Hi Hannes,
On 01.03.2012 12:34, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I've done all the changes to PhD packages I intended, documentation
generated by PhD_PEAR is quite a bit less broken now and almost valid
HTML5.
Please review the changes and let me know if I did break something after
all. If I didn't, plea
Hi Hannes,
On 09.02.2012 15:49, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I've done all the changes to PhD packages I intended, documentation
generated by PhD_PEAR is quite a bit less broken now and almost valid HTML5.
Please review the changes and let me know if I did break something after
all. If I didn't, plea
Hi Hannes,
On 09.02.2012 15:49, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I've done all the changes to PhD packages I intended, documentation
generated by PhD_PEAR is quite a bit less broken now and almost valid HTML5.
Please review the changes and let me know if I did break something after
all. If I didn't, plea
Hi,
I've done all the changes to PhD packages I intended, documentation generated by
PhD_PEAR is quite a bit less broken now and almost valid HTML5. Please review
the changes and let me know if I did break something after all. If I didn't,
please do the releases.
As promised, here is a patc
Hi Hannes,
On 05.02.2012 14:09, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I'm currently trying to make HTML generated by PhD_PEAR conform to HTML5
spec and fix a few more annoying problems with it.
Most of the HTML-generating code, however, lives in PhD or Phd_Generic
packages. Of course I can override that code
Hi,
I'm currently trying to make HTML generated by PhD_PEAR conform to HTML5 spec
and fix a few more annoying problems with it.
Most of the HTML-generating code, however, lives in PhD or Phd_Generic packages.
Of course I can override that code in PhD_PEAR, but a cleaner solution will be
to c
