Alexander Burger writes:
Hi Alex and José,
> in addition what you have already discussed:
>
>> mark-up syntax is usually symmetric, i.e. the end-tag looks like a
>> 180° mapping of the start-tag (e.g. the JSP Scriplet <% ... %>).
>>
>> This makes parsing the file and constructing regexp much e
Hi Thorsten and José,
in addition what you have already discussed:
> mark-up syntax is usually symmetric, i.e. the end-tag looks like a
> 180° mapping of the start-tag (e.g. the JSP Scriplet <% ... %>).
>
> This makes parsing the file and constructing regexp much easier, because
> its always cl
José Romero writes:
> It's not an improvement, and not worth it, imo. The current wiki syntax
> is pretty much a lightweight variant of TeX, Emacs can fontify TeX just
> fine, so the issue is in the emacs mode, not the syntax.
It does look pretty ugly, I agree, and I wasn't sure myself if it wou
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:29:13 +0100
Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> when writing the picolisp-wiki-mode for Emacs, I began to understand
> why mark-up syntax is usually symmetric, i.e. the end-tag looks like a
> 180° mapping of the start-tag (e.g. the JSP Scriplet <% ... %>).
>
> This
Hi List,
when writing the picolisp-wiki-mode for Emacs, I began to understand why
mark-up syntax is usually symmetric, i.e. the end-tag looks like a
180° mapping of the start-tag (e.g. the JSP Scriplet <% ... %>).
This makes parsing the file and constructing regexp much easier, because
its alw
