Accepted:
libuima-adapter-soap-java_2.3.0-1_all.deb
to main/u/uimaj/libuima-adapter-soap-java_2.3.0-1_all.deb
libuima-adapter-vinci-java_2.3.0-1_all.deb
to main/u/uimaj/libuima-adapter-vinci-java_2.3.0-1_all.deb
libuima-core-java_2.3.0-1_all.deb
to
Package: libcglib-java
Version: 2.2
Severity: important
I just ran into the equivalent of the compatibility problem between
libasm1/2 and libasm3 dragged in from multiple jars. This is
obviously rather annoying and the -nodeps binary was proposed
here
FYI: The status of the libaopalliance-java source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 20070526-3
Current version: 20070526-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
severity 582146 important
thanks
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:06:31PM +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
Package: sun-java6-bin
Version: 6.20-dlj-1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.20/jre/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Reporting of system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 582146 important
Bug #582146 [sun-java6-bin]
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.20/jre/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so: browser plugin
reporting of system fonts is a privacy leak
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing
Package: sun-java6-jre
Version: 6.20-dlj
Debian Release: squeeze
When I try to install any Java library, dpkg suggests to install gcj
environment packages, while sun-java6-jre package should be enough.
Expected: liblog4j1.2-java is installed without other dependencies.
The same result with
reassign 583260 liblog4j1.2-java
found 583260 1.2.15-11
thanks
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Dmitry Katsubo dm...@mail.ru wrote:
# apt-get install liblog4j1.2-java
...
gcj-4.4-base gcj-4.4-jre-lib libgcj-bc libgcj-common libgcj10
liblog4j1.2-java-gcj python-central
The Recommends:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 583260 liblog4j1.2-java
Bug #583260 [sun-java6-jre] dpkg suggests to install gcj packages when Sun JRE
is installed
Bug reassigned from package 'sun-java6-jre' to 'liblog4j1.2-java'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 6.20-dlj.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Thiemo Nagel
thiemo.na...@googlemail.com wrote:
Reporting of system fonts by browser plugins may lead to total loss of
anonymity
A total loss of anonymity from just a font list? Really? Isn't that a
bit too far-fetched? Did you already some research in
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Patrick Holthuizen patr...@eaze.org wrote:
Package: sun-java6-jre
Versions: 6-20-0lenny1
...
(/var/lib/apt/lists/http.us.debian.org_debian_dists_lenny-proposed-updates_non-free_binary-i386_Packages)
Neither i386 nor ia64 packages have been built for
Package: hsqldb
Maintainer: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org
Changed-By: Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org
Architecture: source all amd64
Changes:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Install POM file for hsqldb.jar. (Closes: #581851)
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Package: glassfish
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org
Architecture: source all
Changes:
* UNRELEASED
* Install POM and jar for Java Messaging Service (JMS).
__
This is the maintainer address of
Hi,
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:45:25PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
Neither i386 nor ia64 packages have been built for proposed-updates so
far (maybe because sun-java6 is a non-free package). But this is not a
bug in the package. I am Cc-ing the release team to get some
No, this is a bug in
Package: jinput
Version: 20100502+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
jinput's debian/control lists default-jdk and libjutils-java in
Build-Depends-Indep rather than Build-Depends even though the
override_dh_auto_build target in debian/rules relies on both AFAICT.
14 matches
Mail list logo
