
>
> 2010/3/23 Daniel Egeberg
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:47, Marten Lehmann wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I found different code examples like this, which use the file handle
>> >
; /test.php on line 4
>
> Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource
> in /test.php on line 4
>
> How can I access the original STDERR handle? The constant should be there,
> but does not exist.
>
> regards
> Marten
These I/O streams are only present in the CLI SAPI.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 09:03, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> ok, i might do that. as daniel suggested, that issue is noticeably
> outside the scope of this general list.
Just be prepared for what you'll encounter on Internals. I was
deliberately not suggesting that list at
This starts to get out of the scope of the General list. If you think it's a
bug, report it. Did you check out the latest snap? It's an hourly build
from the SVN repo.
(If this top-posts, my apologies. I'm sitting in the living room with my
little girl, typing from my DROID.)
On Mar 20, 2010 7:3
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 21:04, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
> Indeed. It would probably be better to read, "Unavailable as of
> PHP 6." I'll patch that in the XML sources now, and the next time the
> manual rebuilds, the changes will take effect.
Future builds w
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 20:57, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> i'm not sure that addresses my post -- it doesn't make grammatical
> sense to state that something is unavailable "since" something that is
> yet to be officially released.
In most cases, you'd be absolutely correct but PHP is a
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 16:59, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> i don't see a separate mailing list for documentation so is this
> where i would point at oddities in the manual? as in, here:
>
> http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.variables.external.php
>
> we read:
>
> "// Unavailable since PHP 6.
across in
> the POST header in wireshark, but but only the first 20 appear in the
> $_FILES array.
>
> Has anyone come across this problem of the $_FILE array being truncated? I
> don't recall changing anything on the live server.
>
> Richard
Check out max_file_uploads which
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 06:48, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
>
> Hi Per,
>
> The manual already supports that. If you install the sqlite extension
> on your webserver, it should work.
Dan;
The question wasn't whether or not it supports that kind of
lookup, but rather
supports that. If you install the sqlite extension
on your webserver, it should work.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 02:49, Per Jessen wrote:
> I run a local mirror of the PHP manual, and I most often go straight to
> the "Search for" box to look up the format of a function. With the
> mysqli functions, I've found than many of them simply
> aren't "available" that way. E.g. mysqli_conne
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 23:16, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 22:57, George Langley wrote:
>> Hi all. Is there an issue with $_GET not handling a Base64-encoded
>> value correctly? (PHP is 5.1.6)
>> Am receiving a Base64-encoded value:
>&
Joomla! page, whose
> getVar() command completely removes the +, so I couldn't even do a string
> replace, as I don't know where the + should have been!)
>
> Tired of looking at the dark red spot on the wall! Thanks.
PHP does a urldecode() on GET parameters, which r
ng to work. PHP_SELF does not include query string.
> So it is safe to use it this way.
>
> Regards,
> Dmitry
No, it is not safe...
This won't work:
index.php?" onsubmit="evil()">http://www.evil.com/evi.js"</a>;>
But this will:
index.php/" onsubmit="evil()">http://www.evil.com/evi.js"</a>;>
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
ollow" href="http://www.evil.com/evi.js"">http://www.evil.com/evi.js"</a>;>
>
> with regard to the original problem - some input validation is in order.
PHP_SELF doesn't contain the query string, so your particular attack
wouldn't work. It's still a security issue though.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
of view. It has to evaluate
> $client->system to determine the parameter list for multiCall(). Then it
> has to evaluate those parameters before it can stuff their values into
> the stack so it can call the function.
That's not true. It's entirely possible making language
the is_infinite() function. It's not entirely undocumented
though. See http://php.net/float. Basically you'll get INF when you
exceed the range according to the IEEE floating point standard.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 23:21, Skip Evans wrote:
> D'oh!
>
> ...and I suppose there is just no way around that, eh?
>
> Skip
You can use SNI, but it's not supported by all web servers and browsers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication
--
Daniel Egeberg
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:28, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> And you get to adopt new ones if you don't like the ones you got?
Yes, but you can't put any up for adoption by another family.
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
Look
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 09:42, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> How can we get a post count? :p
Were you here when I was still running the weekly metrics on the
list a few years ago? I still get requests to reinstate it, I just
haven't had the chance. I keep meaning to enlist Richard Heyes to
inco
Don't top-post. Even that part is in the rules when you signed up. ;-P
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 05:21, Jochen Schultz wrote:
> Sure Zend is one of the most valuables, if not the most valuable, companies
> in the PHP community.
>
> But if we allow ads here, we should think about selling them (
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 04:29, Jochen Schultz wrote:
>> and not drugs, money or sex!
>
> So everyone should post their ads here, which are related to PHP?
>
> I think not.
Well, good thing you're nowhere near being close to having a say
in that, eh? ;-P
First of all, this is the General
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 14:59, mrfroasty wrote:
> Looks expensive, definately NO
Then do not reply. It was an offer to the community at large, not
just you and the other top-poster. ;-P
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:57, Skip Evans wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Does anyone have a function that replaces accented characters
> with the non-accent equals?
This one by Sven on 21-APR-2005:
"Ae", "\xC6"=>"AE",
"\xD6"=>"Oe", "\xDC"=>"Ue", "\xDE"=>"TH", "\xDF"=>"ss", "\xE4"=>"ae",
"\xE6"=>"ae",
e and the session ID are two different things.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:10, William C. Schnute
wrote:
> PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE - HELP ME GET OFF THIS LIST --- YOU PEOPLE ARE
> DRIVING ME CRAZY1
Good.
> Please unsubscribe: m...@honeyflowfarm.com,
> wschn...@mail.honeyflowfarm.com or anyone else @honeyflowfarm.c
ion.
>
> Could you tell me how to retrieve the 'return type'?
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> Dasn
That's not possible. Consider this function:
function foo()
{
switch (rand(0, 1)) {
case 0: return 42;
case 1: return 'bar';
e:
http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/tags/php_5_3_1/php.ini-production?view=markup#l671
If an attacker can do an HTTP GET request, he can most likely also do
an HTTP POST request (and vice versa) and the input value will be no
more (in)secure regardless of the source. Using $_GET/$_POS
nite representation in base 2 (like you cannot finitely represent
1/3 in base 10). So the number 0.1 is represented in the computer as a
number that is strictly less than 0.1 so when you do 0.1+0.7=x then
you have x<0.8 in the computer (think 7.999...). When you cast to
int you just trunca
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 16:23, Manuel Lemos wrote:
>
> What about you? How many times have you shared your Open Source code?
HA! That's hilarious that you would say that to *me.* I actually
laughed out loud. I'll probably do it a few more times before the day
is out.
Well, Manuel, you
Normally I would just stay out of a public thread on such a
subject, but Rixham and I had a discussion about the site prior to his
posting here, and I may as well make my point known
My problem - and indeed, it is a problem - is not with the design,
usability, or lack thereof. It's al
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:18, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
> Done. Thanks Dan. http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50886
Thank you, sir. I thanked you on Facebook when I saw the report
come in, but wanted to thank you properly here as well.
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http:/
(Typing from the DROID, so forgive the top-posting.)
Shawn, would you take a few moments to submit this as a bug at
http://bugs.php.net/? I know you well enough that, if you say the docs suck,
they probably do.
On Jan 29, 2010 10:47 PM, "Shawn McKenzie" wrote:
Eric Lee wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:27, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
>
> Depends I guess on how far you need to optimise the code. I'd imagine that to
> something like Facebook, every split-second of optimisation is worth it, as
> even a 100th of a second becomes minutes of wasted time over the course of a
>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:26, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
>
> Well, I would still say it's far too insignificant to bother with.
And for the most part, you'd be right but it still isn't good
practice to *not* teach something strictly because it's not entirely
sig
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 18:13, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:08, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
>>
>> There is virtually no difference nowadays. It's a long time since
>> anything like that has mattered.
>
> Actually, that's not true enough to be
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:08, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
>
> There is virtually no difference nowadays. It's a long time since
> anything like that has mattered.
Actually, that's not true enough to be dismissive. It depends on
several factors.
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net
only a general rule of thumb and shouldn't be adhered to
> absolutely, but I remember a thread a while back that showed the speed
> differences between the two because of the extra parsing PHP does on
> double quoted strings.
There is virtually no difference nowadays. It's a long tim
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 19:48, Daevid Vincent wrote:
>
> Another thing I just noticed, is that we (that is Dan and I) should NOT
> have used count()
> This is bad form and wasted cycles.
This is certainly correct, but it should also be noted that my
original code used it once (thus, it was in
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 17:17, Daevid Vincent wrote:
>
> Well allow me to retort... :)
>
> Your test was for 5 measly array elements.
>
> Just for S&G I tried it with the strpos one too and modified your test
> slightly to handle bigger arrays...
>
[snip=code]
>
> I ran out of memory with more tha
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 22:51, Daevid Vincent wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: paras...@gmail.com [mailto:paras...@gmail.com] On
>> Behalf Of Daniel Brown
>> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 6:43 PM
>> To: John Taylor-Johnston
>> Cc: PHP-General
>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 21:36, John Taylor-Johnston
wrote:
> I am reading the manual: http://ca.php.net/manual/en/ref.strings.php
>
> $mydata->restored = "-00-00";
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
Looking for hosting or
0, 3) == pack('CCC', 0xEF, 0xBB, 0xBF)) {
// has bom
}
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
). Exactly how you do that is
up to you (hard code it, look in a database, LDAP, etc.). You then
send the 401 response code along with WWW-Authenticate if the
credentials aren't satisfactory.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 15:52, LAMP wrote:
> I tried again and got this error message:
>
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at outbound-mail-319.bluehost.com.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn'
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:10, Richard wrote:
>
> I had this (I think) recently; mail simply stopped coming from the
> list and I can't remember unsubscribing (though that's not saying
> much...). I simply re-subscribed and all was dandy again.
Quite possibly caused by malformed headers or SP
sing automated build tools like Phing, Ant
or GNU Make.
Either way, I wouldn't worry about the extra I/O unless you've got *a
lot* of traffic.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Daevid Vincent wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
>> include files, or a few big ones?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/6/2
You might also just choose the longest match (in terms of
number of periods).
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 14:13, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> (untested - I always forget the order of the params!)
As a general rule, string functions are always haystack-needle and
array functions are always needle-haystack. I can't think of any
exceptions to that rule.
--
Daniel Egeberg
o for more information about that function.
You could also explode() it and do something with that, or you could
or use some of the other many string manipulation functions. I think
pathinfo() is easiest.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:34, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 02:22, Varuna Seneviratna wrote:
>> Since there are two stable versions 5.3 and 5.2 .What is the difference
>> between these two streams and What is the need for maintaining two streams?
>
> Th
I'm sure you can appreciate the benefit of having a shared vocabulary.
It's something that's going on in not just programming, but
practically in every field that exists.
I hope this makes some sense. It's my take on this anyway.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
So you can download
the PHP 5.3.1 VC9 non-thread-safe build from http://windows.php.net
and follow the steps in
http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.iis6.php.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
POST data only the request.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Daniel Egeberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:24, Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>> This way multiple inheritance is available for those that legitimately need
>> it [...]
>
> Could you by any chance provide an example where multiple inheritance
> would be required? To be h
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:24, Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> This way multiple inheritance is available for those that legitimately need
> it [...]
Could you by any chance provide an example where multiple inheritance
would be required? To be honest, I've never really seen a use for it,
but
Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Monday 28 December 2009 9:45:03 pm Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Okay so PHP designers explicitly decided against multiple inheritances,
>> but aren't there legitimate needs for multiple inheritance in OOP?
>>
>> For exam
treams for more information
about that. Why your specific script would write to STDERR, I don't
know.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello,
Okay so PHP designers explicitly decided against multiple inheritances,
but aren't there legitimate needs for multiple inheritance in OOP?
For example, consider the following three classes (A,B,C) with the
following properties (a number is a distinct property or method).
A: 1, 2, 3
B: 1,
Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way to see what objects and functions a script
>> loaded/required/used?
>>
>> I could recursively loop through the globals, but if objects were unset,
>> then i may miss some.
>
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm missing some unifying piece of the zend/php puzzle...
>>
>> I understand the basics of zend engine opcode, caching the opcode,
>> optimizing the opcode, and caching the optimized opcode,
Hello,
I'm missing some unifying piece of the zend/php puzzle...
I understand the basics of zend engine opcode, caching the opcode,
optimizing the opcode, and caching the optimized opcode, etc... The
part I'm struggling with is somewhere in the zend world.
Under a typical php install where doe
Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Friday 25 December 2009 8:02:06 pm Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>> Hello PHPers,
>>
>> I've learned that php doesn't support multiple inheritance, b/c if you
>> need multiple inheritance usually it is a sign you've got a design
>>
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> Hello PHPers,
>
> I've learned that php doesn't support multiple inheritance, b/c if you
> need multiple inheritance usually it is a sign you've got a design
> imperfection...or so they say.
>
> Well, I'm using a framework
Hello PHPers,
I've learned that php doesn't support multiple inheritance, b/c if you
need multiple inheritance usually it is a sign you've got a design
imperfection...or so they say.
Well, I'm using a framework (Codeigniter), and i'm extending the core
libraries. The trouble is, I want to also e
us
>
strtotime() interprets dates according to the rules of the current
timezone. The specific rules are outlined in GNU's manual:
http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_node/Date-input-formats.html
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
end variable. Would it work?
Oh, I see now. Sorry.
I had this in my bookmarks: http://www.swfupload.org/
I don't know if it's any good, but you can check it out.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
ut that
doesn't mean the client has downloaded all of it. It may for instance
be that the client didn't finish downloading or that it is downloading
slower than you are sending.
--
Daniel Egeberg
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 14:35, Bob McConnell wrote:
> I don't keep copies of every message in any of the
> dozens of mailing lists and news groups I follow, so there is no simple
> way to go back through the conversation to figure out where it all came
> from.
Fortunately, other people keep compl
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 19:13, Angus Mann wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'w writing a PHP app that is designed to run over a LAN, so internet
> connection for the server is not really essential. Some users may
> deliberately not connect it to the internet as a security precaution.
>
> But I'd like the app
Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Sunday 20 December 2009 10:45:45 am Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>> Hello PHPers,
>>
>> This is a two part question:
>>
>> 1) Is it faster to include one file with lots of code, or many separate
>> smaller individual files? As
Hello PHPers,
This is a two part question:
1) Is it faster to include one file with lots of code, or many separate
smaller individual files? Assume the one massive file is merely the
concatenation of all the smaller individual files. (I am assuming the
one massive file would be faster..., but i
Hello PHPers,
I have a collection of about 60 objects (class definitions). They are
all very similar. They all share a substantial % of the same core. But
they all have slight variations as well. The approach I took was to
make an abstract core class, and each of the 60 objects extends that
co
gt;
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Devendra Jadhav
> देवेंद्र जाधव
>
--
-
Daniel González Cerviño
FreelanceMadrid.es
Mail : daniel.gonza...@freelancemadrid.es
Tel (+34) 653 96 50 48
-
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:11, Chris Payne wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm pulling data from a mysql database, but need only the first 20
> characters of each string for a short description, what is the best
> method to just grab the first 20 characters from a string regardless
> of whether they are
Hello PHP-hipsters,
I am not sure how to phrase these questions so please bare with me.
I am thinking about performance of a single web server running Apache
(non-cluster) with php as a module.
I have a web app that requires the same php objects(classes) for each
http request.
First, I would li
a function def) to add that file to the
tracking object...but it would be nice if i didn't have to modify my
existing code to see which objects and functions a script actually used,
or at least, requested and loaded into memory.
Thanks in advance,
Daniel Kolbo
`
--
PHP General Mai
Steve wrote:
> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is it possible to get a list (array) of classes not found in a script
>> before the fatal error exits the parser. I realize that PHP parses the
>> script twice. It would be nice at the end of the first pars
Hello,
Is it possible to get a list (array) of classes not found in a script
before the fatal error exits the parser. I realize that PHP parses the
script twice. It would be nice at the end of the first parsing pass to
check to see which classes haven't been defined (yet), so that I could
define
Hi,
Does anybody knows a web services server based on PHP?
The only one a see is Nusoap, but even for this one i can't find the webpage
to see the documentation.
by the way, i'm trying to develop an application using web services in PHP,
any start point suggestion will be appreciated.
thanks fo
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 14:56, Dan Papakonstantino wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> Sorry for the misunderstanding however, we are web developers as well as
> hardware and software developers. You may have overlooked our web based
> timesheet application called SonicWeb. Please review the following link o
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 14:46, Israel Ekpo wrote:
>
> Speaking of starting a conversation, what do you think about the "goto"
> construct introduced just recently?
Better yet: what do you all think of folks hijacking threads?
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.paras
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:34, David Otton
wrote:
> Is anyone from the list heading to PHPNW this weekend?
Coincidentally, the PHPNW UG meeting is listed for tomorrow, but I
have no listing for a conference this weekend. If you're in contact
with any of those folks, Dave, you can ask them to
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:34, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> No, it is a little far out for me. Is there something similar in
> Londinium?
Best way to keep informed is through php.net. Don't make our
efforts be in vain! ;-P
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:15, Jim Lucas wrote:
>
> You stated that you are running PHP 5.2.10 , too bad the function recommend
> (locale_get_default()) is only available in PHP 5.3 or newer.
That's my fault entirely, not Floyd's. I didn't look to see what
version of PHP he was running.
--
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 17:00, Floyd Resler wrote:
> Sorry to hear that! I live in Cincinnati so I normally don't get to watch
> the Colts play when they are on at the same time as the Bengals. But this
> week I did and, best of all, they won!
Yeah, well, the Browns sure didn't, so bite me.
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:49, tedd wrote:
>
> That's absolutely true.
>
> The problem here is in the statement of:
>
> $num = $num++;
Yeah, I understood Daevid's email a bit better *after* I sent
mine. Then I was hoping no one noticed.
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 17:42, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
> but rather by something just slightly more advanced:
>
> $num = file_get_contents('visitcount.txt');
> if(isset($_GET['countme'])) {
> echo "You are visitor #".++$num."\n&q
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 17:28, Daevid Vincent wrote:
>
> Personally I've never (in almost 20 years) done an assignment like "$foo =
> $foo++" as I always use just "$foo++" or "$foo += 1" or something, hence the
> reason today is the day a co-worker stumbled upon this and was as confused
> as I was
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 16:14, Paul M Foster wrote:
>
> Okay, I've figured out how to shove the data through cURL to the
> receiving URL, but then it occurred to me that the client browser must
> go there *as well*.
>
> Will curl_exec() do that on its own, or is there a parameter I need to
> feed i
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 00:41, Paul M Foster wrote:
>
> fsockopen() appears to be part of the standard network functions in PHP,
> like the header() function. Do you mean that many hosts support the
> function (as part of PHP) but don't support its use with external hosts?
> Is there a way to deter
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 00:16, Paul M Foster wrote:
>
> However, assuming it *wasn't*, I've found the following example from a
> google search (thank goodness for google's "hinting" or I couldn't have
> found it):
>
> $fp = fsockopen("www.site.com", 80);
> fputs($fp, "POST /script.php HTTP/1.0
> Ho
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 23:29, Paul M Foster wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how to do this. Please no exotic external libraries my
> shared hosting provider doesn't include. RTFM will be fine; just tell me
> which Fine Manual to Read.
Nothing too exotic at all, Paul. Check out cURL:
http://php
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 23:07, James Colannino wrote:
> Hey everyone, I was pretty sure there was an easy built-in solution for
> what I want to do, but I've been googling around with no luck.
> Basically, I just want to take a string containing the output of
> print_r() and convert it back into a
701 - 800 of 4552 matches
Mail list logo
