Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Thanks to both of you for your help. I'll add you as moderators shortly after the list migration. Best, Reinhard On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 5:20 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Excerpts from Reinhard Tartler's message of april 12, 2018 9:44 pm: > > Hi Dominic, > > > > Based on the

Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Hi Dominic, Based on the discussion on this list, please do migrate the pkg-multimedia-maintainers list. Sorry for the short notice. I assume that the list of current subscribers, as well as the rest of the mailman configuration, will be retained, is that right? I'm OK to continue to serve as

Re: Notice of mailing list closure: pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Hi Mattia, I am around, but am unsure what to do. Reading through the past mails on this topic on the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list, I thought the plan was to move all packages to use "debian-multime...@lists.debian.org" as maintainer, and we could safely let go of the alioth list. I

Re: Proposed multimedia team migration to salsa.d.o

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:53 AM James Cowgill wrote: > > > listmasters mentioned multiple times that they don't want something on > > l.d.o to appear in the Maintainers field. > > I don't think they said that. They said that they don't want lots of > mailing lists on

Bug#867115: smplayer crashes with "Error parsing option noquiet (option not found)"

Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 moreinfo Thank you for your bugreport. I had a look at the issue and have some questions for you. On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:09 PM Daniel 'DaB.' Baur wrote: > Package: smplayer > Version: 16.11.0~ds0-1 > Severity: grave >

Bug#864664: CVE-2017-9122 CVE-2017-9123 CVE-2017-9124 CVE-2017-9125 CVE-2017-9126 CVE-2017-9127 CVE-2017-9128

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:06 PM Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Source: libquicktime > Severity: grave > Tags: security > > Please see: > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-9122 > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-9123 >

Re: kodi on ci20 creator

Sounds good to me. Is there some friendly mips porter who could help us out here? -rt On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:06 PM James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > [+CC multimedia team] > > On 02/04/17 17:38, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Mathieu Malaterre

Bug#859216: unblock: jackd2/1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-5

+1,11 @@ +jackd2 (1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Move libjackserver into package libjack-jackd2-0. This avoids a +dangling symbolic link in the package libjack-jackd2-dev. +(Closes: #858525) + + -- Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> Mon, 27 Ma

Bug#858525: marked as pending

On 03/29/2017 06:20 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2017-03-29 03:09, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> tag 858525 pending >> thanks >> >> Hello, >> >> Bug #858525 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can >> see the changelog

Bug#858525: libjack-jackd2-dev: Depend on jackd2

On 2017-03-28 04:04, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:22:41PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I think the approach of adding a 'depends' to jackd2 is the simplest. Moving the shared library to the -dev packages doesn't work, because /usr/bin/jackd2 and netserver.so link against

Bug#858525: libjack-jackd2-dev: Depend on jackd2

tags 858525 patch stop Hi, I think the approach of adding a 'depends' to jackd2 is the simplest. Moving the shared library to the -dev packages doesn't work, because /usr/bin/jackd2 and netserver.so link against it. The downside of this patch is that every package that depends on

Bug#834953: ams: Should this package be removed?

Package: ams Severity: normal Hi, The package "ams" hasn't seen an upstream release since April 2014 (cf. http://alsamodular.sourceforge.net/). The last upload to debian was on 2014-04-12. It currently has one RC bug, and if I read popcon correctly, 46 installations:

Re: Wheezy update of vlc?

On 2016-05-29 13:53, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Hello dear maintainer(s), the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Wheezy version of vlc: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-5108 Would you like to take care of this yourself? If

Bug#794817: Should mplayer2 be removed from unstable?

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:21 PM Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org wrote: On 2015-08-06 23:05:58, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: Package: mplayer2 Severity: serious I think mplayer2 should be removed because: * It is dead upstream (even the homepage is gone). * mplayer is back in

Bug#794578: mplayer2: undefined symbol in libavcodec-ffmpeg

It appears that you have a local copy of libmp3lame in /usr/local/lib, which is most likely the culprit. Please remove that local copy and try again. Does the problem persist? Best, Reinhard On Tue, Aug 4, 2015, 2:54 PM Alex Bernier alex.bern...@free.fr wrote: On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at

Re: Bug#793085: ffmpeg: removal of ffmpeg makes files disappear from libav-tools

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015, 4:51 AM Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote: Package: ffmpeg Version: 7:2.7.2-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts replaces-without-breaks Control: affects -1 + libav-tools Hi, during a test with piuparts and DOSE tools I noticed your

Re: Uploading ffmpeg 2.7.2-1

did you already coordinate this transition with the release team? What is the transition tracking bug? We must not start a transition of this size without coordination, in particular given that we are aware of a couple of FTBFS. This all needs the be documented first before we can proceed with

Re: Uploading ffmpeg 2.7.2-1

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:59 AM Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 20.07.2015 13:48, Reinhard Tartler wrote: did you already coordinate this transition with the release team? Yes. What is the transition tracking bug? #792619 [1], see also the transition

Re: libav and FFmpeg: switch over

Keeping the libavcodec-extra packages makes very much sense to me, thank you. Do you need help with uploading to experiemental? As soon as it is in experimental, we can start with filing bugs tracking FTBFS issues in application packages. As usual, I'd suggest tracking them with usertags, so that

Bug#790918: libav-tools: bitrate 448 is not allowed in mp2 / convert to pal dvd with mp2 audio

The patch in the referenced ticket should only have any effect if you used the (deprecated) argument -ab, which the command line in your original report does not use. To be honest, I cannot see how the patch can possibly fix the command invocation that you show. Are you absolutely sure that the

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, 7:15 PM Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 18.06.2015 18:57, Bálint Réczey wrote: 2015-06-09 21:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: I have now implemented this and it works fine. It's in the extra branch of the

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Jun 18, 2015 7:15 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 18.06.2015 18:57, Bálint Réczey wrote: 2015-06-09 21:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com: I have now implemented this and it works fine. It's in the extra branch of the

Re: Audacity 2.0.6-2 several GUI problems due to wxWidgets 3.x

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:47 PM Peter P. peterpar...@fastmail.com wrote: Hi, thanks for maintaining and developing the audacity package! I am on Debian/testing and just upgraded to audacity version 2.0.6 using apt. I just noticed two new problems: 1.) The 'device bar' is suddenly empty,

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Reinhard, On 06.06.2015 20:30, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: The problem is that Debian users must be allowed to redistribute

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: The problem is that Debian users must be allowed to redistribute it, but as far as I understand it, it is not allowed to distribute e.g. a live DVD with hedgewars and libavcodec-extra installed. I also pointed this out

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

[short answer, I'm on the run] On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: I had considered producing optimized flavors, but I came to the conclusion that it would complicate debian/rules without much benefit, because the flavors are mostly

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: and would rather propose to just rename the current libav source package to ffmpeg and package the latest ffmpeg source tarball. Then that ffmpeg source package would take over the binary package names

Re: multiple uploaders

On Jun 1, 2015 7:11 AM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On 31 May 2015 at 19:36, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: IMO, if there is no need for team commitment, then there is no need for the package to be under team maintenance in the first place. In this case, it really

Re: multiple uploaders

On Jun 1, 2015 1:35 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@debian.org wrote: And by the current rule, would libav still qualify as being pkg-multimedia team-maintained? I would say yes: Most recently, Sebastian has not only provided commits, but even uploaded several packages to both unstable and

Re: multiple uploaders

Hi Ross, On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Ross Gammon r...@the-gammons.net wrote: On 05/31/2015 02:58 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Well, it really boils down what we want the team's reputation to be. The rule tests whether or not there is *team* commitment, and for that you need *more than one

Re: multiple uploaders

On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Ross Gammon r...@the-gammons.net wrote: If someone suggests a new package is brought into the team, and it is accepted, then the team is making a commitment at that point. How can you determine team commitment if only a single person is working on the

Re: multiple uploaders

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On 26 May 2015 at 09:38, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org wrote: On 2015-05-26 14:33:41, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: hmm, nobody ever answered to this email. mira's recent mail regarding a 2nd

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Hi Dmitry, 2015-05-29 12:22 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org: Thanks for insight into upstream security situation, Balint. So what would be the next step? Mass bug filings? Shall we draft a template

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On May 15, 2015 4:56 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Reinhard, thanks for explaining your point of view here. On 15.05.2015 09:23, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Thanks for this insightful post, Dmitry, On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Dmitry Smirnov only

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Please excuse my previous unfinished reply, it was sent in accident. I'm not sure if this post really adds to this discussion, please consider it as clarifications to my previous post. On May 15, 2015 4:56 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun I think security is not a decisive topic where either project

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

Thanks for this insightful post, Dmitry, On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, 9 May 2015 16:00:49 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: What would you count as very compelling reasons if more features, less bugs and better security support are not sufficient?

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

as I really need to hear an opinion from the libav's current maintainer, Reinhard Tartler. I genuinely believe that we all need to hear an opinion from him before taking any further action. Thanks for copying me on this email. It seems that I was automatically unsubscribed from that email on May

Bug#781812: libav

Control: forwarded -1 libav-d...@lists.libav.org Hi Mathieu, I would appreciate if in future you could provide a bit more details when reassigning bugs. The quote below was all that I had to start working on this issue, which is terse. My understanding of this we are talking about a curious

Bug#775593: Bug#773626: libav: multiple security issues

Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.libav.org/show_bug.cgi?id=805 On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Probably asking FFmpeg upstream would help, maybe Libav upstream also have been notified about the details. Great idea. I've forwarded this bug to

Bug#775593: Bug#773626: libav: multiple security issues

Control: severity -1 important On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org wrote: On 2014-12-20 23:31:11, Michael Gilbert wrote: CVE-2014-8544[4]: | libavcodec/tiff.c in FFmpeg before 2.4.2 does not properly validate | bits-per-pixel fields, which allows remote

Libav v11.2

Today, we update our release series 11 with the release of Libav v11.2. This release contains several security and bug fixes. This release contains many potentially security-relevant corrections. For details, please refer to the verbose Changelog file at

Bug#738760: libav: Add proper raspberry pi CPU detection

On January 6, 2015 8:16:51 AM EST, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org wrote: Control: tags -1 + patch Hi Peter On 2015-01-03 22:36:13, peter green wrote: Sebastian Ramacher wrote: there was a request to change the handling of the Raspberry Pi in the libav package. Could you please

Bug#773055: Fwd: Bug#773055: libav-tools: avconv -target pal-svcd fails with Unable to parse option value scan_offset

Control: forwarded -1 libav-de...@libav.org Hi, This looks like an easy target to fix. Can someone have a look at this? Is this critical and applicable for earlier releases as well? Best, Reinhard -- Forwarded message -- From: Andreas Weber andy.weber...@gmail.com Date: Sat,

Bug#771126: libav/tests/lena.pnm: also not mentioned in debian/copyright

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: Control: tags -1 -wheezy-ignore On 2014-11-27 23:23, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Niels Thykier (2014-11-27 22:14:25) [...] In prior similar bugreport https://bugs.debian.org/760171#10 - referenced from

Help with backporting Libav patches

Hi folks, Luca, who is doing most of the security work these days in Libav, asks which releases we need to support. To the best of my knowledge, this would in Debian and Ubuntu: release/0.8: wheezy, precise release/9: trusty release/11: jessie, utopic, vivid AFAIUI, we can safely retire

Bug#771126: libav/tests/lena.pnm: also not mentioned in debian/copyright

In order to address this, I've proposed to replace lena.pnm with a new image, taken by me, at https://github.com/libav/libav/pull/17 I don't really care about the licensing. Is the declaration in the commit message OK? How to declare that in debian/copyright? -- regards, Reinhard

Bug#771126: libav/tests/lena.pnm: also not mentioned in debian/copyright

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Hi Reinhard, Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2014-11-27 18:35:05) In order to address this, I've proposed to replace lena.pnm with a new image, taken by me, at https://github.com/libav/libav/pull/17 Fun idea :-) I don't

Bug#770665: libxvidcore4: Xvideo not working

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. herminio.hernande...@gmail.com wrote: When I was running Ubuntu and Xubuntu this was not an issue. I just yesterday moved to Debian Jesse. Below are my specs rican-linux@debian-ppc:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 cpu : 7447A, altivec

Re: Bug#770665: libxvidcore4: Xvideo not working

have been added with another device file. rican-linux@debian-ppc:~$ Best, Reinhard On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. herminio.hernande...@gmail.com wrote: When I was running Ubuntu

Re: x264-10bit wrapper script

On Nov 20, 2014 12:41 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: [changed subject line] Hi Julian, Am Mittwoch, den 19.11.2014, 20:01 + schrieb Julian Cable: Perhaps you can just say: This wrapper script has no options. thanks again! I improved the wording as you suggested.

Re: faad2 and faac

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: Hey Julian, I've just tested your approach with the faad2 package and it works just as expected. I'll add the necessary changes to the Debian packaging soon [tm]. But please note that we are not in a hurry: testing

Re: Ardour FTBFS hurd-i386

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-10-21 10:45 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com: Hi, ardour FTBFS on hurd-i386 Should we build it only linux-any kfreebsd-any ? https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ardoursuite=unstable

Bug#742896: Blank screen on all videos with VDPAU and nVidia card (xbmc)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Wojciech Kuranowski wojci...@kuranowski.pl wrote: Yes, VDPAU acceleration fails with the latest package [xbmc with Anton's patch compiled against libav]. But it's a bit better than before, because I have one example of working movie which was not working with

Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW, I personally think we should not mention any of lame, xvidcore, x264 or mplayer2. All of these packages are already in stable, so

Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Alessandro Ghedini gh...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 07:01:09PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: Folks, If you want to add some last bits, please do it by tomorrow morning, I updated the mplayer2 section and added mplayer to the dropped section (I

Bug#764169: libav-tools: can transcode but not copy Speex audio from Matroska container

Control: Tag -1 upstream On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Package: libav-tools Version: 6:11-1 Severity: normal Speex audio in Matroska container behaves oddly: Codec needs to be explicitly declared, even though avconv lists the codec in extracted

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: I would also like to add that since Libav and FFmpeg offer different features they are different enough to consider them as alternates which have the place in Debian on their own right. This is the part that makes me

Re: RFS: chromaprint 1.2-1

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Simon Chopin chopin.si...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd love it if someone (Reinhard ?) would upload the new version of chromaprint sitting in the eponymous pkg-multimedia git repo. As usual, I haven't updated the changelog in case there are still some changes

Re: RFS: chromaprint 1.2-1

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Simon Chopin chopin.si...@gmail.com wrote: Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2014-09-28 20:58:00) On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Simon Chopin chopin.si...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd love it if someone (Reinhard ?) would upload the new version of chromaprint

Bug#762492: libav-tools: Audio/video encoding produces an audio encoding error with openshot/kdenlive

Control: tag -1 upstream Thank you for your bug report. On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Charles Laws charles.debian.bug.repo...@gmail.com wrote: Package: libav-tools Version: 6:11-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, My last video project was about 7 weeks ago. Sometime between then

Bug#760763: fixed in libav 6:11~beta1-3

Control: reopen -1 Control: tag -1 help On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: Package: libav-tools Version: 6:11-1 Followup-For: Bug #760763 On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 13:20 +, Reinhard Tartler wrote: * Remove /etc/avserver.conf (Closes: #760763) This does

Bug#749659: audacity + wxWidgets 3.0 — Proposing patch

? That would be very useful - then it will be clearer exactly what the currently proposed changes are. On 09/09/2014 01:19 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Can you maybe attach a debdiff, please? (BTW, I wouldn't mind a NMU) Please find attached a debdiff including the currently proposed version

Bug#760433: libav: FTBFS on x32: Invalid inline assembly

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Daniel Schepler dschep...@gmail.com wrote: Source: libav Version: 6:11~beta1-2 Severity: important Justification: blocker for kde builds X-Debbugs-CC: Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de When I try building libav in an x32 schroot (without the build dependencies

Bug#749659: audacity + wxWidgets 3.0 — Proposing patch

On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Olly Betts o...@survex.com wrote: Control: severity -1 serious On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:12:37PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I wonder what's the status of this bug. The most recent email did not help to clarify, so I test-compiled wx3.0.patch as proposed

Bug#702762: Fwd: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

would you recommend to use for the Debian package? Is it useful to have libpostproc in Debian? (see also the backlog of this bug). Please advise. Thanks On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote

Bug#760763: libav-tools: conffiles not removed

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: Package: libav-tools Version: 6:11~beta1-2 Severity: normal Usertags: conffile User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly. Please

Bug#749659: audacity + wxWidgets 3.0 — Proposing patch

Control: tag -1 -patch Control: severity -1 normal Hi, I wonder what's the status of this bug. The most recent email did not help to clarify, so I test-compiled wx3.0.patch as proposed in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749659#35, and can confirm that the package builds fine.

Bug#760763: libav-tools: conffiles not removed

AFAIUI, I should add a debian/libav-tools.maintscript with the following content: rm_conffile /etc/avserver.conf 6:10.2-1~ Does this sound good to you? -- regards, Reinhard ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Bug#760639: mplayer2: PGS subtitle format won't appear

Control: tag -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 u...@mplayer2.org On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Axel Angel axel-...@vneko.ch wrote: Package: mplayer2 Version: 2.0-728-g2c378c7-2+b2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, [...] Playing videos (eg: mkv) containing correctly recognized S_HDMV/PGS

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: Hi Reinhard On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: At the end of the day, I need a source tarball that contains maintained sources of a stand-alone libpostproc. I don't care too much how it is created, as long as it doesn't result in code-duplication with existing

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Hi, as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not test it (for lack of a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote: On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Hi

Bug#758543: fixed in libdvdnav 5.0.1-1

On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Fufu Fang fangfufu2...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Maintainer, The problem is still there. I have upgraded to 5.0.1-1, I still can't run mplayer. The error message is still the same. I checked the file list (https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libdvdnav4/filelist),

Bug#759866: Please package version 5.0.1

Package: libdvdnav 21:23 j-b and I did a libdvdnav 5.0.1 to fix a crash 21:26 j-b https://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/libdvdnav-devel/2014-August/000222.html [libdvdnav] [branch: refs/tags/5.0.1] Tag:916101a1ec4b50d929cb1fd5729764f4b1a1657e

Bug#759866: Please package version 5.0.1

On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: Package: libdvdnav 21:23 j-b and I did a libdvdnav 5.0.1 to fix a crash 21:26 j-b https://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/libdvdnav-devel/2014-August/000222.html [libdvdnav] [branch: refs/tags/5.0.1] Tag

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Aug 27, 2014 10:43 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2014, 09:52 +0200 schrieb Matteo F. Vescovi: Libav for me, of course. I am for libav for the next stable release. However, I am open for anything else after that. To be honest, I recently find the

Re: Bug#757917: transition: libav11

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: On 18/08/14 21:33, Andrew Kelley wrote: On Aug 18, 2014 12:22 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: I want to get perl in first. Ping me again when that happens if I haven't replied. Pardon my

Re: Bug#757917: transition: libav11

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: On 26/08/14 16:05, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: On 18/08/14 21:33, Andrew Kelley wrote: On Aug 18, 2014 12:22 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote: Hi, there was a discussion on the debian-devel mailing list about reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian [1]. The security team made clear [2] that they will only support one provider of the libav* libraries. So either libav or

Bug#759199: mencoder: depends on libdvdnavmini.so.4 which is not found

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Stuart Prescott stu...@debian.org wrote: Control: reassign -1 libdvdnav4 Control: forcemerge 758543 -1 Hi Marco, thanks for your report -- unfortunately mencoder is not available for sid at all as it has been removed from the archive. The package you have

Bug#759199: mencoder: depends on libdvdnavmini.so.4 which is not found

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Stuart Prescott stu...@debian.org wrote: How about adding to libdvdnav4: Breaks: mplayer ( 2:1.0), mencoder ( 2:1.0) it tells apt that the packages are broken by the new libdvdnav4 package and apt will act accordingly. The version restriction is

Re: git-packaging workflows

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: Resurrecting an old thread On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Recently, Russ' blog post was echoed on http://planet.debian.org: http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/journal/2013

Re: vlc/vlc-nox distinction

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org wrote: (Dropping J-B from CC. I think this is purely Debian related now.) On 2014-08-18 22:37:42, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: On 2014-08-17 23:22:02, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: On 16 Aug, Reinhard Tartler wrote : I

Re: Bug#757917: transition: libav11

On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: vlc FAIL (silly configure check fail, will sort out with upstream) Turns out to be sligtly more complicated as thought. After consultation with j-b (videolan upstream), we decided that we really should go with vlc

Re: vlc/vlc-nox distinction

On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf j...@videolan.org wrote: Hello, On 16 Aug, Reinhard Tartler wrote : I'm currently fighting with upgrading to VLC 2.2, and noticed that a lot of plugins were shuffled around. I noticed that I'm spending way to much time figuring out what

Re: vlc/vlc-nox distinction

On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Mateusz Łukasik mat...@linuxmint.pl wrote: +1 to drop vlc-nox, albo I think we should making samba plugin as a separate package (#729238) it is pretty unnecessary plugin installation on embedded systems. We need to go through NEW anyway, so now would be a

Re: Bug#757917: transition: libav11

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: linphone FAIL, #758017, NMU uploaded to 5/days vlc FAIL (silly configure check fail, will sort out with upstream) Turns out to be sligtly more complicated as thought. After consultation with j-b (videolan upstream

Bug#737534: vlc: unsafe use of libtar

Control: tag -1 upstream On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org wrote: Package: vlc Severity: important Tags: security Hi, vlc uses libtar to unpack skins, however, its use on untrusted data exposes it to CVE-2013-4420 (#731860). Changing the behaviour of

Bug#755749: vlc: segfault when playing .avi file

Control: tag -1 upstream moreinfo Control: severity -1 normal On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Simon Frei freisi...@gmail.com wrote: Package: vlc Version: 2.1.4-1+b3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Playing an .avi file results in seemingly random crashes at non reproducable points.

vlc/vlc-nox distinction

Hi, I'm currently fighting with upgrading to VLC 2.2, and noticed that a lot of plugins were shuffled around. I noticed that I'm spending way to much time figuring out what plugin should go to vlc and what plugin should go to vlc-nox. I wonder if having this split is really worth the effort. How

Re: vlc/vlc-nox distinction

On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm currently fighting with upgrading to VLC 2.2, and noticed that a lot of plugins were shuffled around. I noticed that I'm spending way to much time figuring out what plugin should go to vlc and what plugin

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Matthias Urlichs matth...@urlichs.de wrote: Hi, Jean-Yves Avenard: Including rename of constants (code enums id for example). Another nail in libav's coffin, then. That's one way to see it. To me, this makes mythtv unsuitable for inclusion into Debian. Let

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Matthias Urlichs matth...@urlichs.de wrote: Hi, Andreas Cadhalpun: Once FFmpeg is back in the archive, it'll be easy to reintroduce MPlayer. It has been removed from sid, since it fails to build against Libav, but it builds fine against FFmpeg. (It uses some

Bug#756648: Fwd: Bug#756648: mplayer2: add support for ppc64el

Control: forwarded -1 u...@mplayer2.org Control: tag -1 upstream Hi Uoti, The proposed patch (attached to this email) makes sense to me for inclusion into your mplayer2.git. Can you incorporate it? Thanks, Reinhard -- Forwarded message -- From: Breno Leitao bren...@br.ibm.com

Bug#756174: jackd2 building without any of the required build flags

On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Steve Langasek steve.langa...@canonical.com wrote: Package: jackd2 Version: 1.9.10+20140610git97e0e80b~dfsg-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu utopic ubuntu-patch The jackd2 package in Debian

Bug#756174: jackd2 building without any of the required build flags

On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2014-07-27 16:24:11) Given that this support is not in place, I wonder if CDBS is the best helper infrastructure for this package. I don't follow your logic here, Reinhard. CDBS _does_ have

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: * Does it make sense for me to switch my package? The rule of thumb is, if your upstream uses FFmpeg for development you probably want to switch to using it, too. In [1], Moritz from the security

Bug#755540: libav: FTBFS on ppc64el architecture

Control: tag -1 -patch +moreinfo Hi Breno, On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Breno Leitao bren...@br.ibm.com wrote: I am attaching a patch to disable altivec on ppc64el at the moment. Ubuntu is also using the same

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >