On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> OK, so the only thing it seems need to be done by systems@ is to move
> the chapters/security.xml to security/security.xml or security/index.xml
> or something, to preserve CVS history. Then the other changes can be
> done in phpdoc CVS.
I'll do that
If nobody vote against, somebody (goba, derick,..., me?) should ask
@systems for the move of the file(s) and the user notes.
I'm systems@ too :) I can have a look at it this weekend.
Hoho, so in the future we just ask you ;-)
It would be nice to know, what will be the new ID names for the security
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> >If nobody vote against, somebody (goba, derick,..., me?) should ask
> >@systems for the move of the file(s) and the user notes.
>
> I'm systems@ too :) I can have a look at it this weekend.
> >>>
> >>>Hoho, so in the future we just ask y
If nobody vote against, somebody (goba, derick,..., me?) should ask
@systems for the move of the file(s) and the user notes.
I'm systems@ too :) I can have a look at it this weekend.
Hoho, so in the future we just ask you ;-)
It would be nice to know, what will be the new ID names for the security
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> >>>If nobody vote against, somebody (goba, derick,..., me?) should ask
> >>>@systems for the move of the file(s) and the user notes.
> >>
> >>I'm systems@ too :) I can have a look at it this weekend.
> >
> > Hoho, so in the future we just ask you ;-)
>
If nobody vote against, somebody (goba, derick,..., me?) should ask
@systems for the move of the file(s) and the user notes.
I'm systems@ too :) I can have a look at it this weekend.
Hoho, so in the future we just ask you ;-)
It would be nice to know, what will be the new ID names for the security
On Thursday 19 June 2003 22:19, Derick Rethans wrote:
[...]
> >
> > If nobody vote against, somebody (goba, derick,..., me?) should ask
> > @systems for the move of the file(s) and the user notes.
>
> I'm systems@ too :) I can have a look at it this weekend.
Hoho, so in the future we just ask you
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
> So the agreement seems to be to move security.xml from chapters to a new
> subdirectory security. As main 'part' under 'book' it will be on the same
> level as "Features".
>
> If nobody vote against, somebody (goba, derick,..., me?) should ask @sy
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:50, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
[...]
> >>
> >>I think it should belong outside "Getting Started", but it should also
> >>be more visible than an appendix. Why not add it as a 'part' under the
> >>main 'book' so that it is on the same level as "Features"?
> >
> > Fine for me. Wh
any concerns about moving security.xml to appendices?
The complete install.* files will probably move to their own install
chapter and security.xml will be a bit lost in "Getting started" (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=phpdoc&m=105431419829611&w=2)
therefore appendices seems to be a proper pl
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 11:03, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
> > any concerns about moving security.xml to appendices?
> > The complete install.* files will probably move to their own install
> > chapter and security.xml will be a bit lost in "Getting started" (
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 02:03, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
>
> > any concerns about moving security.xml to appendices?
> > The complete install.* files will probably move to their own install chapter
> > and security.xml will be a bit lost in "Getting started"
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
> any concerns about moving security.xml to appendices?
> The complete install.* files will probably move to their own install chapter
> and security.xml will be a bit lost in "Getting started" (see
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=phpdoc&m=10543141982
Hi,
any concerns about moving security.xml to appendices?
The complete install.* files will probably move to their own install chapter
and security.xml will be a bit lost in "Getting started" (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=phpdoc&m=105431419829611&w=2)
therefore appendices seems to be a pro
14 matches
Mail list logo
