Am 2008-11-03 13:28:27, schrieb cheesiong:
hi Chris,
thank you. i change the path and change the httpd.conf LogLevel to debug
then restart apache.
but nothing is change from the output or the error log.
basically it is still not working.
this is weird, isn't it. the apache is run with
i try to use the system() function, i found the the last line of the
ifconfig is actually nothing.
but i still cannot execute the ipkg-cl program. any idea?
thank you.
regards,-keo
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:31 AM, cheesiong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
this is the first time i try out
vladimirn wrote:
I have one simple question, actually i am interested in your point of view.
Is there any sense in caching xslt itself? If so, then why? If not, then
again why? :)
I think that there is no sense, and that xslt output should be cached.
What do you think?
From your original
Rob Gould schrieb:
Question about mySQL and PHP, when using the mySQL ORDER BY method...
Basically I've got data coming from the database where a wine
producer-name is a word like:
Château Bahans Haut-Brion
or
La Chapelle de La Mission Haut-Brion
or
Le Clarence
vladimirn wrote:
Hi all,
i was wondering whats the best approach to do next.
I have an xml file delivered from service of my partner. On my web server
(windows) i have xslt files used for xml transformation.
Those files are getting bigger, so i have request to cash them and use
cashed. I was
vladimirn wrote:
Thank you Col
I will go into Zend_Cache as you suggested.
One more thing- does Zend_Cache saces data into file or use a server memory?
As I said in my original mail, but perhaps wasn't clear, Zend_Cache can
support file, memcache, APC and other backends.
Col
--
Colin
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 00:18 -0400, Rob Gould wrote:
Question about mySQL and PHP, when using the mySQL ORDER BY method...
Basically I've got data coming from the database where a wine
producer-name is a word like:
Château Bahans Haut-Brion
or
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Evening All,
I'd be /really/ interested to know who uses what!
*Procedural or OOP?*
OOP - I have a Java background...
*Dev OS*
OpenSuSE 10.3
*Dev PHP Version*
5.2.5
*Live Server OS*
OpenSuSE 10.3
*Live Server PHP Version*
5.2.5 (of course - why dev on
Am 2008-10-17 00:14:18, schrieb Nathan Rixham:
Evening All,
I'd be /really/ interested to know who uses what!
*Procedural or OOP?*
OOP
*Dev OS*
Debian GNU/Linux Etch/Testing/Unstable
*Dev PHP Version*
5.2.0-8+etch10
*Live Server OS*
Debian GNU/Linux Etch
*Live Server PHP
[snip]
*Procedural or OOP?*
depends on the job to be done
*Dev OS*
unix or derivate
*Dev PHP Version*
= 5
*Live Server OS*
unix or derivate
*Live Server PHP Version*
= 5
*Which HTTP Server Software (+version)?*
Apache = 2
*IDE / Dev Environment*
PHPEd/Net Beans
*Preferred Framework(s)?*
Zend
just a quick note to say I'll compile all this into something more
meaningful and publish later on tonight :-) nice to see so many responses.
--
nathan ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
{
Senior Web Developer
php + java + flex + xmpp + xml + ecmascript
web development edinburgh | http://kraya.co.uk/
[snip]
just a quick note to say I'll compile all this into something more
meaningful and publish later on tonight :-) nice to see so many
responses.
[/snip]
It's Friday night, shouldn't you be going to the pub instead?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
just a quick note to say I'll compile all this into something more
meaningful and publish later on tonight :-) nice to see so many
responses.
[/snip]
It's Friday night, shouldn't you be going to the pub instead?
wanna baby sit?
--
nathan ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
{
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's Friday night, shouldn't you be going to the pub instead?
In another eight years he'll be glad to do that. Little-known
fact: Nate is the world's smartest 12-year-old.
/kidding
--
/Daniel P. Brown
More
Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's Friday night, shouldn't you be going to the pub instead?
In another eight years he'll be glad to do that. Little-known
fact: Nate is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For reasons we needn't go into, I need to convert this to Java:
$to_encode = example.com/api?foo=bar;
$key = asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf; //fake value, but 24 bytes
$td = mcrypt_module_open('tripledes', '', 'ecb', '');
mcrypt_generic_init ($td, $key, $iv);
$c_t =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For reasons we needn't go into, I need to convert this to Java:
$to_encode = example.com/api?foo=bar;
$key = asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf; //fake value, but 24 bytes
$td = mcrypt_module_open('tripledes', '', 'ecb', '');
mcrypt_generic_init ($td, $key, $iv);
$c_t =
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Evening All,
I'd be /really/ interested to know who uses what!
*Procedural or OOP?*
Procedural for small stuff - OOP for larger stuff when using framework
*Dev OS*
Kubuntu Hardy Heron
*Dev PHP Version*
5.2.4
*Live Server OS*
FC 6
*Live Server PHP Version*
Here's mine:
*Procedural or OOP?*
OOP
*Dev OS*
Windows Server 2003 EE (sadly - I need some win-only tools!)
*Dev PHP Version*
PHP 5.2.5
*Live Server OS*
Ubuntu + Centos
*Live Server PHP Version*
PHP 5.2.x
*Which HTTP Server Software (+version)?*
Apache 2.2 all round
*IDE / Dev
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Evening All,
I'd be /really/ interested to know who uses what!
*Procedural or OOP?*
Procedural for small stuff - OOP for larger stuff when using framework
*Dev OS*
Kubuntu Hardy Heron
*Dev PHP Version*
5.2.4
currently (whatever is current
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:14:18 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
*Procedural or OOP?*
OOP, except really small stuff.
*Dev OS*
Fedora 9
*Dev PHP Version*
5.2.6
*Live Server OS*
Hosted services - var. Linux, Windows 2003 Server
*Live Server PHP Version*
Mostly 5.2.3+, some 4.x (haven't looked
Greetings, Nathan Rixham.
In reply to Your message dated Friday, October 17, 2008, 3:14:18,
*Procedural or OOP?*
whatever feels applicable.
*Dev OS*
Win2k, Server 2003
*Dev PHP Version*
5.2.6
*Live Server OS*
Whatever.
*Live Server PHP Version*
5.1.6, 5.2.4, 5.2.6
*Which HTTP
Luke wrote:
I can't say I've ever used a framework.
I like to be in control of all of my code, plus it's much more satisfying
when you write everything yourself (I've found anyway)...
If I want to make use of existing code, I rather have a good
understanding and a grasp of the philosophy
I can't say I've ever used a framework.
I like to be in control of all of my code, plus it's much more satisfying
when you write everything yourself (I've found anyway)...
2008/10/8 paragasu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PHP framework vs just php ?
http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=315
according to the
Farid,
I like to use PRADO(www.pradosoft.com), it is very easy to use for
those who are coming from Microsoft .Net platform as it uses the same
architecture. I did not like symfony, too much to read before the
first example.
Angelo
2008/10/6 farid lópez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
what is your
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:20 -0300, uaca man wrote:
Farid,
I like to use PRADO(www.pradosoft.com), it is very easy to use for
those who are coming from Microsoft .Net platform as it uses the same
architecture. I did not like symfony, too much to read before the
first example.
Angelo
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:47:54 +0100, Ashley Sheridan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't frameworks introduce a lot more overhead to projects though?
Ash
www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Any generic code library adds overhead. How much and whether or not it's
acceptable depends on the framework and
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Ashley Sheridan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:20 -0300, uaca man wrote:
Farid,
I like to use PRADO(www.pradosoft.com), it is very easy to use for
those who are coming from Microsoft .Net platform as it uses the same
architecture. I did not
PHP framework vs just php ?
http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=315
according to the benchmark.Just PHP win by more than 100% to average framework.
even the fastest solar only manage to serve 154pages/sec compare to
just php 1320pages/sec
call me outdated. but i stay with just php!
On 10/8/08, Eric
Tony Marston wrote:
I agree that finding the right framework to use can be very difficult, which
is why a lot of programmers (like me) prefer to roll their own. But if you
can find an off-the-shelf framework that does the job it can save you an
awful amount of time.
I agree with Tony.
I
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:41 AM, clive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Tony.
And you raise the dead. That thread died five and a half months
ago Let it rest in peace! ;-P
--
/Daniel P. Brown
More full-root dedicated server packages:
Intel 2.4GHz/60GB/512MB/2TB $49.99/mo.
Intel
On Oct 6, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:41 AM, clive [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I agree with Tony.
And you raise the dead. That thread died five and a half months
ago Let it rest in peace! ;-P
But... Which framework is better? :P
--
Jason Pruim
Lets raise the dead once more.
I have been using the Prado framework, prado uses the .net
architecture, so it is easy and fast to learn for those who came from
a Microsoft platform, anyway prado is very good to build UI, but there
is always a *but*!! Prado database abstraction model it is just
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Jason Pruim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But... Which framework is better? :P
Oh my.. now we're gonna get all those guys popping back up telling us how
dumb we are and how awesome their frameworks are again!
--
-Dan Joseph
www.canishosting.com - Plans start @
To be or not to be dump it your choice.
My framework it not just awesome it is super awesome.
Angelo
2008/10/6 Dan Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Jason Pruim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But... Which framework is better? :P
Oh my.. now we're gonna get all those
what is your framework??? uacaman.
i'm using symfony, but i'm reading the book. it's hard but there are so many
things you can do easily with symfony!
2008/10/7 uaca man [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To be or not to be dump it your choice.
My framework it not just awesome it is super awesome.
Angelo
Hello,
on 10/02/2008 11:31 PM Matt Graham said the following:
I just saw this. If someone is in the Phoenix, AZ, USA area and wants a job
writing/maintaining PHP code, this may be right for you. Contact details
below:
You may want to post it here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, (i hope this is the right place to ask questions like below)
I am trying to use content type 'multipart/x-mixed-replace' to
achive server pushing and I have the following piece of code, which works perfectly.
/* file.html */
function handleContent(event)
{
var
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Nathan Rixham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, (i hope this is the right place to ask questions like below)
I am trying to use content type 'multipart/x-mixed-replace' to achive
server pushing and I have the following piece of code, which
Oh, I thought having one for cgi and one for cli was common. Do people
generally run only one, regardless of whether they're hitting it from
a webserver or running it from the commandline?
Thanks,
Waynn
On 10/1/08, Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
Right, and I am, so I
Waynn Lue wrote:
Oh, I thought having one for cgi and one for cli was common. Do people
generally run only one, regardless of whether they're hitting it from
a webserver or running it from the commandline?
I think the general setup is a php cli executable in /usr/bin/php and
the php apache
Walter Galvão wrote:
Hi,
Im using the oracle instant client basic in my php app, with apache server.
When a query returns few rows, there is no problem.
Otherwise, the oci_execute method doesn return any records neither errors!
How can i solve this problem??
My implementation:
function
What version of PHP? *5*
What version of Instant Client? *
instantclient-basic-win32-10.2.0.3-20061115*
What version of the DB? *10G
*
Are you exceeding the PHP script time out, or exceeding the memory limit? *I
dont know. Doesnt appear any message. The script prints the last message
before the
Walter Galvão wrote:
Are you exceeding the PHP script time out, or exceeding the memory
limit?
I dont know. Doesnt appear any message. The script prints the
last message before the oci_execute call.
I'd start by looking at the max_execution_time and memory_limit settings in
php.ini.
Walter Galvão wrote:
What version of PHP? *5*
What version of Instant Client? *
instantclient-basic-win32-10.2.0.3-20061115*
What version of the DB? *10G
*
Are you exceeding the PHP script time out, or exceeding the memory limit? *I
dont know. Doesnt appear any message. The script prints the
The opposite might be true of user
code though as developers become presumptive of the compiler doing their
work for them :)
Like PHP... which does absolutely no optimizations.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 23:17 -0700, steve wrote:
The opposite might be true of user
code though as developers become presumptive of the compiler doing their
work for them :)
Like PHP... which does absolutely no optimizations.
You must not be using an optimizer. It may not be PHP
OK, I finally went to do it and this link doesn't work:
PHP 5.3.0alpha2 VC9 x86
http://downloads.php.net/pierre/php-5.3.0alpha2-nts-Win32-VC9.zip
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Johannes Schlüter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 23:36 -0700, steve wrote:
It is pretty much
Andrew Ballard wrote:
[snip]
4K limit on TEXTSIZE
[/snip]
As far as I was aware this was a PHP thing that can be changed in your
php.ini [mssql.textlimit and mssql.textsize]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Nathan Rixham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Ballard wrote:
[snip]
4K limit on TEXTSIZE
[/snip]
As far as I was aware this was a PHP thing that can be changed in your
php.ini [mssql.textlimit and mssql.textsize]
We have, and it affects the regular
Thanks all, I appreciate the follow ups and the help with the code. I'm
still relatively new with this stuff, and never had any formal training,
it's all just been learn as I go, and I have to learn fast as this project
is relatively urgent to get completed. I plan on going through all of my
Vinny Gullotta wrote:
What I want to do is find the top 10 servers where the column steps =
iisreset. The following code works great except that the page is not
displaying the servername in the 'Server Name' column of my results
(nothing appears, the column is just blank).
servername and
While it's true that '.' concatenates and ',' is a list separator, The
comma is actually more appropriate in this instance since you are just
outputting each piece. It saves the overhead of concatenation before
output.
Thank you,
Micah Gersten
onShore Networks
Internal Developer
learn something new every day! cheers Micah :)
Micah Gersten wrote:
While it's true that '.' concatenates and ',' is a list separator, The
comma is actually more appropriate in this instance since you are just
outputting each piece. It saves the overhead of concatenation before
output.
Thank
1: SQL
in mysql queries /should/ use backticks (`) around database, table and
column names, stop's them getting confused with variables or reserved
words (like timestamp) and saves you future trouble :)
.. which is a mysql-ism - no other database supports this. As soon as
you need to use
Ross McKay schreef:
Arnie Shore wrote:
Folks, I need to take a given float value to, say, two decimals, as per
subject JS. I've RTFM, but to no avail.
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:03:54 +0200, Sjoerd wrote:
$str = sprintf(%01.2f, $number);
Skinning cat, method two:
$str =
Jochem Maas wrote:
Ross McKay schreef:
Arnie Shore wrote:
Folks, I need to take a given float value to, say, two decimals, as per
subject JS. I've RTFM, but to no avail.
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:03:54 +0200, Sjoerd wrote:
$str = sprintf(%01.2f, $number);
Skinning cat, method two:
$str =
Nathan Rixham schreef:
Jochem Maas wrote:
Ross McKay schreef:
Arnie Shore wrote:
Folks, I need to take a given float value to, say, two decimals, as
per
subject JS. I've RTFM, but to no avail.
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:03:54 +0200, Sjoerd wrote:
$str = sprintf(%01.2f, $number);
Skinning
Arnie Shore wrote:
Folks, I need to take a given float value to, say, two decimals, as per
subject JS. I've RTFM, but to no avail.
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:03:54 +0200, Sjoerd wrote:
$str = sprintf(%01.2f, $number);
Skinning cat, method two:
$str = number_format($number, 2);
--
Ross McKay,
Good to know. And it makes it easier to use the Apache builds from
http://apachelounge.com.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, contrary to what many believe, 32bit PHP tends to perform better
than 64bit PHP.
So unless there's a really good reason why you
Try with IIS7 + FCGI, it is _fast_ :)
It's a same-across-platforms thing. Mostly to do with the fact we
use mod-rewrite. :(
PHP is so much slower on windows, though a lot of it has to do with
file handling, a Windows specific slowdown I guess.
That's something I really to fix for 5.3.0 or
A word boundary usually matches the natural integer size for the
processor. In the case of a 32 bit processor it would be 32 bits, in the
case of a 64 bit processor it would be 64 bits. This may or may not hold
for windows, but more than likely the word size doubles between the 32
bit
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 23:39 -0700, steve wrote:
A word boundary usually matches the natural integer size for the
processor. In the case of a 32 bit processor it would be 32 bits, in the
case of a 64 bit processor it would be 64 bits. This may or may not hold
for windows, but more than
Yes and No. PHP could be storing bools as a bit packed in a long word.
But your point about compiling is sill more valid. Compiling 32bit
instructions may use instructions that offer off-alignment memory
referencing. That is -- a bool may actual take only a byte in a 32bit
system. That instruction
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 23:59 -0700, steve wrote:
Yes and No. PHP could be storing bools as a bit packed in a long word.
But your point about compiling is sill more valid. Compiling 32bit
instructions may use instructions that offer off-alignment memory
referencing. That is -- a bool may actual
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:36 AM, steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try with IIS7 + FCGI, it is _fast_ :)
It's a same-across-platforms thing. Mostly to do with the fact we
use mod-rewrite. :(
I did not try it yet but IIS has a rewrite module. There is also a
commercial product being 100%
hi,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, contrary to what many believe, 32bit PHP tends to perform better
than 64bit PHP.
So unless there's a really good reason why you want 64bit I wouldn't
waste too much time on that.
And do not forget that the x64
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 23:36 -0700, steve wrote:
It is pretty much include() and its relatives. Autoloading with a lot
of possible include paths. I'm sure if you had a Zend Framework App
and put it on Windows, and took out all the require_onces with paths
in them
Try 5.3 please, our
alexander lind wrote:
Hi All
I just tested my PHP app on Ubuntu 64bit, and found that all my php
scripts would consume about 5x more RAM memory there, compared to how
much they use on my macbook pro (which to make things a bit more
confusing also runs a 64bit OS).
A page that would take up
On Sep 3, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
alexander lind wrote:
Hi All
I just tested my PHP app on Ubuntu 64bit, and found that all my php
scripts would consume about 5x more RAM memory there, compared to
how much they use on my macbook pro (which to make things a bit
more
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 16:32 +0200, Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
I don't get it that people still think 64-bit is twice the 'size' of
32-bit. It's like saying 2 square meters is 2 times a square meter,
while actually it is 4 times a square meter.
Actually... 2 square meters
At 16:57 03/09/2008, you wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 16:32 +0200, Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
I don't get it that people still think 64-bit is twice the 'size'
of 32-bit. It's like saying 2 square meters is 2 times a square
meter, while actually it is 4 times a square
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 16:57 03/09/2008, you wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 16:32 +0200, Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
I don't get it that people still think 64-bit is twice the 'size' of
32-bit. It's like saying 2 square meters
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 16:57 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 16:32 +0200, Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
I don't get it that people still think 64-bit is twice the 'size' of
32-bit. It's like saying 2 square meters is 2 times a square meter,
while
Robert Cummings wrote:
I do develop in C so I now need to take a stick to you. It's still
double space. Use a simple example for yourself. Let's say a struct like
following:
struct _foo
{
int i;
int j;
int k[5];
} foo;
In 32 bit system we have:
32 bits for i
+ 32 bits for j
Colin Guthrie wrote:
Therefore, depending on your structures and how much use of pointers you
use, the size will always be more, but should always be *less* than half.
Erm, that should read *less* than double.
If you only ever user your stack to store pointers to malloc'ed memory
the size
On Sep 3, 2008, at 11:21 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Colin Guthrie wrote:
Therefore, depending on your structures and how much use of
pointers you use, the size will always be more, but should always
be *less* than half.
Erm, that should read *less* than double.
If you only ever user your
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 19:13 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
I do develop in C so I now need to take a stick to you. It's still
double space. Use a simple example for yourself. Let's say a struct like
following:
struct _foo
{
int i;
int j;
int
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 11:51 -0700, alexander lind wrote:
On Sep 3, 2008, at 11:21 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Colin Guthrie wrote:
Therefore, depending on your structures and how much use of
pointers you use, the size will always be more, but should always
be *less* than half.
Erm,
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 11:55 -0700, alexander lind wrote:
For anyone that might be following this thread because they also have
a memory problem (on a 64 bit platform or not), here is some advice on
how to alleviate it:
- Use a bytecode cacher like xcache. Brought my
On Sep 3, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 11:55 -0700, alexander lind wrote:
For anyone that might be following this thread because they also
have a memory problem (on a 64 bit platform or not), here is some
advice on how to alleviate
hi!
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:56 AM, steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's great! I like all the different builds. Two things that pop
out: 1) What are some recommended non-official builds of Apache2 in
x64?
None yet, I still have to create some. Apache may provide some when
they have began
Uh... what about boolean? Depending on the compiler and instruction
set differences, even one-byte things now have to be on longword
boundaries, meaning that something that is one byte will have to take
8 in order to be on proper boundaries. Unless the app or compiler is
doing packing, which I
None yet, I still have to create some. Apache may provide some when
they have began the move to VC9. VC9 Apache builds can be fetched from
http://apachelounge.com, they are known to work very well.
Hmm.. that is a good link. I had forgotten about them. Ideally, I'd
like to get a all 64bit
hi Steve,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:26 AM, steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None yet, I still have to create some. Apache may provide some when
they have began the move to VC9. VC9 Apache builds can be fetched from
http://apachelounge.com, they are known to work very well.
Hmm.. that is a good
Colin Guthrie schreef:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 11:55 -0700, alexander lind wrote:
For anyone that might be following this thread because they also
have a memory problem (on a 64 bit platform or not), here is some
advice on how to alleviate it:
- Use a bytecode cacher
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 16:13 -0700, steve wrote:
Uh... what about boolean? Depending on the compiler and instruction
set differences, even one-byte things now have to be on longword
boundaries, meaning that something that is one byte will have to take
8 in order to be on proper boundaries.
Btw, contrary to what many believe, 32bit PHP tends to perform better
than 64bit PHP.
So unless there's a really good reason why you want 64bit I wouldn't
waste too much time on that.
Andi
-Original Message-
From: steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008
On 03.09.2008, at 00:27, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hello!
Johannes has packed PHP 5.3.0alpha2 yesterday, which you can find
here:
http://downloads.php.net/johannes/
Windows binaries (optimized for various versions of Windows) are
available from the new website dedicated to PHP's windows
Jochem Maas wrote:
redirecting to generals mailing list ...
Diogo Neves schreef:
php -r 'class B { private static function a() {} public function
__callStatic($method, $parms) { echo $method, \n; } } $a = new B;
$a::a();'
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM in
redirecting to generals mailing list ...
Diogo Neves schreef:
php -r 'class B { private static function a() {} public function
__callStatic($method, $parms) { echo $method, \n; } } $a = new B;
$a::a();'
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM in Command line
code on line 1
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
redirecting to generals mailing list ...
Diogo Neves schreef:
php -r 'class B { private static function a() {} public function
__callStatic($method, $parms) { echo $method, \n; } } $a = new B;
$a::a();'
Parse error:
It flance wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using Fedora 8. I installed php, mysql and apache. Now i can run a
script connecting to a database from terminal but not from browser.
Any suggestion?
Have you configured apache to process php scripts?
See item 14 at
in the browser but they are
procesed if run from terminal. So i guess this is a configuration
problem but i have no idea how to fix it.
Thanks
--- On Sat, 8/30/08, David Robley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Robley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: Php installation
To: php-general
Sascha Braun schrieb:
Hi people,
I have a webproject which is round about 3 GB in size. I was usually
using eclipse to work with the software but over time eclipse became
very instable regarding that project.
As soon as I open classes with 2000 or more lines of code in it, an out
of memory
Whats wrong with
echo ?php echo Hello World; ? index.php
is there anything to satisfy your needs...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Aug 27, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Jason Pruim wrote:
Hi Everyone,
So I'm working on a project (Same one I sent the question about
regarding the user access rights on monday) And now I am attempting
to update the record... Here is some of my code:
index.php
?PHP
form method=post
Sancar Saran a écrit :
Whats wrong with
echo ?php echo Hello World; ? index.php
Two syntacticals errors ? :p
is there anything to satisfy your needs...
I prefer cat for that purpose, more flexible.
--
Mickaël Wolff aka Lupus Michaelis
http://lupusmic.org
--
PHP General Mailing
Hi,
I use gPHPEdit and bluefish, it makes PHP easy.
--
Swapnil Jain
--
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTalk : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype : sj1410
YIM : sj1410
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
It flance wrote:
Hi,
What do you think is the best php editor for linux.
I'm using
Check the result at http://phparch.cn.
And you are encouraged to make your choice.
2008/8/19 Pavel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use Zend Studio (shareware, but i couldn't find better things). There are
some plugins for Eclipse,but if you used Zend before, you will be cunfused
by
that plugins...
701 - 800 of 4581 matches
Mail list logo
