On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 08:41 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
> > On 6/18/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 6/18/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On 6/18/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > On 6/18/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Daniel Brown wrote:
On 6/18/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/18/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/18/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/18/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 6/18/07, Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > clive
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 11:25 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On 6/18/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/18/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >Referring to one of my earlier posts in this thread, as a
> > > > > refresher, database information is stored in files. So to
On 6/18/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/18/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/18/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/18/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 6/18/07, Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > clive wrote:
> > > > >>
>
On 6/18/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/18/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/18/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/18/07, Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > clive wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I have no clue how big the files are, but you migh
On 6/18/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/18/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/18/07, Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > clive wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I have no clue how big the files are, but you might want to store them
> > >> in a database. That can speed up t
On 6/18/07, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/18/07, Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> clive wrote:
> >>
> >> I have no clue how big the files are, but you might want to store them
> >> in a database. That can speed up things, but don't ask me how much ;)
> >>
> >> Tijnema
> >
On 6/18/07, Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
clive wrote:
>>
>> I have no clue how big the files are, but you might want to store them
>> in a database. That can speed up things, but don't ask me how much ;)
>>
>> Tijnema
>>
> no dude, while database are convenient, files systems are fast
clive wrote:
>>
>> I have no clue how big the files are, but you might want to store them
>> in a database. That can speed up things, but don't ask me how much ;)
>>
>> Tijnema
>>
> no dude, while database are convenient, files systems are faster, I mean
> thats what they were designed for, serving
I have no clue how big the files are, but you might want to store them
in a database. That can speed up things, but don't ask me how much ;)
Tijnema
no dude, while database are convenient, files systems are faster, I mean
thats what they were designed for, serving files.
For lots of files I
On 6/17/07, Brian Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For everyone who advised me to "beware the inode", allow me to
forward what the Rackspace admins told me. This is Greek to me, and
I'm hoping one of you can translate. All I understood was where he
said "I appear to have more than enough." Yes?
For everyone who advised me to "beware the inode", allow me to
forward what the Rackspace admins told me. This is Greek to me, and
I'm hoping one of you can translate. All I understood was where he
said "I appear to have more than enough." Yes?
---snip---
All of your slices on the disk are
[snip]
> Two words. Beware the inode.
^^ ^^^ ^
1 23
Here endeth the lesson.
[/snip]
Can I get an Admin brotha'!?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
Server is running Linux, and PHP is constantly creating and modifying
images in a directory. Apache is constantly serving these same
images. There are about 250,000 of them in the same directory. Seems
to be running OK, no problematic CPU load, but I'm wondering
On Saturday 16 June 2007 03:47, Daniel Brown wrote:
> Once again, this doesn't matter so much for per-directory (though
> listing will take longer, as I think I mentioned) as it does the
> filesystem mount.
Several years ago, having say 3000+ files in single directory on ext2
would mean tha
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] OK to have many files in one folder?
Thanks for the replies but I'm not sure I know what to do with them. Is
the problem with the number of files, or is the problem with the
activity? Can you dumb down
On 6/15/07, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
I can easily break it up into 100 subdirectories, 2500 files in each,
would that be good insurance against problems?
[/snip]
As someone mentioned, directories are just a human convenience. Each
file will have an inode and is identified
On 6/15/07, Brian Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the replies but I'm not sure I know what to do with them.
Is the problem with the number of files, or is the problem with the
activity? Can you dumb down your answers at all for me? :)
On Jun 15, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Daniel Brown wr
On 6/15/07, Brian Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can easily break it up into 100 subdirectories, 2500 files in each,
would that be good insurance against problems?
I have no clue how big the files are, but you might want to store them
in a database. That can speed up things, but don't as
[snip]
I can easily break it up into 100 subdirectories, 2500 files in each,
would that be good insurance against problems?
[/snip]
As someone mentioned, directories are just a human convenience. Each
file will have an inode and is identified by an inode number in the file
system where it reside
I can easily break it up into 100 subdirectories, 2500 files in each,
would that be good insurance against problems?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 6/15/07, Crayon Shin Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:51, Daniel Brown wrote:
> And remember, the fact that they're all
> in one directory doesn't matter at all to the system, as directories,
> folders, et cetera, are just representations for human readability and
>
Thanks for the replies but I'm not sure I know what to do with them.
Is the problem with the number of files, or is the problem with the
activity? Can you dumb down your answers at all for me? :)
On Jun 15, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
6/15/07, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:51, Daniel Brown wrote:
> And remember, the fact that they're all
> in one directory doesn't matter at all to the system, as directories,
> folders, et cetera, are just representations for human readability and
> organization. In fact, those files reside on several sec
6/15/07, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Server is running Linux, and PHP is constantly creating and modifying
images in a directory. Apache is constantly serving these same
images. There are about 250,000 of them in the same directory. Seems
to be running OK, no problematic CPU l
[snip]
Server is running Linux, and PHP is constantly creating and modifying
images in a directory. Apache is constantly serving these same
images. There are about 250,000 of them in the same directory. Seems
to be running OK, no problematic CPU load, but I'm wondering if
anyone knows wheth
Server is running Linux, and PHP is constantly creating and modifying
images in a directory. Apache is constantly serving these same
images. There are about 250,000 of them in the same directory. Seems
to be running OK, no problematic CPU load, but I'm wondering if
anyone knows whether I'm
27 matches
Mail list logo