On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 23:11:58 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
AK If you don't fear the lack of Debian-wide testing, go ahead and upload
AK 1.9.5 to unstable. The users would probably appreciate this.
I'm gonna do that.
Will this require rebuilds or other changes to packages in the
Hi Reinhard,
|--== On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:13:12 +0100, Reinhard Tartler
siret...@tauware.de said:
RT On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 23:30:56 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
Hi,
|--== On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator
instal...@ftp-master.debian.org said:
AA Reject
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28:42PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
Hi Reinhard,
|--== On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:13:12 +0100, Reinhard Tartler
siret...@tauware.de said:
RT On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 23:30:56 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
|--== On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28:42 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
RT there is currently a vote on this ongoing right now...
I'm sorry, I think I missed it, can you point me to it?
hm. it seems the message at
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:26, Free Ekanayaka fr...@debian.org wrote:
So, my opinion is that we should definitely have jack2 in squeeze,
because it seems to be better (that is more features, and as stable as
jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well.
I see no such thing on
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:26:01PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
So, my opinion is that we should definitely have jack2 in squeeze,
because it seems to be better (that is more features, and as stable as
jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well. FWIW I've
been
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:34:07PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
[jackd2 over jackd1]
jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well.
I see no such thing on their webpage, nor in their mailing list
(although I don't pay that much attention there).
This was also new to me. I
Hi,
|--== On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:53:15 +0100, Adrian Knoth
a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de said:
AK On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:34:07PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
AK [jackd2 over jackd1]
jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well.
I see no such thing on their webpage,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:11:58PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
AK* audio.conf handling. Right now, it cannot be tweaked by the user.
AK Sure it can, but the package will overwrite it on updates. Though
AK this will be fine in almost all cases (we provide a sensible
AK
Hi,
|--== On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator
instal...@ftp-master.debian.org said:
AA Reject Reasons:
AA Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have
'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most recent version (1.9.4+svn3842-2)
I can sponsor this upload to
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 23:30:56 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
Hi,
|--== On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator
instal...@ftp-master.debian.org said:
AA Reject Reasons:
AA Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have
'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:30:56PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
AA Reject Reasons:
AA Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have
'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most recent version (1.9.4+svn3842-2)
I can sponsor this upload to experimental. However I'm wondering if we
Reject Reasons:
Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes'
in its most recent version (1.9.4+svn3842-2)
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
13 matches
Mail list logo
