2009/3/31 Philip Olson :
>
So is there anything I can do?
>
>>> My question is, were those statistics about undocumented functions etc. a
>>> result of problems with PhD or a genuine reflection of functions that are
>>> missing documentation? My guess is the latter...
>
>> How feasible would i
So is there anything I can do?
My question is, were those statistics about undocumented functions
etc. a
result of problems with PhD or a genuine reflection of functions
that are
missing documentation? My guess is the latter...
How feasible would it be to add a "to" attribute to the ver
2009/3/31 G. T. Stresen-Reuter :
> On Mar 31, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
>>
>> So is there anything I can do?
>>
>> -- -
>> Richard Quadling
>
> My question is, were those statistics about undocumented functions etc. a
> result of problems with PhD or a genuine reflection of fun
On Mar 31, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
So is there anything I can do?
--
-
Richard Quadling
My question is, were those statistics about undocumented functions
etc. a result of problems with PhD or a genuine reflection of
functions that are missing documentation? My gu
2009/3/26 Philip Olson :
> Greetings,
>
> I'm not really offering a solution here but will point out some problems and
> considerations after looking at:
>
> - A diff of the generated funcindex.xml versus the current in CVS
> - The function index to see which are considered undocumented in the ne
Greetings,
I'm not really offering a solution here but will point out some
problems and considerations after looking at:
- A diff of the generated funcindex.xml versus the current in CVS
- The function index to see which are considered undocumented in
the new funcindex
- How phd mani
2009/3/26 Hannes Magnusson :
> 13:21 Hannes: dont know what you mean
> you mean it still doesn't work?
> me: No. Me stupid.
> Hannes: ok. good
> me: Built from version xml files.
>
> I have 695 undocumented functions and 942 undocumented methods.
> 13:22 Seems version.xml contains more than is
