[pinhole-discussion] list update

2000-08-21 Thread Gregg Kemp
As long as things are a bit quiet on the list, I would just like to check in and make sure the transition to the new list has gone ok. I've heard from a small handful of people - only about 3 who experienced some problems, and about a dozen saying things went fine. So, I'm assuming things are

Re: [pinhole-discussion] list update

2000-08-24 Thread George L Smyth
> I don't know what it is that makes this list so "collaborative, > understanding and tolerant", but I'd be more interested in keeping it like > this than in finding the reason. It's difficult to get too worked up over things because pinholers all look for different results. That being the case,

Re: [pinhole-discussion] list update

2000-08-24 Thread TSHACK
> I don't know what it is that makes this list so "collaborative, > understanding and tolerant", but I'd be more interested in keeping it like > this than in finding the reason. Probably because we're already used to not being able to see what we're shooting at, and don't get upset when things com

Re: [pinhole-discussion] list update

2000-08-23 Thread Benno Jones
I agree. I've pointed this community out several times as one where flame wars hardly ever happen. I think that being interested in pinhole photography shows a mindset already open to alternatives and different ways of thinking and seeing the world. I think that most flame posts come about due t

Re: [pinhole-discussion] list update

2000-08-23 Thread G.Penate
> I like to think that this list has less flaming because photographers have > more of a tendency to think first before replying... Pinhole photographers you mean, don't you? 'cause I've been subscriber of some other photo lists in the past and they can and do get nasty sometimes I don't know wh

Re: [pinhole-discussion] list update

2000-08-23 Thread Mike Vande Bunt
Michael Downend wrote: > Gregg, > Only one problem that I can see and that just occurred. When I hit Reply to > respond to your post duplicate addresses appeared in the To window. I've > left them unchanged for your review. Other than that I find the list > informative, active (posts virtually eve

RE: [pinhole-discussion] list update

2000-08-22 Thread Amy Riley
: Gregg Kemp [SMTP:gregg.kemp@p at ???] Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 10:19 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject:[pinhole-discussion] list update As long as things are a bit quiet on the list, I would just like to check in and make sure the transition to the new list has

Re: [pinhole-discussion] list update

2000-08-22 Thread Michael Downend
GUILD (dramaguild.com) WATCH FOR BARBRA STREISAND'S PRODUCTION OF OUR PROJECT, A TRICK OF LIGHT. - Original Message - From: "Gregg Kemp" To: Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 10:18 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] list update > As long as things are a bit quiet on the list, I w

Re: [pinhole-discussion] list update

2000-08-22 Thread Erich C. Decker
Hi, Thanks for adding my name to the pinhole-discussion board. > Hope everyone is enjoying the end of summer, > taking those pinhole photos... My summerbreak is yet to come You bet there will be enough room in a suitcase for tripod, film boxes and all the stuff I need to set up a "mini-l