I literally agonized on the decision of whether to comment further or not,
the truth is when topics like this come up, the tips of my fingers itch
badly with the urge to write, after all, we could be on the verge of , well
forget it I better not go there!
> - Original Message -
> From: hey
- Original Message -
From: "Edward Levinson"
>
> I once hung one my abstract Cityscapes images upside at an exhibition and
> didn't notice it was upside down until a week after the opening! It looked
> okay either way (it was an image of escalators and ceiling lights inside a
> building) b
George and Gord
I once hung one my abstract Cityscapes images upside at an exhibition and
didn't notice it was upside down until a week after the opening! It looked
okay either way (it was an image of escalators and ceiling lights inside a
building) but I preferred it the "proper way".
Ed
>A whi
I used this theory to start with, (the difference between f-stops = number of
flashes) but i found it to be insufficient. i found that i got good results
from multiplying the difference by 1.5. (So; exposure = the difference of meter
reading and camera aperture x 1.5)
EG; meter = f-64, camera =
