> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Olson [mailto:phi...@roshambo.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 5:58 PM
> To: Jonathan Guerin
> Cc: phpdoc@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] Problems creating documentation
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Jonathan Guerin wrote:
>
> > Hi eve
Submitting PHP Docs translations to brazilian portuguease.
On 10 June 2011 13:47, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> LOL. Took me a while to notice it was a forward. Looked like you were
> a first class schizophrenic
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:11, Richard Quadling wrote:
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Yannick Torrès
>> Date: 10 June 2011
LOL. Took me a while to notice it was a forward. Looked like you were
a first class schizophrenic
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:11, Richard Quadling wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Yannick Torrès
> Date: 10 June 2011 13:08
> Subject: Re: [DOC-CVS] svn: /phpdoc/en/trunk/refe
-- Forwarded message --
From: Yannick Torrès
Date: 10 June 2011 13:08
Subject: Re: [DOC-CVS] svn: /phpdoc/en/trunk/reference/sca/ examples.xml
To: rquadl...@gmail.com
Cc: doc-...@lists.php.net
Hi Richard,
2011/6/10 Richard Quadling
>
> On 10 June 2011 10:01, Yannick Torres wro
On 06/10/2011 03:46 AM, Ford, Mike wrote:
> What do you think?
I think changing this is an uphill battle. While not completely accurate
as you say, people are rather used to ?: being known as *the* ternary
operator. If you look up ?: on Wikipedia it is the first name you see. A
while it says it i
"Ford, Mike" writes:
> It is. It always has been. That must be Outlook interfering again...! :(
> This message is definitely leaving with the right sig delimiter as
> I've just checked it.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Mike
Worked that time! Possibly a gmane glitch.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Riley [mailto:rile...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 10 June 2011 09:59
>
> "Ford, Mike" writes:
>
> > Having started my documentation career by doing some work on the
> main
> > Operators page,
> > I’d like to introduce a subject that has long bugged me: th
"Ford, Mike" writes:
> Having started my documentation career by doing some work on the main
> Operators page,
> I’d like to introduce a subject that has long bugged me: the term
> “the ternary operator” to
> describe ? :
>
> Whilst it’s strictly true that, as far as PHP is concerned , ? : is *
Having started my documentation career by doing some work on the main Operators
page,
I'd like to introduce a subject that has long bugged me: the term "the ternary
operator" to
describe ? :
Whilst it's strictly true that, as far as PHP is concerned , ? : is *the*
ternary operator, that's
not r
10 matches
Mail list logo
