glyr_1.0.8-1~exp1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-02-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:33:03 +0100 Source: glyr Binary: libglyr1 libglyr1-dbg libglyr-dev libglyr-doc glyrc Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.0.8-1~exp1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

2015-02-19 Thread Tino Mettler
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 22:46 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: me too (and I am personally interested in ptp packages). however, i would welcome it if the package would be team-maintained under the pkg-multimedia umbrella. Hi, thanks for the offer. anyhow, i'm currently doing

x265_1.5-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2015-02-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:54:07 +0100 Source: x265 Binary: x265 libx265-dev libx265-43 libx265-43-dbg libx265-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia

Bug#775181: marked as done (x265-10bit doesn't work)

2015-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:00:07 + with message-id e1yontv-vk...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#775181: fixed in x265 1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #775181, regarding x265-10bit doesn't work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

2015-02-19 Thread Tino Mettler
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 09:57 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: FWIW, I also prefer git-buildpackage. Whenever I've seen gitpkg it is too complex to use, as it requires configuration by the user. On the other hand, git-buildpackage is as simple as: gbp clone/pull ; gbp buildpackage. Hi, how does

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

2015-02-19 Thread Tino Mettler
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 14:13 +0100, Tino Mettler wrote: how does patch management work with git-buildpackage? In gitpkg, I use a patches branch and patches are autogenerated when building the source package using git format-patch. Hi, I just saw that there is git-pq which seems to work

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

2015-02-19 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Tino Mettler tino.mett...@alcnetworx.de wrote: On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 22:46 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: me too (and I am personally interested in ptp packages). however, i would welcome it if the package would be team-maintained under the

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

2015-02-19 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Tino Mettler tino.mett...@alcnetworx.de wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 14:13 +0100, Tino Mettler wrote: how does patch management work with git-buildpackage? In gitpkg, I use a patches branch and patches are autogenerated when building the source package using

Re: vlevel_0.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED with python backtrace, then ACCEPTED, but still not in the package list

2015-02-19 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org writes: I've uploaded vlevel again signed with my new key and it got accepted on 13th of February 2015, i.e. like five days ago. This is more than enough time to propagate to the buildds, but the package hasn't been built yet on any buildd. Nevertheless the

Bug#778777: src:libffado: FTBFS on x32: uses -m32

2015-02-19 Thread Adam Borowski
Package: src:libffado Version: 2.2.1-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: port-x32 ftbfs-x32 Hi! I'm afraid libffado tries to use -m32 on x32 (instead of -mx32, or, better, no such switch at all). This is because of pretty bizarre platform detection, which