sfoxMon Jan 31 07:53:29 2005 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/security errors.xml
Log:
Getting rid of the E_NONE myth, and also incorporating a user note.
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/security/errors.xml?r1=1.6&r2=1.7&ty=u
Index: phpdoc/en/security/er
of the summer due to all the other
things that are more nearly in place and slightly more pressing :-\
The Who's Who is about 7 weeks behind at present, it's normally updated
4-weekly and mid-month. But I think you'd be surprised how much you
actually do - I didn't expect an
sfoxSun Jul 31 15:02:48 2005 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/entitiesglobal.ent
Log:
add bind9 for ldap purposes (win32 binary there)
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/entities/global.ent?r1=1.235&r2=1.236&ty=u
Index: phpdoc/entities/global.ent
diff -u phpd
sfoxSun Jul 31 15:05:13 2005 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/faq obtaining.xml
Log:
updating the ldap stuff
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml?r1=1.20&r2=1.21&ty=u
Index: phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/obtaining.xm
sfoxSun Jul 31 15:06:10 2005 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/ldap reference.xml
Log:
updating the ldap stuff
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/reference/ldap/reference.xml?r1=1.12&r2=1.13&ty=u
Index: phpdoc/en/reference/ldap/reference.xml
diff
ny case, perhaps we can update the
> documentation to at least reflect that the extension really is for
> Verisign?
I think your mailserver's maybe lagging :)
- Steph
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> Is someone here using PHP under MSWindows? I
> personally am lucky and do not need to use that OS at
> work or home.
I'm unlucky and use it, BUT I've already been through this when I was
working on dir functions last year. None of the permissions _can_ work
on doze so it doesn't really need te
emanual, will you please send plain text and not html next time?
You're doing my head in!
- Original Message -
From: "eManual" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gabor Hojtsy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] :: compiling manual
Nope, deprecate is the right one -- it has been used for many years in
many
standards documents (ANSI, ISO, and others). It indicates that a
certain
usage is now disapproved of (see meaning 2 of deprecate, below), not
that
its value has in any way changed.
+1!
- Steph
--
PHP Documentation
'See also' is in the gentext language files, folks. It's supposed to be
an entity.
(and no, we don't use it either .. yet)
- Original Message -
From: "Hartmut Holzgraefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gabor Hojtsy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Philip Olson"
<[
Has anyone tried to build livedocs with recent php5-dev on win32 yet?
I'm having issues with CDATA and need to know it's not just some bad of
mine with php-gtk-doc livedocs before I put in a PHP5 bug report..
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://
of the time.
I think you're doing the right thing asking sane questions about
programming terms. Don't be put off by people who tell you otherwise,
but please do learn a little about programming along the way :) - it's
part of the job to test examples, if nothing else.
- Steph (who
2 'n's in 'planning' ...
- Original Message -
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 9:10 PM
Subject: [PHP-DOC] #25913 [NEW]: Update for global entities and PHP
history (patch included)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
sfoxSun Nov 9 08:25:40 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/language operators.xml
Log:
tidying previous update
Index: phpdoc/en/language/operators.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/language/operators.xml:1.54 phpdoc/en/language/operators.xml:1.55
--- phpdoc/en/language
heh, welcome to the wonderful issues of php-gtk..
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabor Hojtsy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 November 2003 17:29
> To: Georg Richter
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] MySQLI Documentation
>
>
> >>The DOMXML extension has this kind of doc
Perdeep, hi
This list is not here to provide PHP user support.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the correct place for that. Please write to
them/search their archives.
(see http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php)
Thanks
Steph
-Original Message-
From: Perdeep Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
god yes
I don't think there's been one single person over the last two years who
hasn't had this problem when changing isp.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabor Hojtsy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 December 2003 16:53
> To: Sean Coates
> Cc: Prioritus Yotto Putera; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's also considered normal in the UK to leave two spaces after a period.
Why do you consider it a) a typo and b) a problem?
> -Original Message-
> From: Derek Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 December 2003 07:35
> To: [php-doc]
> Subject: [PHP-DOC] Another victim in the hunt for
> doesn't HTML's condensation of whitespace fix this issue, anyway?
>
exactly..
sure, but changing the build system
requirements is a very big move! and one that will lose us the occasional
phpdoc team member who wants to help out on a smaller project for a while.
I agree with Jesus. Leave the changes until PHP5 has production status and
Phing is provably stable. Please :)
- Steph
> There was quite some discussion on creating a central build system for
> the documentation projects, and livedocs will be a move towards this
> direction, since it should be developed with portability in mind
I inherited a lot of non-standard xml, as you know. We also have the
problem that php-
> If you don't have cygwin, how will you checkout the CVS module??
> Maybe we could use the script I made that implements the CVS protocol in
> PHP. :)
>
erm, against everything I said so far - tortoise works and is far less
unwieldy than cygwin .. it just has one or two areas where it's nice to h
Fine, except we don't use jade on php-gtk-doc either. We use xsltproc
because it's w-a-a-a-y faster.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Fabry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 December 2003 11:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP-DOC] Re: dropping the unix tools
>
>
> Would it be p
ng the build system simple and keeping the vairous build systems as
> close as possible.
Amen to that!
I've no objection to working toward this, whatsoever, so long as the
replacement systems are robust. You mentioned earlier in this mail that
livedocs would be moving to cvs.php.net - is there an e.t.a. on that?
>
> Goba
Steph
know what you're saying.
and the ugly HTML
> produced by the DSSSL sheets
no comment ;)
I would like to make livedocs work for the
> PHP sites ASAP (with public beta testing before it could replace the
> current docs :). ASAP means "in the coming months" :))
Wez, do your stuff! ;)
>
> Goba
>
- Steph
> I have already installed livedocs on my computer (windows with cygwin) and
> it works!
> It was a bit painfull, but now I have it working!
>
with phpdoc, yes :)
nce the need to form your own solutions.
Steph
> Or still to change all manual from
> methodsynopsys/methodname/methodparam to
> funcsynopsis/funcparams/parameter... And I'm not crazy ;)
What, no grep? ;)
There's no reason you should change the way you document non-OO functions.
For php-gtk-doc we went the funcsynopsis route; we have funct
nd please remember, we also have signals to contend with, as well as
enumerations and flags.
Steph
>
> --
> Hartmut Holzgraefe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Egon and Zeev are twins?
wild..
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabor Hojtsy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 February 2004 19:09
> To: Cornelia Boenigk
> Cc: PHP DOC
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] birthday class
>
>
> > > class benutzer
> > {
> > var $name;
> > var $gebjahr;
> >
>
If someone will give me the lowdown on the way OO is being treated in phpdoc
I'll spend some time bringing php-gtk-doc into line. So long as it's not
about to all change again.
- Steph
> -Original Message-
> From: Hartmut Holzgraefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
- or take it straight from cvs.php.net -
> -Original Message-
> From: Friedhelm Betz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 June 2004 15:58
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Nuno Lopes; Gabor Hojtsy
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc / manual.xml.in /en/install README
> intro.xml problems.xml
a new list if he feels like it.
+1 from me for a separate list, too.
I have removed jmoore@ from the cross-posting list as he is not currently active in
anything php.net-related (this may change in the future, of course).
- Steph
Ben: you need to apply for it to Goba :) You currently have karma only for
php-gtk-doc; basically once you start rolling with that and people on the
existing teams can see how you get along you can ask for (and expect to get)
karma for other areas of php.net.
Goba: Ben only joined us this week..
> - the current Windows docs suggest users to copy files to the windows
> and system32 folders
>
> - people (Daniel Convissor) report that it is possible to not do
> this, but set PATH to include the PHP folder and the dlls
> folder below the PHP folder (for PHP 4) + set PHPRC
>
>
ps what's PHPRC?
-Original Message-
From: Steph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 June 2004 14:17
To: Gabor Hojtsy; PHPdoc; Wez Furlong; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-DOC] help needed with windows install part of the PHP
manual
> - the current Windows docs suggest users
> This means that if we suggest people to replicate the PHP 5 package
> structure with PHP 4 (move the contents of the dlls folder and the sapi
> folder into the root PHP folder), and place php.ini there, then that
> should work without and special PATH settings either for PHP 4 or PHP 5.
> I wonde
ts.
> >
> > This means that if we suggest people to replicate the PHP 5 package
> > structure with PHP 4 (move the contents of the dlls folder and the sapi
> > folder into the root PHP folder), and place php.ini there, then that
> > should work without and special PATH set
nder PHP 4? Is it a bug or a
feature, and if so which version's correct?
-Original Message-
From: Steph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 June 2004 16:37
To: Nuno Lopes; Gabor Hojtsy
Cc: PHPdoc
Subject: RE: [PHP-DOC] help needed with windows install part of the PHP
manual
following m
Can you tell me exactly what your layout is/was for Apache 1.3.* please? I
never loaded a module into that..
> -Original Message-
> From: Nuno Lopes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 June 2004 18:25
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PHP-DOC
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] help needed with windows inst
ok, so what worked when php4apache2.dll was loaded?
> -Original Message-
> From: Nuno Lopes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 June 2004 18:29
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PHP-DOC
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] help needed with windows install part of the PHP
> manual
>
>
> > Can you tell me exact
> > In apache2\bin: copy of php5ts.dll, copy of php.ini
>
> I don't have any file in the apache dir...
> I've made a test, and if you copy the php.ini file to the apache dir, it
> will parse it, instead of the php.ini file in the windows folder.
I can't reproduce this. I suspect you still have a
You said you didn't used to have this problem with PHP4. That's why I'm
asking, how did you have it set up with PHP4?
> -Original Message-
> From: Nuno Lopes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 June 2004 18:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PHP-DOC
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] help needed with win
Guys,
We seem to have established now that you can't have the one-dir-does-all
setup when running PHP as an Apache2 module.
Is there anywhere else that it wouldn't be appropriate, anyone?
- Steph
DevZone Editor
www.zend.com
This is fine if you only want one PHP setup. Speaking with my PHP-GTK hat
on, it's not that straightforward... most PHP-GTK users will have both a
server-based installation of some kind _and_ a cli-based installation. I
think it's safe to say that a lot of people will want to be running both PHP
> I would not complicate the issue. Our current instructions also
> assume that
> there is only a single php install on the machine and I think we
> should keep
> it that way. The goal should be to get users up and running with
> php quickly.
> They can later go with the advanced stuff like multipl
ide for multiple installations nearby?
I don't understand why you think that information belongs in a FAQ, given
that it's quite a large chunk of info... but hey, it'd better be somewhere
than nowhere at all!
- Steph
Jakub: sadly, that's exactly what the consensus is NOT. That's what I'm
fighting for ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Vrana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 June 2004 10:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] help needed with windows install part of the PHP
> manual
asiest for
beginners.
-Original Message-
From: Steph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 June 2004 10:50
To: Jakub Vrana; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-DOC] help needed with windows install part of the PHP
manual
Jakub: sadly, that's exactly what the consensus is NOT. Tha
Maybe we're approaching this in the wrong way. Maybe we should have one set
of instructions (Jakub's, Frank's and mine) for installing PHP as cgi/cli
and another (Edin's) for installing PHP as an Apache module. The FAQ could
then sensibly contain something about multiple installations when PHP is
> > However, if you want to run PHP as an Apache module rather than
> as cgi, the
> > situation changes. In that case, Edin's solution is by far the
> easiest for
> > beginners.
>
> I know. What I am saying is that no application should be installed like
> that so we should rather try to change t
> Thats not as simple as it sounds. It is possible for php 5,
> because there is
> php.exe for the cli-version and php-cgi.exe for the cgi-version.
> Unfortunately this is not true for php 4 versions, before we can instruct
> people to dump all contents to e.g. c:\php. We have to instruct them, to
gt; -Original Message-
> From: Friedhelm Betz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 June 2004 11:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Edin Kadribasic; Gabor Hojtsy
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] help needed with windows install part of the PHP
> manual
>
>
>
> This is not really correct. First of all my instructions were
> valid for all
> web servers, including Apache, IIS, and even cgi/cli usage.
Yes; but apart from the Apache module case, the 'all in one dir' setup is
also valid for all uses, and far more simple. Is there a good reason why we
shoul
> > Yes; but apart from the Apache module case, the 'all in one
> dir' setup is
> > also valid for all uses, and far more simple. Is there a good
> reason why
> > we should advocate a more complex installation process simply to
> > accommodate PHP run as an Apache module?
>
> Its actually the othe
server's bin
directory/equivalent. Underlying library dlls also need to be visible to
the server.
HTH,
- Steph
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Vrana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 June 2004 07:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: help
erm.. it is?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Vrana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 June 2004 17:16
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: help needed with windows install part of the
> PHPmanual
>
>
> Steph wrote:
> > As I said befo
different php*ts.dll.
The problem with setting a PHP PATH entry is that it excludes the
possibility of other installations.
- Steph
Guys, Jakub - Zeev just changed it all..!
-Original Message-
From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 July 2004 16:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_4_3) /main php_ini.c
zeevThu Jul 1 11:43:40 2004 EDT
Modified files: (
good time to take advice from above..
- Steph
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabor Hojtsy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 July 2004 11:41
> To: PHPdoc; Steph; Nuno Lopes; Jakub Vrana
> Subject: the windows install part story
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> I am just
: Nuno Lopes; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gabor Hojtsy; Jakub Vrana
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] RE: the windows install part story
>
>
> On Wednesday 07 July 2004 19:13, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Steph is right! There is no consensus. I've found a trully
> oficial w
(god I hate Outlook)
-Original Message-
From: Steph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2004 03:18
To: DOC-WEB; DOC-WEB
Cc: Andrei
Subject: FW: [PHP-GTK] what is going on with gtk.php.net?
It occurs to me that this should've had a wider audience (Andrei, Goba,
phpdoc and docwe
Guy, all,
I hope nobody minds if I forward this to the phpdoc list where this will be
fully appreciated ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Guy N. Hurst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 July 2004 03:46
> To: PHPdev
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] congrats and thanks
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to add
;
>
> >>it is a public interface! Unfortunatley we still have no way of
> documenting
> >>classes on the docs page.
> >
> > Thanks. Steph forwarded me this link, which could be provided
> on the docs
> > page as additional reference, until there's
I will do. Did anyone remember that php-gtk-doc needs to align to this when
they were designing it?
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabor Hojtsy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 August 2004 19:40
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; internals; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
I did.
OK. Can you please make sure [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets notification as soon as
this works well in livedoc? I can go from there with aligning our
structure.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Steph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 August 2004 19:51
To: Gabor Hojtsy
Cc: [EMAIL
This could start a few more rumours :\
Looks good in livedocs, is there any good reason for it to be 'ooclass' &&
mode='java' or is this just some hangover item from docbook? For
php-gtk-doc we override docbook with our own dtd, so I'd like to be certain
you're using a long-term strateg
Heh, I don't suppose it supports methods, signals and properties - that'd be
too much to ask!
I'll look into it. Thanks..
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabor Hojtsy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 August 2004 12:58
> To: Steph
> Cc: Gabor Hojtsy; PHP-
o the point
that more than two phpdoc'd OO items are covered in this way.
PHPdoc promises to be a good forum to work this stuff through..
- Steph
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabor Hojtsy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 August 2004 23:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
erm, that'll be docweb I'm thinking of. but the same applies ;)
-Original Message---
From: Steph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 August 2004 00:11
To: Gabor Hojtsy
Cc: DOC-WEB; Andrei; PHPdoc
Subject: RE: [DOC-WEB] FW: [PHP-GTK] what is going on with gtk.php.net?
Goba, the bi
like to hear from whoever put it together in the first place.
I just got karma here, so I'm feeling my way a bit.
cheers
- Steph
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:22 PM
Subject
ps I should make it clear that's the *build* system not the install
system I'm referring to :-I
- Original Message -----
From: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:12 PM
Sub
to provide the two
relevant dlls and a readme in the first zip.
The install instructions currently start with an explanation of why
building on win32 is so complicated and then do everything possible to
make it more complicated :) so it seemed a good place to start.
- Steph
--
PHP Documentation
yeah, my bad. I picked up on the original mail, thought 'good point'
and only read to the end later ..
- Original Message -
From: "Gabor Hojtsy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday,
He's been trying for a very long time :)
Georg, take that back!
- Original Message -
From: "Philip Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Georg Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/mysql refe
We have no problem with it? :)
I wouldn't quite go that far, but certainly it's more flexible than
staying with the docbook dtd would have been. The only issues I've come
across are: 1) we had a clash between a docbook.dtd entity and a
phpgtkdoc.dtd entity which went undiagnosed for way too lon
+1 for splitting
-1 for 'PHP Developers' Manual' vs 'PHP Users' Manual', there is a huge
amount of confusion about this as we all know. Other software projects
don't generally have the same issue with this ..
'PHP Sourcerers' Manual' vs 'PHP Manual'? - we need something _that_
obvious IMHO.
>
http://master.php.net/manage/users.php
- Original Message -
From: "ФʢÎÄ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 3:10 AM
Subject: [PHP-DOC] how to change my cvs forwarding email address?
> hi,
> My old cvs forwarding email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] i
hm, usually it doesn't make any difference - but if I cd to root using
the unix slash it doesn't work.
Microsoft(R) Windows 98
(C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1981-1998.
C:\WINDOWS>cd \
C:\>
Microsoft(R) Windows 98
(C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1981-1998.
C:\WINDOWS>cd /
Invalid switch - /
C
valid, yes. Correct? .. hmm.
surely if you have C:\ in there at all it's win32 documentation,
regardless of the way you point your slashes :)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[
We have more translators than writers on PHP-GTK docs at present. If anyone here
feels like a challenge .. and trust me, GTK+ source is a challenge ... please contact
me [EMAIL PROTECTED] or Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED] and make your sacrifice public :)
Thanks for your time,
Steph
And the recommended person to talk to is Steph as she made the current
gtk manual notes system work. Adding her as a cc. Good luck with this
venture, peardoc should benefit greatly! I wonder why the notes are
disabled for gtk currently, maybe a spam issue?
Not as such, no - it's beca
sfoxFri Apr 25 21:37:40 2008 UTC
Modified files:
/pecl/phar phar_object.c util.c
Log:
- implemented Phar::buildFromDirectory
@Greg: There are two (identical) recurring memleaks I can't seem to kill,
both marked FIXME. Would you please take a look?
[
enabled SAPI
- improve the table output
+function MESSAGE(msg)
+{
+ STDERR.WriteLine("" + msg);
+}
Shouldn't that be STDOUT?
- Steph
+
function ERROR(msg)
{
STDERR.WriteLine("ERROR: " + msg);
--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
hat it really belongs there.
That said, Pascal's already given me a heap of notes to trawl through based
on the existing skeleton :)
- Steph
ps Please cc me in response, I don't subscribe to phpdoc ML.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
[email protected]
85 matches
Mail list logo
