Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-05 Thread W. Thoma
ritab19...@aol.com wrote: > > I have Lubitels also and have never really understood about using the > "sports finder." Is it really a fairly accurate rendition of the > composition?? > > Rita "Fairly accurate" is perhaps to much, but using the Lubitel with the original lens, it's much better (q

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-05 Thread Eric Mitchell
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 2:34 AM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel I have Lubitels also and have never really understood about using the "sports finder." Is it really a fairly accurate rendition of the composition?? Rita

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-05 Thread Eric Mitchell
:34 AM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel I have Lubitels also and have never really understood about using the "sports finder." Is it really a fairly accurate rendition of the composition?? Rita

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-05 Thread Eric Mitchell
From: "Stewart C. Russell" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:55 AM Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel > Brunson, Shannon wrote: > > > > Hi I am new to Pinhole photography. Has anyone had any experience with > > those zero image cameras advertised on the sit

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-05 Thread riguto
5 August 2003 1055 To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel Brunson, Shannon wrote: Hi I am new to Pinhole photography. Has anyone had any experience with those zero image cameras advertised on the site? yes, I have the Zero 2000 6x6, which I bought secondhan

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-05 Thread klaus
hi, indeed, I bought my zero 2000 one year ago and I love that pinhole camera :-) Really easy to handle. http://www.lomograph.com/pinholeday2003/worldpinholeday_2003.htm by klaus Zitat von "Stewart C. Russell" : > Brunson, Shannon wrote: > > > > Hi I am new to Pinhole photography. Has anyone h

RE: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-05 Thread Mark Interrante
Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Brunson, Shannon Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 2:52 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel Hi I am new to Pinhole photography. Has

RE: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-04 Thread Adrian Morgan
5 > To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel > > > Brunson, Shannon wrote: > > > > Hi I am new to Pinhole photography. Has anyone had any experience with > > those zero image cameras advertised on the site? > > ye

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-04 Thread Stewart C. Russell
Brunson, Shannon wrote: > Hi I am new to Pinhole photography. Has anyone had any experience with those zero image cameras advertised on the site? yes, I have the Zero 2000 6x6, which I bought secondhand. Couldn't be happier with it. Some of my pinhole photos -- about half with the Zero 2000

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-01 Thread W. Thoma
Brian Reynolds wrote: > > What trouble have you had using the viewer on a Lubitel? > > I have a pair of Lubitel 166 Universals that I use for > stereophotography and the viewers are fairly nice. They have much > better viewers than the Sputnik (stereo cousin of the Lubitel). > Just the standar

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-01 Thread Ritab19106
I have Lubitels also and have never really understood about using the "sports finder." Is it really a fairly accurate rendition of the composition?? Rita

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-08-01 Thread Brian Reynolds
W. Thoma wrote: > "W. Thoma" wrote: > > CJ Rumpolo wrote: > > > Hi, I was thinking that the viewing lens would help in > > > previewing the image. Any responses would be most appreciated. > > > > As with all 2eyed cameras, it's difficult to use the viewing > lens. But the Lubitel 166 (in any case m

RE: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-07-31 Thread Brunson, Shannon
Hi I am new to Pinhole photography. Has anyone had any experience with those zero image cameras advertised on the site? http://www.chubbinstitute.com

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-07-31 Thread W. Thoma
"W. Thoma" wrote: > > CJ Rumpolo wrote: > > > > Hi, I was thinking that the viewing lens would help in previewing the > > image. Any > > responses would be most appreciated. > > As with all 2eyed cameras, it's difficult to use the viewing lens. But the Lubitel 166 (in any case mine) has a so call

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-07-31 Thread W. Thoma
CJ Rumpolo wrote: > > Hi, I was wondering if anyone has any first hand experience with converting > a lubitel 166 into a pinhole. I have heard that it is quite easy. I was > thinking that the viewing lens would help in previewing the image. Any > responses would be most appreciated. > Daryl has o

[pinhole-discussion] Lubitel

2003-07-31 Thread CJ Rumpolo
Hi, I was wondering if anyone has any first hand experience with converting a lubitel 166 into a pinhole. I have heard that it is quite easy. I was thinking that the viewing lens would help in previewing the image. Any responses would be most appreciated.