Re: Bug#654984: libav: Please use a less confusing package name

2012-01-13 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 11.01.2012 01:19, schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos: libav is just one of several FFmpeg forks, all forks share several security issues and many known bugs and regressions not present in FFmpeg, see the FFmpeg bug tracker for details Schily?! ;) ___

Re: Bug#654984: libav: Please use a less confusing package name

2012-01-12 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at at.or.at writes: I'm not really convinced by 'avtools' and 'avutils', as both seem pretty generic to me. 'libav' was chosen to follow the name change of the project 'ffmpeg'-'libav'. To clarify: There was no name change, the FFmpeg project is active

Re: Bug#654984: libav: Please use a less confusing package name

2012-01-11 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Jan 10, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: Reinhard Tartler siretart at gmail.com writes: I'm not really convinced by 'avtools' and 'avutils', as both seem pretty generic to me. 'libav' was chosen to follow the name change of the project 'ffmpeg'-'libav'. To clarify: There

Re: Bug#654984: libav: Please use a less confusing package name

2012-01-10 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Reinhard Tartler siretart at gmail.com writes: I'm not really convinced by 'avtools' and 'avutils', as both seem pretty generic to me. 'libav' was chosen to follow the name change of the project 'ffmpeg'-'libav'. To clarify: There was no name change, the FFmpeg project is active with no name

Re: Bug#654984: libav: Please use a less confusing package name

2012-01-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-01-07 21:47, Paul Gevers wrote: It was specifically design for migration purposes. Still, you might want to update the dependencies for your package and update it to use '/usr/bin/avconf' instead of '/usr/bin/ffmpeg'. If I understand

Bug#654984: libav: Please use a less confusing package name

2012-01-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:01 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-01-07 21:47, Paul Gevers wrote: It was specifically design for migration purposes. Still, you might want to update the dependencies for your package and update

Bug#654984: libav: Please use a less confusing package name

2012-01-07 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote: Package: libav Version: 4:0.8~beta1-2 Severity: wishlist Hi! There's now a libav binary package in experimental, which ffmpeg transitions to (due to the upstream change). The thing is that I initially got pretty

Bug#654984: libav: Please use a less confusing package name

2012-01-07 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 19:03:23 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote: Package: libav Version: 4:0.8~beta1-2 Severity: wishlist There's now a libav binary package in experimental, which ffmpeg transitions to (due to the

Bug#654984: libav: Please use a less confusing package name

2012-01-07 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl wrote: Then let's go with 'libav-tools', unless someone objects that is. Just to be sure, we are talking about the binaries here right? As the source name seems fine with me and is no problem, right? I don't think users would

Bug#654984: libav: Please use a less confusing package name

2012-01-07 Thread Paul Gevers
Then let's go with 'libav-tools', unless someone objects that is. Just to be sure, we are talking about the binaries here right? As the source name seems fine with me and is no problem, right? I don't think users would understand this name any better than ffmpeg, but I think the lib start

Bug#654984: libav: Please use a less confusing package name

2012-01-07 Thread fabian
'/usr/bin/avconf' instead of '/usr/bin/ffmpeg'. s/avconf/avconv/ that is. ;) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org