Re: [PHP-DOC] Documenting a pecl extension, but...

2005-12-02 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
Michael Wallner wrote: > Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > >>> The extension name is actually http, the package has just been >>> named pecl_http because there already was a HTTP package in PEAR. >> >> Ok, since there is no actual http extension in PHP, and we use the "http >> extension" designation just to g

Re: [PHP-DOC] Documenting a pecl extension, but...

2005-12-02 Thread Michael Wallner
Gabor Hojtsy wrote: The extension name is actually http, the package has just been named pecl_http because there already was a HTTP package in PEAR. Ok, since there is no actual http extension in PHP, and we use the "http extension" designation just to group some http related functions, what i

Re: [PHP-DOC] Documenting a pecl extension, but...

2005-12-02 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
Friedhelm Betz wrote: > Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > >> Ok, since there is no actual http extension in PHP, and we use the "http >> extension" designation just to group some http related functions, what >> if we move these to the network functions (and pray that a network >> extension will not come aroun

Re: [PHP-DOC] Documenting a pecl extension, but...

2005-12-02 Thread Friedhelm Betz
Gabor Hojtsy wrote: hui, I think name it like your package name: pecl_http. But, thats ugly ;-) Yeah, *ugly* The extension name is actually http, the package has just been named pecl_http because there already was a HTTP package in PEAR. Ok, since there is no actual http extension in PHP, a

Re: [PHP-DOC] Documenting a pecl extension, but...

2005-12-02 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
>> hui, I think name it like your package name: pecl_http. >> But, thats ugly ;-) > > Yeah, *ugly* > > The extension name is actually http, the package has just been > named pecl_http because there already was a HTTP package in PEAR. Ok, since there is no actual http extension in PHP, and we use

Re: [PHP-DOC] Documenting a pecl extension, but...

2005-12-02 Thread Michael Wallner
Friedhelm Betz wrote: hui, I think name it like your package name: pecl_http. But, thats ugly ;-) Yeah, *ugly* The extension name is actually http, the package has just been named pecl_http because there already was a HTTP package in PEAR. Hint: to start documenting your extension you might

Re: [PHP-DOC] Documenting a pecl extension, but...

2005-12-02 Thread Friedhelm Betz
Hi Michael, Hi, if I ever come around to properly document my pecl extension, I wonder how I would need to proceed as there already is reference/http/reference.xml? I'd appreciate any hints and suggestions! hui, I think name it like your package name: pecl_http. But, thats ugly ;-) Anyway,

[PHP-DOC] Documenting a pecl extension, but...

2005-12-02 Thread Michael Wallner
Hi, if I ever come around to properly document my pecl extension, I wonder how I would need to proceed as there already is reference/http/reference.xml? I'd appreciate any hints and suggestions! Thanks, -- Michael - http://dev.iworks.at/ext-http/http-functions.html.gz