Re: Qt4's Webkit in Stretch

2016-01-25 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 05:16:26PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Hi everyone! I would like to discuss the current situation for Qt4's Webkit > in > Stretch. > > Let me first start with some facts: > > = Facts = > > - Both Qt4 and (by inclusion) Qt4's webkit are no longer

Re: Qt4's Webkit in Stretch

2016-01-25 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi Sandro! On Sunday 24 January 2016 03:22:47 Sandro Knauß wrote: > Hey, > > > And now that the facts are on the table I will give you my personal > > opinion: even if lots of important apps depend on it I would remove it at > > least from testing. > > I can understand your option and also think

Re: Qt4's Webkit in Stretch

2016-01-25 Thread Adam Majer
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 05:43:59PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > And now that the facts are on the table I will give you my personal opinion: > even if lots of important apps depend on it I would remove it at least from > testing. Removing it is probably best way forward f

Re: Qt4's Webkit in Stretch

2016-01-25 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 05:43:59PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > And now that the facts are on the table I will give you my personal opinion: > even if lots of important apps depend on it I would remove it at least from > testing. That's what I think we should do, too. --

Re: Debian, (Py)Qt5 and QtWebKit

2016-01-25 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
My original response was rejected by lists.alioth.debian.org because the domain Qt uses for mailing lists is blacklisted. Re-sending it again with a couple of different links (to the mailing list only, as the CCed people already got it)… ---

Re: Debian, (Py)Qt5 and QtWebKit

2016-01-25 Thread Kovid Goyal
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:01:44AM +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote: > * Kovid Goyal [2016-01-25 14:25:01 +0530]: > > Realistically speaking, the job of replacing WebKit with WebEngine > > everywhere it is used is impossible. It would take man years of effort > > with no reward -- other than causing re

Re: Debian, (Py)Qt5 and QtWebKit

2016-01-25 Thread Kovid Goyal
Realistically speaking, the job of replacing WebKit with WebEngine everywhere it is used is impossible. It would take man years of effort with no reward -- other than causing regressions for end users and bug reports for maintainers. WebEngine is only a direct replacement for WebKit in the most sup

Re: Debian, (Py)Qt5 and QtWebKit

2016-01-25 Thread Florian Bruhin
* Kovid Goyal [2016-01-25 14:25:01 +0530]: > Realistically speaking, the job of replacing WebKit with WebEngine > everywhere it is used is impossible. It would take man years of effort > with no reward -- other than causing regressions for end users and bug > reports for maintainers. WebEngine is