-Original Message-
From: Philip Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 3:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: PHPdoc List; Hannes Magnusson
Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] EN-Revision comments Vs Docbook
revision attributes
Personally I'm unable to throw my vote
Personally I'm unable to throw my vote towards any particular method
at this time but feel we're getting somewhere and that this topic
won't be forgotten. Ideally even more people will weigh in with
ideas, especially translators, for how best to approach this. There
are several good
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
The rules would be the same as CVS Revision, just manually bumped.
What about taking similar concept as with PHP source? I.e. marking
whether the change is translatable or otherwise in the commit message.
Then we can bind some scripts (e.g. scripts/diff_en_rev.php) to
Hannes Magnusson написа:
On 8/30/07, Philip Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 18, 2007, at 8:42 AM, Fernando Correa da Conceição wrote:
Hannes Magnusson escreveu:
Hello all
Was there any specific reason why this EN-Revision comment magic
was
chosen over the Docbook revision attribute?
Nuno Lopes написа:
I don't like this idea because the revision doesn't get bumped
automatically. I think there'll be more problems that the little efforth
of the translators to bump a no-op revision.
Please remember that not everybody that contributes documentation
belongs to the phpdoc team
On 8/30/07, Philip Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 18, 2007, at 8:42 AM, Fernando Correa da Conceição wrote:
Hannes Magnusson escreveu:
Hello all
Was there any specific reason why this EN-Revision comment magic
was
chosen over the Docbook revision attribute?
If there's a
On 10/6/07, Nuno Lopes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hannes Magnusson escreveu:
Hello all
Was there any specific reason why this EN-Revision comment magic
was
chosen over the Docbook revision attribute?
If there's a better way then let's do it... please propose exactly
On 06/10/2007, Hannes Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/6/07, Nuno Lopes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't like this idea because the revision doesn't get bumped
automatically. I think there'll be more problems that the little efforth of
the translators to bump a no-op revision.
Is
On Aug 18, 2007, at 8:42 AM, Fernando Correa da Conceição wrote:
Hannes Magnusson escreveu:
Hello all
Was there any specific reason why this EN-Revision comment magic
was
chosen over the Docbook revision attribute?
If there's a better way then let's do it... please propose exactly
how
Hello all
Was there any specific reason why this EN-Revision comment magic was
chosen over the Docbook revision attribute?
As I see it we could safe our translators _alot_ of work by manually
bumping revision whenever the changes done in the en docs need
re-translation.
This would mean that all
Hannes Magnusson escreveu:
Hello all
Was there any specific reason why this EN-Revision comment magic was
chosen over the Docbook revision attribute?
As I see it we could safe our translators _alot_ of work by manually
bumping revision whenever the changes done in the en docs need
11 matches
Mail list logo
