Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override file needs to be updated for the following packages.
libvo-aacenc-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
libvo-aacenc0_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
These
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The override file needs to be updated for the following packages.
i965-va-driver_1.0.16-1_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says
libs.
i965-va-driver_1.0.16-1_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
This is now a
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-03-18 at 12:22pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard
>> wrote:
>> > On 12-03-17 at 02:49pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> >> That pretty much means libdvdc
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-03-17 at 02:49pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> That pretty much means libdvdcss can be compiled on Debian down to
>> old-stable (if backports is used) and Ubuntu oneiric. For supporting
>> Ubuntu suites before on
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
>> About these latest changes, I removed the build dependency on
>> dh-autoreconf because a) it wasn't necessary, and b) because if we are
>
> It is, because we add
> libdvdcss_la_CFLAGS = -fvisibility=hidden
> in src/Makefile.am
> through
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, wrote:
> The branch, master has been created
> at c4c77bca931e1dd7e0cce072985e694fcd5bb2e4 (commit)
>
> - Shortlog
> commit c4c77bca931e1dd7e0cce072985e694fcd5bb2e4
> Au
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:37 PM, wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit 15c3fdd600ad05440cfc3b9016897c523de68c0d
> Author: Andres Mejia
> Date: Sat Mar 17 14:36:37 2012 -0400
>
> Update changelog.
>
> diff --git a/debian/chan
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Chris S. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> As a new Debian user, I believe I read the following document about
> multimedia codes:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/MultimediaCodecs
>
> However, as noted on the following two pages, Debian does n
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:15 PM, wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit 0479ff2df5488335ee5d35de014a616410ec0add
> Author: Andres Mejia
> Date: Fri Mar 16 17:14:20 2012 -0400
>
> Set release as UNRELEASED.
> Current release has
This thread is from debian-devel. Would anyone here who had a lot of
experience working (or dealing) with Marillat like to respond?
~ Andres
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Stefano Zacchiroli"
Date: Mar 5, 2012 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: Unofficial repositories on 'debian' domains
To:
Ah yes sorry. Alioth was down when I uploaded and I forgot to push my
changes afterwards.
I can't push until later tonight.
~ Andres
On Feb 13, 2012 8:56 AM, "Fabian Greffrath" wrote:
> Am 31.01.2012 08:55, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
>
>> Thanks, Andres. Could you please push your Git tree to Al
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> tags 659165 patch
> thanks
>
> Hi all!
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
>> Trying to build xine-lib-1.2 in a clean chroot wiht Recommends turned off
>> results
>> in a lot of java packages being included as build-de
This is not going to be accepted. Look at copyright and grep
'SmartMovie'. That license is certainly non-free. Also, the license
other-1 is non-free to me. Software has to conform to MPEG-U Widgets
(ISO/IEC 23007-1) standard. The "other-3" license is vague and needs
clarification, or the file shoul
On Feb 1, 2012 10:03 AM, "Reinhard Tartler" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 12-02-01 at 10:24am, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> >> Am 31.01.2012 17:55, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> >> >Legally, I don't think there is much difference here. However, there
> >> >
Here are the patches. Something is wrong with sourceforge I think. I'm
able to view them correctly from sourceforge sometimes.
--
~ Andres
Description: Include GTK-1 autoconf directives in build system.
Origin: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/lame.git;a=tree;f=debian/patches
-
On Jan 13, 2012 9:25 AM, "Andres Mejia" wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2012 6:40 AM, "Alessio Treglia" wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Fabian Greffrath
wrote:
> > > Should the packages get built twice, once without optimization for
the deb
On Jan 13, 2012 6:40 AM, "Alessio Treglia" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Fabian Greffrath
wrote:
> > Should the packages get built twice, once without optimization for the
debug
> > package and once with optimization for the actual shared library
package? Or
> > is it necessary to
ckage. Note that with the package
being built with -O3 and -fomit-frame-pointer, using the debug package
will be next to useless.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
35f0b8c
> Author: Andres Mejia
> Date: Sun Dec 25 12:14:54 2011 -0500
>
> Add fix for build failure of double installation of images.
>
> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> index 3022654..0642d5b 100644
> --- a/debian/changelog
> +++ b/debian/change
ase consider applying these to the lame source tree.
1. anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/lame.git;a=tree;f=debian/patches
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
xtra-52_0.7.1.3_amd64.deb - optional libs
> libswscale-extra-2_0.7.1.3_amd64.deb - optional libs
>
> Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
>
>
> Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
>
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-mult
Package: libav-extra
Version: 4:0.7.1.3
Severity: important
If libav-dbg is installed in the system, any of the libav-extra libraries are
uninstallable.
I think a libav-extra-dbg package should be built from libav-extra. This would
mean that ffmpeg-dbg would need to have 'Depends: libav-dbg | lib
ilman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Sep 19, 2011 11:44 AM, wrote:
>
> The annotated tag, debian/4%0.7.1-5 has been created
>at 684599816023303e0b6e890854a69c2730b368f5 (tag)
> tagging 52b3b37e0e9add66c4374b796b2404af36678fe4 (commit)
> replaces debian/4%0.7.1-4
> tagged by Reinhard Tartler
>on Mon Sep 5 0
media-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
>
I see a new version had been uploaded to unstable. The changes never
been pu
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sa, Sep 17, 2011 at 09:55:24 (PDT), ceros-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
> wrote:
>
>> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
>> commit 4f5963cb9009059abaf4a3d71f56dbbe6cda0a46
>> Au
On Aug 26, 2011 4:55 AM, "Reinhard Tartler" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 23:14:39 (CEST), Andres Mejia wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Debian FTP Masters
> > wrote:
> >> lame_3.98.4+repack2-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfull
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 22:29, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Fabian Greffrath
>> wrote:
>>> Am 11.08.2011 05:22, schrieb Andres Mejia:
>>>>
>>>> I have seen a
the LDAP
(to include my new key) and dak doesn't like those keys. I've been
told to wait until this is resolved.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
h
ners@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
>
Ping Allesio.
I see libaacs was accepted. Can you provide us with the reason
libdvdcss was rejected? I don't believe anyone else received a reason
from ftp-master.
--
Regards,
On Aug 10, 2011 3:47 PM, wrote:
>
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit f0dab4aa25fa51c851c8190ef172194ecc275a80
> Author: Reinhard Tartler
> Date: Wed Aug 10 21:44:23 2011 +0200
>
>Unbreak compilation with gcc 4.4
>
>This patch is only necessary before g
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 11.08.2011 05:22, schrieb Andres Mejia:
>>
>> I have seen a commit with mp4v2 that disables building of the static
>> library. Though I know binaries in Debian are normally linked with
>> shared librari
I have seen a commit with mp4v2 that disables building of the static
library. Though I know binaries in Debian are normally linked with shared
libraries, distributing the static library is beneficial to users with
different requirements for software they distribute.
I have heard of various use cas
On Aug 10, 2011 3:18 PM, wrote:
>
> libmp4v2-2_1.9.1+svn479~dfsg0-1
>
> Honestly, I consider it complete bogus to repack an entire tarball just to
> get rid of a few kB of unrelated Windows source files. AFAICT these are
> not even binary files with dubious license or similar.
>
> Has this been co
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> 2011/7/29 Rogério Brito :
>>> Hi there.
>>>
>>> Just an update to the LAME-side of the discussion, LAME just got
>>> accepted (with the r
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> 2011/7/29 Rogério Brito :
>> Hi there.
>>
>> Just an update to the LAME-side of the discussion, LAME just got
>> accepted (with the replacement of the files by Apple) in Debian's
>> unstable distribution,
Package: libvpx
Severity: wishlist
A new release (0.9.7) has been made available.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LAN
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:33 PM, wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit cbc873db2346e788eca96db7084be73fd1d4aa39
> Author: Andres Mejia
> Date: Thu Aug 4 19:32:06 2011 -0400
>
> Include fix for alpha builds.
> alpha builds n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
* Package name: gpac
Version : 0.4.5+svn3450
Upstream Author : Jean Le Feuvre
* URL : http://gpac.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : multimedia frame
ers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
>
I had to make another upload to fix this compiler warning, since it's
from the new portableio code. I left all other
2011/7/29 Rogério Brito :
> Hi there.
>
> Just an update to the LAME-side of the discussion, LAME just got
> accepted (with the replacement of the files by Apple) in Debian's
> unstable distribution, by inclusion of the following patch of Andres:
>
> 2011/7/
---
libmp3lame/i386/Makefile.am |8 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libmp3lame/i386/Makefile.am b/libmp3lame/i386/Makefile.am
index a375225..295f1bc 100644
--- a/libmp3lame/i386/Makefile.am
+++ b/libmp3lame/i386/Makefile.am
@@ -53,11 +53,9 @@ NASMFLAGS=@
*
- * Machine-independent I/O routines for 8-, 16-, 24-, and 32-bit integers.
- *
- * Motorola processors (Macintosh, Sun, Sparc, MIPS, etc)
- * pack bytes from high to low (they are big-endian).
- * Use the HighLow routines to match the native format
- * of these machines.
+/* Simple I/O Functio
---
Makefile.am|3 ++-
configure.in |2 +-
debian/Makefile.am | 21 -
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 debian/Makefile.am
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 24b60f4..ee731bc 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/M
---
Makefile.am |2 +
acinclude.m4| 281 ---
configure.in|1 +
m4/acinclude.m4 | 281 +++
4 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 281 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 acinclude
---
acinclude.m4 | 193 ++
1 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4
index 0b8f869..eef0c3d 100644
--- a/acinclude.m4
+++ b/acinclude.m4
@@ -85,4 +85,197 @@ int main(void)
[AC_MSG_WARN(can'
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:57 PM, wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit 39dd042a15a286f7c70b3f59048dd6fb1146e938
> Author: Andres Mejia
> Date: Sat Jul 30 13:57:08 2011 -0400
>
> Correct copyright information about code from
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
The page at 'http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package' should be
updated. LAME has been accepted into Debian, thus the bullet point mentioning
LAME and other packages similar to LAME is no longer true.
See also http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lam
by lame.
I'm checking the copyright information for gpac right now to get it
uploaded, and then I want to continue work on a RAR implementation I'm
helping develop in libarchive. Any work I do for mjpegtools will
likely not be anytime soon.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
__
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> 2011/7/28 Gabriel Bouvigne :
>> Rogério Brito a écrit :
>>
>>>> We outright disable the use of the GTK frontend, since it requires a very
>>>> old version of GTK. I think there are better tools out now
27;s disabled because of the "AM_PATH_GTK" macro in configure.in.
Perhaps the m4 file that defines this macro should be included with
lame then.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Jul 28, 2011 1:28 PM, "Andres Mejia" wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2011 12:43 PM, "Rogério Brito" wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Andres
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 13:26, Andres Mejia wrote:
> > > On Jul 28, 2011 3:15 AM, "Rogério Brito"
On Jul 28, 2011 12:43 PM, "Rogério Brito" wrote:
>
> Hi, Andres
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 13:26, Andres Mejia wrote:
> > On Jul 28, 2011 3:15 AM, "Rogério Brito" wrote:
> >> Can you please send "git format-patch/git send-email" patc
On Jul 28, 2011 3:15 AM, "Rogério Brito" wrote:
>
> Hi, Andreas and others.
>
> On Jul 27 2011, Andres Mejia wrote:
> > 2011/7/27 Rogério Brito :
> > > Oh, shit. I'll take a look at that... I thought that the code were
> > > ifdef'ed... Is
tery, but
> I won't be able to compile stuff here.
>
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 14:41, Andres Mejia wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 26, 2011 12:49 PM, "robert" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> From my point of view, there may be some sma
gt; brief. (Oh, please keep in the CC'ies to me).
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 14:41, Andres Mejia wrote:
>>> On Jul 26, 2011 12:49 PM, "robert" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Rogério.
>>>>
>>>> Am 26.07.2011, 16:24 Uhr, sc
On Jul 27, 2011 1:48 PM, "Rogério Brito" wrote:
>
> Dear people,
>
> I'm in the middle of a power outage right now, using the last few
> drops of energy of notebook battery and a 3G connection, so I will be
> brief. (Oh, please keep in the CC'ies to me).
>
On Jul 26, 2011 12:49 PM, "robert" wrote:
>
> Hi Rogério.
>
> Am 26.07.2011, 16:24 Uhr, schrieb Rogério Brito :
>
>
>>> We're just waiting for a new release of lame with all the license
>>> clarification changes before uploading lame to Debian. :-)
>>
>>
>> I don't think that we will be able to re
On Jul 26, 2011 10:24 AM, "Rogério Brito" wrote:
>
> Hi, Andres.
>
> On Jul 26 2011, Andres Mejia wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Andres Mejia
wrote:
> > x264 which was in a similar situation as lame was just accepted into
Debian.
> > http://li
On Jul 26, 2011 7:40 AM, "Debian FTP Masters" <
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Reject Reasons:
> xvidcore_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz file already exists in the New directory.
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious to know if there will be another release of lame soon. I
> ask since it seems with some recent activity in Debian, lame will
> finally be allowed to be distributed in Debian.
>
> Also, could this
uot;
+ "MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
See the GNU\n"
+"Library General Public License for more details.\n"
+"\n"
+"You should have received a copy of the GNU Library
General Public\n"
+
On Jul 25, 2011 4:28 PM, "Mark Hymers" wrote:
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I've REJECTed your package for the following reasons:
>
> * common/x86/x86inc.asm is licensed under MIT: please add this to the
copyright
> file
>
> * extras/stdint.h is public domain: please add this info to the copyright
fil
Has there been any work on transitioning to libav-0.7?
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia
On Jun 24, 2011 10:17 AM, "Sven Mueller" wrote:
>
> On Fri, June 24, 2011 10:29 am, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > I've CC'ed both Sven and Leonard explicitly, because both do not seem to
> > be subscribed to pkg-multimedia. Sven, Leonard, are you (still?)
> > interested in participating in pkg-multi
On Jun 19, 2011 12:51 PM, "Felipe Sateler" wrote:
>
> Is there going to be another try at including lame into debian? Last
> time was rejected due to concerns over the LGPL license and added
> restrictions:
>
>
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2011-April/017869.h
"You should have received a copy of the GNU Library General
Public\n"
+ "License along with this program. If not, see\n"
+"<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.\n");
return 0;
}
Note the single space at the end of the patch.
Also, somet
usage, it is possible to add the path of one of the
wrapper to /etc/ld.so.preload.
For more details about the issue, please see:
http://bugs.debian.org/625521
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12518
-- Aurelien Jarno Wed, 11 May 2011 22:15:31 +0200
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
ot;
-" button in some pull down menu within the executable
of your program.\n" "\n");
-fprintf(fp,
- "4. If you determine that distribution of LAME requires a
patent license,\n"
-" you must obtain such license.\n" &quo
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> 2011/5/7 Rogério Brito :
>>> My login on alioth is rbrito-guest.
>
> Added, welcome aboard!
>
> --
> Alessio Treglia | www.ales
2011/5/7 Rogério Brito :
> Hi there, Andres.
>
> On May 06 2011, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> I'm sending this mail to you outside of lame-dev. If you want to help
>> with Debian packaging, you should start by taking a look at [1]. Just
>> so you know, it's not cle
help out anyway.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
1. http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/Join
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
functions provided in LAME use the mpglib decoding
engine which\n"
-"is under the GPL. They may not be used by any program not
released under the\n"
-"GPL unless you obtain such permission from the MPG123 project
(www.mpg123.de).\
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-05-06 at 04:55pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> > On 11-05-06 at 04:31pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> >> + "This library is free software;
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-05-06 at 04:31pm, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> + "This library is free software; you can redistribute it
>> and/or\n"
>> + "modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General P
be redistributed
as-is I believe. However, I think it's best not to give legal
interpretations of the LGPL and instead simply give the generic LGPL
header information.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
Description: Patch to simply print LGPL licence header when using lame --license
--- lame-3.98.4.orig/fr
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Mark Taylor wrote:
>> Hi Andres,
>>
>> I'd be happy to just delete this text from the README.
>>
>> Not sure if my sourceforge account will still work. It would be
>
were the only person to introduce these changes,
>> this is why I am sending you this lengthy message via
>> sourceforge.net's messaging system. If you agree to have
>> these modifications to the LGPL dropped for LAME, could you
>> send a message to the current
On Apr 28, 2011 3:45 AM, "Alessio Treglia" wrote:
>
> Hello Andres,
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> > Would any DD here be so kind as to upload the updated version of
libbluray
> > from the git repos to unstable?
>
> uploadin
Hello,
Would any DD here be so kind as to upload the updated version of libbluray
from the git repos to unstable? It introduces two new packages and there has
been no decision as to whether I'm approved to be a DD or not, thus I can't
upload it myself.
--
Regards,
An
I'd say let's begin with these packages. IIRC, adi mentioned the desire
> to provide quicker backports of jack-ish packages as well, so this might
> be a use-case as well.
>
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:15:40 (CET), Andres Mejia wrote:
>
>>> Because we now these
t; further steps.
>
> --
> Gruesse/greetings,
> Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
>
> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
>
--
segmentation fault in faad due to an incorrect pointer size
(Closes: #603807, LP: #665802).
* Add gbp config file.
[ Andres Mejia ]
* Revert changes in 2.7-5. Upload of 2.7-5 was unintentionally done.
* Refresh patches.
-- Andres Mejia Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:17:36 -0500
Changes done in
.
[ Andres Mejia ]
* Revert changes in 2.7-5. Upload of 2.7-5 was unintentionally done.
* Refresh patches.
-- Andres Mejia Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:17:36 -0500
Changes done in 2.7-5 were all reverted, since it was uploaded
unintentionally. Here is a diff for the changes from 2.7-4 to 2.7-6 [2
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Fabian Greffrath
> wrote:
>> Please push your packaging branch to GIT.
>>
>
> It's already there.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Andres Mejia
>
It's
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Please push your packaging branch to GIT.
>
It's already there.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debi
add
the next entry which explains that changes in 2.7-5 is being reverted.
Also, since squeeze hasn't been released yet, we should just request a
freeze exception. A freeze exception request should be done anyway
since faad2 provides a library.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
__
LGPL.
Other than that, packages in the NEW queue are getting low priority anyway
because of work underway to deliver a new release of Debian.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alio
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 20:14:35 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> > This driver is already available in mainline Linux. Check the Linux
> > source tree under 'drivers/staging/crystalhd'. The drivers provided here
> > a
glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
s after a build, not during cleaning of a
package where the package is cleaned first, then patches are unapplied. This
will break packages which patch the build system to fix cleaning issues.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mai
-maint/crystalhd.git
Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/crystalhd.git
Also, this package will be for both the library and drivers now. The drivers
will be provided using DKMS.
--
Regards,
Andres Mejia
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers
debhelper.mk. It was not
documented cdbs-doc, so I had to actually look at the source to figure this
out.
This reminds me. I should now report a bug to CDBS about this.
1.
http://bzr.debian.org/scm/loggerhead/pkg-chromium/chromium-browser/chromium-browser.sid/annotate/head:/debian/rules
>
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 03:18:50PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>>
&
4/uqHUFJ0pbXBrN7H2oje0VuHH5PB
> +rSNpZoIkNZV5dfkfVHy
> =ijzO
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> _______
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman
On Tuesday 17 August 2010 17:09:25 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 03:40:37PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
> >On Monday 16 August 2010 06:32:59 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:19:40 (CEST), Andres Mejia wrote:
> >> > On T
On Monday 16 August 2010 06:32:59 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:19:40 (CEST), Andres Mejia wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 August 2010 23:38:09 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 14:39:19 (EDT), Andres Mejia wrote:
> >> > Is t
On Tuesday 10 August 2010 23:38:09 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 14:39:19 (EDT), Andres Mejia wrote:
> > Is there any progress with getting libcrystalhd2 into Debian? I would
> > like to help if that's alright.
>
> just curious, is this a driver pack
at debconf 10, yes, Jonas and I had (at least one?) long
> >real-life conversation about cdbs. It's not that I really disklike it
> >or something, au contraire, I do think that cdbs does have benefit for
> >some groups of packages. E.g. I know that the gnome and k
Just so you know, I've started some packaging work myself. This packaging is
based off of packaging work already done by XBMC devs.
Check [1] for packaging work done.
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/crystalhd.git
On Tuesday 10 August 2010 14:39:19 Andres Mejia wrote:
> Hello,
101 - 200 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
