to keep the ball rolling on this, so please let me know if
you have any comments or questions. A copy of my email from the 26th
including the information from the lawyers is quoted below.
Thanks,
-- Robinson
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Robinson Tryon
bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Philip Olson phi...@roshambo.org wrote:
I avoid the topic of licenses whenever possible but let's make a decision.
It feels like most would prefer dual licensing for code snippets
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Christopher Jones
christopher.jo...@oracle.com wrote:
I wwould NOT like to see dual licensing. Aside from any likely
legal issues
I think we're all interested in any potential legal issues that
licensing changes could bring. What additional legal issues would
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Philip Olson phi...@roshambo.org wrote:
I avoid the topic of licenses whenever possible but let's make a decision. It
feels like most would prefer dual licensing for code snippets (despite GPL
and PHP not getting along all that well, ever) so let's do that.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, when adding a use contributor note the note becomes
'property of the PHP Documentation Group'
See http://no.php.net/manual/add-note.php
This means that any note submitted here becomes the property of
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Brandon Savage
bran...@brandonsavage.net wrote:
The CC-BY license states [...some things...]
...
This is the provision from which I derived that fair use avoids infringement
even if credit is not given.
(IANAL) but it's entirely possible that a Fair Use
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote:
I'm of the opinion that we should license all
machine-interpretable examples (i.e. - code snippets) in both the
official documentation usage examples and user-submitted examples
alike - including those from the mailing
