Thanks. In my case I wanted the object itself to create the new method, so I
did like this:
(push This '(newMsg> () (prinl "Yes!")))
/Jon
> On 10. Jun, 2016, at 13:07, Alexander Burger wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:50:07AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
>> (push Obj (cons 'msg> '((X
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:50:07AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
>(push Obj (cons 'msg> '((X) (bar
>
> or
>
>(push Obj '(msg> (X) (bar)))
Two notes:
1. If the symbol 'msg>' is not yet defined as a message in another
context (e.g. with (dm msg> ...)), then you can do that on the
Thanks, Alex! That was nice and easy.
/Jon
> On 10. Jun, 2016, at 11:50, Alexander Burger wrote:
>
> Hi Jon,
>
>> If one has a few objects of the same class +C, would it be possible to
>> add a new method to just one of these objects, without all the others
>> also getting that new method?
>
Hi Jon,
> If one has a few objects of the same class +C, would it be possible to
> add a new method to just one of these objects, without all the others
> also getting that new method?
You can add a method to an object (or also a class) by adding a cons
pair (msg> . fun) to its value.
(push O
Hi,
If one has a few objects of the same class +C, would it be possible to add a
new method to just one of these objects, without all the others also getting
that new method?
/Jon--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
