Hi Andrius,
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 09:58:18AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> > * diffoscope_198: not enough disk space to rebuild locally, will look
> > for another machine.
>
> Does not fail with xom_1.3.7+ds-2.
I was also able to build diffoscope_199 successfully with xom 1.3.7:
Hello,
On 2022-01-06 11:04, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> I have just uploaded xom v1.3.7 to experimental and pushed the packaging
> to a branch. Test-rebuild with ratt of 137 was successful except for
> RC-buggy packages plus the following ones:
I have uploaded xom_1.3.7+ds-2 to experimental, fixing
Hello,
I have just uploaded xom v1.3.7 to experimental and pushed the packaging
to a branch. Test-rebuild with ratt of 137 was successful except for
RC-buggy packages plus the following ones:
* starjava-ttools_3.4-2: not sure if xom-related, will sort out in
experimental
* libeuclid-java_1.6-1:
Am Dienstag, dem 04.01.2022 um 16:45 +0200 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
> Hello,
>
> I have packaged successfully packaged xom v1.3.7 locally and launched
> ratt to test-rebuild the reverse dependencies. 81 of 137 of them are
> done at the moment, all of the failures happened in already RC-buggy
>
Hello,
I have packaged successfully packaged xom v1.3.7 locally and launched
ratt to test-rebuild the reverse dependencies. 81 of 137 of them are
done at the moment, all of the failures happened in already RC-buggy
packages.
Is it OK for me to:
1. Push my packaging to a branch in xom repo on
Source: xom
Hello,
debian/watch for xom is failing, but the watched site does not seem to
be up-to-date enough. The watched site provides a link to GitHub [1],
which contains many more recent releases. I suggest switching
debian/watch to GitHub site, and package the newest upstream from there.
