That makes sense. Lets move it out of head and into a branch.
On 11 May, 15:25, "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/11/07, Graham Charters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Simon, yes I did. I had been assured that this would be ok because
> > the 'development in a branch' appr
On 5/11/07, Graham Charters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Simon, yes I did. I had been assured that this would be ok because
> the 'development in a branch' approach is really only necessary for
> native extension code (because pecl4win always pulls this from HEAD).
> Let me know if you thin
Hi Simon, yes I did. I had been assured that this would be ok because
the 'development in a branch' approach is really only necessary for
native extension code (because pecl4win always pulls this from HEAD).
Let me know if you think the binding should go elsewhere.
On 11 May, 14:48, [EMAIL PROTE
Nice Graham. Don't have any feedback yet but a quick question. Did you
mean to check it into HEAD rather than the branch?
Simon
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"phpsoa" group.
To post to this group,
