On Saturday 28 October 2006 18:15, Robert Cummings wrote:
As far as I can tell, single and double quotes
are interchangeable (but unmixable) in both HTML
and XHTML. When did single quotes go bad?
Hmmm, I've been under the impression for quite some time that single
quotes are somehow
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:10:17 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:43 +0200, clive wrote:
or you could write it likes this '
echo option value='$day' $selected $day /option;
much easier to read, but slightly more taxing on the server.
Also slightly more taxing on
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 01:04:25 -0700, Paul Novitski wrote:
It's so interesting that some details bug some people and others bug
others. In an expression such as this:
echo 'option value=' . $day . '' . $selected . '' . $day
. '/option';
...I count eight transitions (instances
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 01:04:25 -0700, Paul Novitski wrote:
It's so interesting that some details bug some people and others bug
others. In an expression such as this:
echo 'option value=' . $day . '' . $selected . '' . $day
. '/option';
...I count eight transitions (instances of
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 13:27 +0200, Nisse Engström wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:10:17 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:43 +0200, clive wrote:
or you could write it likes this '
echo option value='$day' $selected $day /option;
much easier to read, but
At 10:23 AM -0700 10/26/06, Paul Novitski wrote:
At 10/26/2006 08:24 AM, tedd wrote:
I think a div would work just as well -- span seems so
old-world to me. :-)
By default, div is a block element and span is inline, so span
seemed like the natural fit for a sentence fragment. I don't think
At 1:09 PM -0400 10/26/06, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:24 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 1:04 AM -0700 10/26/06, Paul Novitski wrote:
At 10/25/2006 11:24 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
I use a tag based template system, there's no PHP in my content so my
content files for the most
At 10:23 AM -0700 10/26/06, Paul Novitski wrote:
For a robust general CMS, though, I want a completely unambiguous
demarcation of replacable content.
At 10/27/2006 09:01 AM, tedd wrote:
If you want a completely unambiguous demarcation then use xml with
a defined schema. I don't think you
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 22:53 -0700, Paul Novitski wrote:
At 10/25/2006 04:09 PM, Stut wrote:
print 'option value='.$day.'';
if ($selected_day_of_month == $day)
print ' selected';
print ''.$day.'/option';
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 17:35 -0700,
At 10/25/2006 11:24 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
Now, the thing that I dislike about heredoc for such small strings is
the switching between heredoc mode and the switching back. It's ugly on
the scale of switching in and out of PHP tags.
It's so interesting that some details bug some people and
Paul Novitski wrote:
It's so interesting that some details bug some people and others bug
others. In an expression such as this:
echo 'option value=' . $day . '' . $selected . '' . $day .
'/option';
or you could write it likes this '
echo option value='$day' $selected $day
Incidentally, a nice side effect of heredoc is that some editors (like
vim) recognise EOHTML, EOSQL etc and highlight the contents
accordingly.
Arpad
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 1:04 AM -0700 10/26/06, Paul Novitski wrote:
At 10/25/2006 11:24 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
I use a tag based template system, there's no PHP in my content so my
content files for the most part just look like more HTML.
This is a different topic, but also one close to my heart. Yes, I
tedd wrote:
I think a div would work just as well -- span seems so old-world
to me. :-)
The span element is in no way old-world. Spans and divs are two
different things with different goals. A div is a block-level element,
whereas spans are inline. Spans are intended for stylistic changes
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 01:04 -0700, Paul Novitski wrote:
At 10/25/2006 11:24 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
Now, the thing that I dislike about heredoc for such small strings is
the switching between heredoc mode and the switching back. It's ugly on
the scale of switching in and out of PHP tags.
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 10:50 +0100, Arpad Ray wrote:
Incidentally, a nice side effect of heredoc is that some editors (like
vim) recognise EOHTML, EOSQL etc and highlight the contents
accordingly.
That's really cool. Never even thought to do that. I wonder if anyone
has done the footwork for
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:24 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 1:04 AM -0700 10/26/06, Paul Novitski wrote:
At 10/25/2006 11:24 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
I use a tag based template system, there's no PHP in my content so my
content files for the most part just look like more HTML.
This is a different
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:43 +0200, clive wrote:
Paul Novitski wrote:
It's so interesting that some details bug some people and others bug
others. In an expression such as this:
echo 'option value=' . $day . '' . $selected . '' . $day .
'/option';
or you could write it likes
At 10/26/2006 08:24 AM, tedd wrote:
At 1:04 AM -0700 10/26/06, Paul Novitski wrote:
My comparable example (but in an HTML context) would look like:
Hello span class=firstNameFIRSTNAME/span,
where the engine replaces the content of the span with the value
from the database based on a
At 10/25/2006 04:09 PM, Stut wrote:
print 'option value='.$day.'';
if ($selected_day_of_month == $day)
print ' selected';
print ''.$day.'/option';
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 17:35 -0700, Paul Novitski wrote:
print hdDay
20 matches
Mail list logo
