Re: Thoughts on pd object packaging - use of cdbs might be preferable?

2010-11-12 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 11/11/2010 08:30 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I'd like to have my packages work on all Debian platforms, but I have never worked with hurd or kfreebsd, nor have had any feedback that there are problems. As far as I can tell, my packages build on all Debian platforms. just call

Re: Thoughts on pd object packaging - use of cdbs might be preferable?

2010-11-12 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:43 AM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote: On 11/11/2010 08:30 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I'd like to have my packages work on all Debian platforms, but I have never worked with hurd or kfreebsd, nor have had any feedback that there are problems. As far as I can tell, my

Re: Thoughts on pd object packaging - use of cdbs might be preferable?

2010-11-12 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 11/12/2010 06:10 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Ah yes, still learning my way around all the Debian tools, they are pretty large. A common snippet would be great, no argument here. so now, we only have to do it :-) About the HURD/kFreeBSD issue, it seems to be a linking issue, do we

Re: Thoughts on pd object packaging - use of cdbs might be preferable?

2010-11-12 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Nov 12, 2010, at 12:30 PM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote: On 11/12/2010 06:10 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Ah yes, still learning my way around all the Debian tools, they are pretty large. A common snippet would be great, no argument here. so now, we only have to do it :-) About the

Re: Thoughts on pd object packaging - use of cdbs might be preferable?

2010-11-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:18:44PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 20:27 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: Given that most pd libraries use the same template, I think we can leverage the use of cdbs here: 1. We ship (eg, in puredata-dev) a standard-pd-object.mk CDBS class

Re: Thoughts on pd object packaging - use of cdbs might be preferable?

2010-11-11 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I'd like to have my packages work on all Debian platforms, but I have never worked with hurd or kfreebsd, nor have had any feedback that there are problems. As far as I can tell, my packages build on all Debian platforms. All I can say is: patches welcome. .hc On Nov 11, 2010, at 3:49

Thoughts on pd object packaging - use of cdbs might be preferable?

2010-11-10 Thread Felipe Sateler
Given that most pd libraries use the same template, I think we can leverage the use of cdbs here: 1. We ship (eg, in puredata-dev) a standard-pd-object.mk CDBS class which includes the snippets needed for the shlibdeps and license fiddling, and the makefile class. 2. rules files then become