On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 03:46, Damien Seguy wrote:
>
> Le Lundi 18 février 2002, à 05:59 , Lars Torben Wilson a écrit :
>
> > OK, here's my current proposal. I'm not married to it so if you're
> > against it please explain.
> >
> > Currently we have predefined variables and constants listed in the
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 03:40, Georg Richter wrote:
> On Monday, 18. February 2002 23:59, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
>
> >Appendix : List of reserved words
> > - Language keywords
> > - Predefined variables
> > - Predefined constants
> > - Predefined classes
>
> an Appendix
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:40:18 +0100
Georg Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> an Appendix would be nice, but the constants should be listed in the
function
> reference too.
why, is a pointer not enough?
Jan
--
Q: Thank Jan? A: http://geschenke.an.dasmoped.net/
On Monday, 18. February 2002 23:59, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
>Appendix : List of reserved words
> - Language keywords
> - Predefined variables
> - Predefined constants
> - Predefined classes
an Appendix would be nice, but the constants should be listed in the function
r
> Personally, I would like to get all reserved words into one appendix:
> 'List of Reserved words'. Structure would be something like:
>
>Appendix : List of reserved words
> - Language keywords
> - Predefined variables
> - Predefined constants
> - Predefined classes
>
> .
OK, here's my current proposal. I'm not married to it so if you're
against it please explain.
Currently we have predefined variables and constants listed in the
Variables and Constants sections of the manual, respectively. It has
been (more or less) agreed that these should be moved to an append
