Hi Bjori,
> The directory structure is compatible with the intheworks namespace naming
> convention cs, right?
> (Meaning if we move to namespaces no change is needed)
No. The new namespace convention would mean that - if we chose phd as namespace
(note, lowercase!), the directory wouldn't be Ph
The directory structure is compatible with the intheworks namespace naming
convention cs, right?
(Meaning if we move to namespaces no change is needed)
Shame we loose the history... but this needs to be done
-Hannes
On Jun 15, 2009 7:22 p.m., "Christian Weiske" wrote:
Hi all, especially bjori,
Hi all, especially bjori,
My proposed renamings for the classes are:
> http://tmp.cweiske.de/phd-moveclasses
Any objections?
#!/bin/sh
#copy phd classes around
#make sure you are in phd/
mkdir PhD
mkdir PhD/Format
mkdir PhD/Format/Abstract
mkdir PhD/Reader
mkdir PhD/Theme
mkdir PhD/Theme/PEAR
Hi Christian
2009/6/15 Christian Weiske
>
> Do I assume correctly that files like
> include/PhDEnterpriseReader.class.php are meant to replace
> include/PhDReader.class.php?
>
>
The classes PhDReader and PhDFormat still there just for compatibility with
the themes, and now are deprecated. I don'
On Jun 15, 2009, at 1:18 AM, G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote:
Hi,
I'm not a big contributor (in fact, haven't done much more than test
PhD and send some feedback) but I do work with the raw documentation
quite a bit.
I've found some apparent irregularities in how classes are
documented. For
Hello Moacir,
Do I assume correctly that files like
include/PhDEnterpriseReader.class.php are meant to replace
include/PhDReader.class.php?
--
Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Christian Weiske
-= Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I'm not a big contributor (in fact, haven't done much more than test
PhD and send some feedback) but I do work with the raw documentation
quite a bit.
I've found some apparent irregularities in how classes are documented.
For example, the tidy.html has both procedural and OO versions
