Hi,
On a busy site (where the milliseconds start to matter) the chances
are that the operating system has your include files cached so the
load time is probably not a factor. If you install some of the php
token caching systems (zend and others) the speed is even better.
Gentlemen I do believe
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 05:11, Raditha Dissanayake wrote:
As to using header and footer includes I found that system really
frustrating trying to follow the html. What I have switched to is
templates where the site layout is a template and each php page
generates the content and passes it
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 05:11, Raditha Dissanayake wrote:
As to using header and footer includes I found that system really
frustrating trying to follow the html. What I have switched to is
templates where the site layout is a template and each php page
generates the
If you are that concerned about it, pear install apc. Your include
files will be cached in memory and the only cost per include file is a
single stat() system call and looking up the opcode cache in shared
memory.
-Rasmus
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
Rob Paxon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, March 15, 2004 9:24 PM said:
Bear with me while I dish out some details. My question concerns the
efficiency of using multiple file includes versus storing segments of
data in one include as arrays or functions.
have you considered the size
Rob Paxon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, March 15, 2004 9:24 PM said:
Bear with me while I dish out some details. My question concerns the
efficiency of using multiple file includes versus storing segments of
data in one include as arrays or functions.
have you considered the size
Jason Sheets wrote:
Sometimes having less included files with more content is more efficient
than having a lot of small files [...]
I'd think in my case, this is true. Generally, nothing is in these main
include files that aren't needed by every page.
I'd suggest profiling your code, use the
It is my understanding, as disk reads are so slow, that it is not a
good idea to include multiple files. I always knew this, but I never
really thought about it.
Rob, you will find people who religiously avoid includes have pages that
include dozens and dozens of images there by negating the
Thanks for the reply. In my case there aren't many external files
associated with the script. 1 css file per site and no images except on
a few very specific pages.
Adding images does not negate the shaved microseconds. I see what you
mean, but it doesn't literally negate the saved load.
I have used templating for specific projects in the past (and never
really liked it), but for this group of sites I handle both ends, so it
loses a lot of its worth. The factor of a caching system like Zend is
something I have overlooked. Currently, I wouldn't assume my virtual
host uses it,
10 matches
Mail list logo
