On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 15:57, Peter Beverloo wrote:
>
> "Hannes Magnusson" wrote in message
> news:7f3ed2c30907041706k70395232nbe677b06588a0...@mail.gmail.com...
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> The PHP documentation used to be known to be fckingeyh kickass awesome
>> documentations, but since PHP 5 we have bee
On Jul 5, 2009, at 2:53 PM, G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote:
On Jul 5, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Peter Beverloo wrote:
With the documentation moving to PO files soon (as well as changes
around the PhD editor GSoC project)
I follow this list pretty closely but I must have missed this
(rather importan
On Jul 5, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Peter Beverloo wrote:
With the documentation moving to PO files soon (as well as changes
around the PhD editor GSoC project)
I follow this list pretty closely but I must have missed this (rather
important) news item. When will the documentation move to PO files?
Hi Eddie:
> 3) "Why use Reflection?" - an analysis of realistic cases where
> Reflection is useful, perhaps linking ot external resources for
> further research (wikipedia, probably)
>
> And basically, I've not seen (not that it doesn't exist), an example
> of #3 in use in the PHP manual any wher
"Hannes Magnusson" wrote in message
news:7f3ed2c30907041706k70395232nbe677b06588a0...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi all
The PHP documentation used to be known to be fckingeyh kickass awesome
documentations, but since PHP 5 we have been struggling with keeping
up with all the new features and extension
Following are the top 20 pages of the manual, sorted by the number
of user notes contributed. These sections could use a polish, those
notes represent 6.5% of the 21855 total user notes.
Notes | Page
---+-
82 | http://php.net/manual
On Jul 5, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Peter Cowburn wrote:
For what it's worth, I'd rather see "kick-ass awesome" in there than
it being left out. :)
I agree!
Ted S-R
http://tedmasterweb.com
> 2009/7/5 Daniel Brown :
> Still, there are a couple of minor changes
> and some typofixes herein.
I also made a few, very minor changes in an effort to make sentences
flow a little better (for me at least) and to fix an existing typo
("explaination").
> My only real question is if we want to
>
