Hello:
Well, after all that ruckus I started about the 127 and 620 cameras I bought
to convert to pinhole, the cost and availability of film, awkwardness of
development and discouragement from hacking the cameras led me back to eBay.
I feel like some fool watching the Home Shopping Network.
I bou
on 11/13/2001 4:04 PM, Jack Duganne at duga...@earthlink.net wrote:
>>>
>> here is a listing on e-bay for duraclear paper - good price
>
> jack
>
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1294059223
>
There is a bunch of that (Duraclear)on EBay now in the photo section...
andy
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of R Duarte
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:42 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subje
> I also use 10X12 half-tone film and develop with dilute Dektol. The
pictures
> "Jimmy" at http://members.home.net/hmpi/Pinhole/Images/PinholeImages.htm
and
> "We Are Glad you Are Here" at
> http://members.home.net/hmpi/AltProcess/Images/AltImages.htm were made
this
> way. The advantage of this
Duraclear or Duratrans?
on 11/13/2001 3:42 PM, R Duarte at ra...@rahji.com wrote:
> There's an exhibit at Massachusetts College of Art right now that I think
> uses this stuff. The gallery is kind of dark and the 20x24(?) color prints
> are each in their own custom-made light boxes. I think they're printed on
> that Du
Jeremy wrote:
One idea that I did have was to use a special projector that can project
images from "opaque" sources. These projectors really exist, my highschool
art class had one (we used it to enlarge images from books and project them
onto the wall). They work like overhead (transparency) proj
Katharine Thayer wrote:
Reading the rest of the thread I see the rest of you are talking about
color paper; I was talking about black and white paper. Sorry about the
misreading...
Hi Katharine, I personally was talking about B&W paper negatives only. I
always use single weight paper. My primary
There's an exhibit at Massachusetts College of Art right now that I think
uses this stuff. The gallery is kind of dark and the 20x24(?) color prints
are each in their own custom-made light boxes. I think they're printed on
that Duraclear stuff - I heard from a photo major in one of my classes tha
Ive seen these in craft stores like Micheals and hobby lobby.
In a message dated 11/13/2001 10:21:43 AM Eastern Standard Time,
geme...@hotmail.com writes:
<< I do not think eather 116 or 616 film is made; only 120 today. >>
Actually, it is still available through specialty film mail-order companies.
It's pricey, though.
Maggie
they're actually easy to come by. a company called artograph makes a bunch
of different models. i have a really cheap one that i got from A.C. Moore
(a craft store chain in the US) for about $7! it works but the lens
obviously isn't as good as the kind you'd find in an enlarger or something.
ro
this one? http://www.rahji.com/noindex/pinholexmas.php3
(btw, it's not a xmas swap.. i just didn't change the url since i didn't
want people who got it early on to get confused.)
rob
> From: aa...@deadlettertype.com
> Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
> Date: 13 Nov 2001 10:39:50 -0800
>
In the past I have thought of ways to enlarge paper
negatives, but never got around to it (I just decided
to build cameras that will take bigger paper
negatives).
One idea that I did have was to use a special
projector that can project images from "opaque"
sources. These projectors really exist,
i'm curious whata kind of oil you put on the paper negs? does it make a huge
difference in the positive?
also i was hoping that somebody could repost the web address of the list of
participants in the print swap, i seem to have lost it...
/aaron
Guillermo wrote:
> Same problem, Guy.
...arg!
> If you already have 116 film and have two 616 spools, re-spooling your 116 on
> 616 is an option too.
I do, but I haaate respooling...
Thanks Guillermo and Gordy!
Guy
testing...
a happy life is made up of many happy moments
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Glorieux"
> I just discovered that I have a Kodak 616 folder with negative sizes 4
> 1/4 x 2 1/2 that is virtually new. Inside it says to use 616 format.
> Can I put in 116 format or will I run into the same problems as 120 vs
> 620?
Same problem, Guy.
1
I think it is a spindle problem...I went through my "box of antiquities"
(junk box according to others... & came up with a BRAND NEW ROLL of VP616!
It only went out of date in 1971. Though knowing verichrome pan, it's
probably still good
I could let you have it for some princely sum befitting i
> I do not think eather 116 or 616 film is made; only 120 today.
> Gordy
116 and 616 were discontinued in 1984. See:
http://www.geocities.com/thombell/oldroll.html
> I know we had a discussion about the availabilty of 116 film recently.
> However, I can't remember if this covered the question of 616 format vs
> 116 format.
>
> I just discovered that I have a Kodak 616 folder with negative sizes 4
> 1/4 x 2 1/2 that is virtually new. Inside it says to use 61
I do not think eather 116 or 616 film is made; only 120 today.
Gordy
From: Guy Glorieux
Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
To: Pinhole List
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] 116 vs 616 film?
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:53:08 -0500
Hi,
I know we had a discussion about the availabilty of 116
Hi,
I know we had a discussion about the availabilty of 116 film recently.
However, I can't remember if this covered the question of 616 format vs
116 format.
I just discovered that I have a Kodak 616 folder with negative sizes 4
1/4 x 2 1/2 that is virtually new. Inside it says to use 616 forma
Katharine Thayer wrote:
> Reading the rest of the thread I see the rest of you are talking about
> color paper; I was talking about black and white paper. Sorry about the
> misreading...
Katharine,
You did'nt misread! The discussion strated with using 4X5 black and white
paper negatives in the
24 matches
Mail list logo
