Hi,
> Any of these recently become available? If so, typically
> we add 's to reflect when they did became available
> in PHP.
Yeah, uhm, yesterday :-)
So they're in CVS only.
Where do I put these notes?
> Btw, no build errors over here! :)
I tried to be careful with the copy&paste :)
Cheer
> > Any of these recently become available? If so, typically
> > we add 's to reflect when they did became available
> > in PHP.
>
> Yeah, uhm, yesterday :-)
> So they're in CVS only.
>
> Where do I put these notes?
Exactly where the new feature is explained.
Goba
--
PHP Documentation Maili
mboeren Tue Oct 29 03:41:03 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/dbxini.xml reference.xml
/phpdoc/en/reference/dbx/functions dbx-query.xml
Log:
Added notes about availability of newly added features.
Index: phpdoc/en/reference/dbx/ini.xml
d
Hi,
> > Where do I put these notes?
> Exactly where the new feature is explained.
I meant where I could put the tags, but I've made the changes already
now.
Cheerio, Marc.
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> &reference.dbx.ini;
> +
> +
> + The DBX_OCI8,
> + BX_COLNAMES_UNCHANGED,
> + DBX_COLNAMES_UPPERCASE and
> + DBX_COLNAMES_LOWERCASE constants are in CVS
only.
> +
> +
Seems like a D is missing from the second constant's name...
Goba
--
PHP Documentation Maili
mboeren Tue Oct 29 04:12:15 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/dbxreference.xml
Log:
Typo corrected.
Index: phpdoc/en/reference/dbx/reference.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/reference/dbx/reference.xml:1.7
phpdoc/en/reference/dbx/reference.xml:1.8
--- p
> Seems like a D is missing from the second constant's name...
Thanks for being alert!
Cheerio, Marc.
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 08:28 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> The howto needs work too :)
> The download links don't seem to work and some of the SRMPS (which don't
apply
> to my system by the way) are no longer available at sources.redhat.com.
Doh.
> Secondly - it's not very clear if I need those 5 OR jade, or a
mboeren Tue Oct 29 05:42:23 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/dbxconstants.xml reference.xml
Log:
Moved notes about availability
Index: phpdoc/en/reference/dbx/constants.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/reference/dbx/constants.xml:1.3
phpdoc/en/referenc
Hello,
Please find it as attachment the xml file for the new image/imagerotate
function.
As Dams just told me, I post this file here.
Thank's in advance,
pa
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
txt attachment :)
imagerotate
Rotate an image using a given angle
Description
ressourceimagecopy
resourcesrc_im
floatangle
intbgd_color
Rotate the images src_im using a given angle
angle in degree.
The color for uncovered zone us
>> The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
>> they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
>> succeed. Is it really necessary to document that apache 2.03x works
>> only with php 4.2.x1, php4.2.x2 and apache 2.04x only with php4.2y1
>> or php4.2.y2
At 08:43 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
> they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
> succeed. Is it really necessary to document that apache 2.03x works
> only with php 4.2.x1, php4.2.x2 and apache 2.
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> At 08:43 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>
> >
> >I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the documentation
> >about Apache 2 support.
> >
> > 1. It's not production ready
>
> Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to "the best
Hallo Melvyn,
Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 9:55:31 AM, you wrote:
> At 08:43 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>> > The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
>> > they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
>> > succeed. Is it really necessary to doc
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
> Some functions use internal function php_addslashes() when
> magic_quotes_runtime=1. But some tests need this to be
> magic_quotes_runtime=0.
Ah, makes sense... maybe we can use this information to compile a list
for documenting which function relies o
I fixed these internal functions not only once so for me this was a clear
scenario. But your idea sounds good. What about moving
magic_quotes_runtime=0 to run-tests.php. Then we can easily change it
to 1 and see which tests fail. But this is only one ini setting...
At 14:01 29.10.2002, Derick Reth
At 14:01 10/29/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
> Some functions use internal function php_addslashes() when
> magic_quotes_runtime=1. But some tests need this to be
> magic_quotes_runtime=0.
Ah, makes sense... maybe we can use this information to comp
Do not make a mistake here. magic_quotes_runtime is
used for the file functions used in the tests. Should have
mention this before i guess.
marcus
At 14:26 29.10.2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
At 14:01 10/29/2002 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
> Some funct
mboeren Tue Oct 29 09:28:36 2002 EDT
Added files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/dbx/functions dbx-escape-string.xml
Log:
Added documentation for new dbx_escape_string function.
Index: phpdoc/en/reference/dbx/functions/dbx-escape-string.xml
+++ phpdoc/en/reference
> >What 5 ? All tools are needed including jade. XSLT rendering is dealt
> >with in a different part, and it's mentioned that it's currently
> >not used in production at phpdoc.
>
> howto/tools.xml:
> You will need to download the following files:
> docbook-4.x.src.rpm
> jade-1.2.
gobaTue Oct 29 11:17:08 2002 EDT
Added files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/image/functionsimagerotate.xml
Log:
Adding the documentation for the new function sent in
by Pierre-Alain Joye, with some syntactic and semantic
corrections.
Index: phpdoc/
> Please find it as attachment the xml file for the new image/imagerotate
> function.
>
> As Dams just told me, I post this file here.
Added.
Goba
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:20:08 +0100
Gabor Hojtsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please find it as attachment the xml file for the new
> > image/imagerotate function.
> >
> > As Dams just told me, I post this file here.
>
> Added.
thanks
pa
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net
At 17:11 10/29/2002 +0100, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> > > As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP
> > documentation
> > > that Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not
> > production ready
> > > for Apache 2.
> >
> > But it's incorrect :). By saying "Do not use Apache 2 and PHP
We add the version notes in places except function
definitions as that info is automatically created
for every function, above the proto.
And, instead of CVS you may want to write what
version of PHP, such as 4.3.0, unless of course
you don't know yet :) Typically one of the lead
php-dev people
At 11:30 10/29/2002 +0100, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
>>I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the
documentation
>>about Apache 2 support.
>>
>> 1. It's not production ready
> Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to "the best version yet"
marketing
> trick the Apache Grou
> > 1. It's not production ready
>
> Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to "the best version yet"
marketing
> trick the Apache Group is advertising on their front page.
> We can mention it to users, in the bug db etc. But officially documenting,
that
> Apache 2 is really a beta product, do
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP documentation that
> Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not production ready for
> Apache 2.
But it's incorrect :). By saying "Do not use Apache 2 and PHP in a
production environment" you
Derick Rethans writes:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>
> > As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP
> documentation
> > that Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not
> production ready
> > for Apache 2.
>
> But it's incorrect :). By saying "Do not use Apac
> > > As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP
> > documentation
> > > that Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not
> > production ready
> > > for Apache 2.
> >
> > But it's incorrect :). By saying "Do not use Apache 2 and PHP in a
> > production environment" you don't
> > >>I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the
> > documentation
> > >>about Apache 2 support.
> > >>
> > >> 1. It's not production ready
> >
> > > Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to "the best version yet"
> > marketing
> > > trick the Apache Group is advertising
I did more work and testing with fastcgi and apache 2, and have php 4.3
running under apache 2. Since it's out of process, no multithread
issues which are one of the major issues. I didn't write docs, but
there are some in sapi/cgi/README.fastcgi
Shane
As far as I can see, we should not not
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: win2000 pro,win xp pro
PHP version: 4.2.3
PHP Bug Type: Documentation problem
Bug description: php_manual_zh_cn.chm
in the left of index page, the chinese words can not display well
--
Edit bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=20
A quotation from this page reads as follows:
"setcookie() defines a cookie to be sent along with the rest of the
header information. Cookies must be sent before any other headers are
sent (this is a restriction of cookies, not PHP)."
This is inaccurate. It is not necessary that cookies be sent
Ok, you have phpdoc karma now.
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Chris Shiflett wrote:
> A quotation from this page reads as follows:
>
> "setcookie() defines a cookie to be sent along with the rest of the
> header information. Cookies must be sent before any other headers are
> sent (this is a restriction of
ID: 20160
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Status: Open
+Status: Suspended
Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: win2000 pro,win xp pro
PHP Version: 4.2.3
New Comment:
I'm familiar with this,
37 matches
Mail list logo
