I’ve updated the policy in commit
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/website.git/commit/?id=98531f7af530cbb571429a680e86a57ab936e86f
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Alexandre Viau
wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On 11/09/15 03:57 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>> That’s a fair point as well. Do
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:57:31PM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> That’s a fair point as well. Do you want to file a bug against the
> package in question?
Totally, filed as bug #798708
We can move discussion if this is a good idea or not over to that bug.
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Desc
Hello Michael,
On 11/09/15 03:57 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> That’s a fair point as well. Do you want to file a bug against the
> package in question?
I will.
Should we also update our policy? We could state that tools should be
shipped in -tools packages and that -dev packages should only c
That’s a fair point as well. Do you want to file a bug against the
package in question?
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:07:36PM -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote:
>> About that, should -dev packages contain binaries? Would it be best that
>> dev pac
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:07:36PM -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> About that, should -dev packages contain binaries? Would it be best that
> dev packages stay arch:all and ship their binaries in a separated package?
I tend to say "yes" - the -dev files aren't arch dependent, and shipping
the binar
Hello Michael,
On 11/09/15 02:36 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> I agree that setting Built-Using on the -dev packages does not make
> sense as long as they don’t contain binaries. golang-gogoprotobuf-dev
> is an example where the -dev package does contain binaries.
About that, should -dev packag
I agree that setting Built-Using on the -dev packages does not make
sense as long as they don’t contain binaries. golang-gogoprotobuf-dev
is an example where the -dev package does contain binaries.
As the vast majority of -dev packages does not actually contain
binaries, I’m happy to accept a pull
Hello team,
During my NM process, I was asked to justify the use of Built-Using on
golang dev packages.
In the past, I was asked to add it to my golang dev packages by a
sponsor from the team.
I don't think that the intent of the Built-Using field described in the
Debian policy fits with this ki
