This is the official PHP 4.0.6 version. After line 448 insert:
#if MEMORY_LIMIT
AG(allocated_memory) -= REAL_SIZE(ptr-size);
#endif
If you'll take a good look at the diff file the first half is what you're
supposed to have and the second half is what
There is a bug in PHP 4.0.6 which affects PHP users who use the memory
limit option. (i.e. developers who include --enable-memory-limit in their
configure line).
The patch is posted at http://www.php.net/downloads.php. If you don't use
this option there is no need for you to download and apply
Patch cannot be successfully applied. Any suggestions ?
Output from patch application:
start
rouvas@aspasia(12) /opt/ide2/rouvas/tmp/php-4.0.6/Zend patch -i
patch.zend_alloc.c
patching file zend_alloc.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 446.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file zend_alloc.c.rej
Very strange. I just checked it and it worked for me with GNU patch 2.5.
Do you know how to apply it yourself? You just need to add those three
lines (without the leading +).
Andi
At 07:48 PM 7/1/2001 +0300, Rouvas Stathis wrote:
Patch cannot be successfully applied. Any suggestions ?
Output
It is indeed strange, since in the sources I have (downloaded about a
week ago), I already have the exact source that the patch presents
(without the lines prefixed with +).
I'm looking at $PHPHOME/Zend/zend_alloc.c file.
Am I to suppose that there is no need to patch anything?
-Stathis.
Andi
At 10:17 PM 7/1/2001 +0300, Rouvas Stathis wrote:
It is indeed strange, since in the sources I have (downloaded about a
week ago), I already have the exact source that the patch presents
(without the lines prefixed with +).
I'm looking at $PHPHOME/Zend/zend_alloc.c file.
Am I to suppose that
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 10:17 PM 7/1/2001 +0300, Rouvas Stathis wrote:
It is indeed strange, since in the sources I have (downloaded about a
week ago), I already have the exact source that the patch presents
(without the lines prefixed with +).
I'm looking at $PHPHOME/Zend/zend_alloc.c
At 10:49 PM 7/1/2001 +0300, Rouvas Stathis wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 10:17 PM 7/1/2001 +0300, Rouvas Stathis wrote:
It is indeed strange, since in the sources I have (downloaded about a
week ago), I already have the exact source that the patch presents
(without the lines prefixed
8 matches
Mail list logo
