On Fr, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:16:58 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 08.02.2011 13:41, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
>> I have updated (and simplified) the documentation with regard to our
>> modifications to the upstream tarball. However, both
>> README.upstream-upgrade and get-orig-source.sh have ~rc
Am 08.02.2011 13:41, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
I have updated (and simplified) the documentation with regard to our
modifications to the upstream tarball. However, both
README.upstream-upgrade and get-orig-source.sh have ~rc3 hardcoded and
I am not quite sure (i.e. not involved enough and not goi
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 04:12:05PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Di, Feb 08, 2011 at 14:13:37 (CET), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:41:15PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 07.02.2011 19:15, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Oh, I'm sorry, it seems I've drifted into too much u
On Di, Feb 08, 2011 at 14:13:37 (CET), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:41:15PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>>Am 07.02.2011 19:15, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>>> Oh, I'm sorry, it seems I've drifted into too much upstream work so
>>> that I overlook such important packaging c
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:41:15PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 07.02.2011 19:15, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Oh, I'm sorry, it seems I've drifted into too much upstream work so
that I overlook such important packaging changes. Help of course as
always welcome.
Never mind...
The only chan
Am 07.02.2011 19:15, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Oh, I'm sorry, it seems I've drifted into too much upstream work so that
I overlook such important packaging changes. Help of course as always
welcome.
Never mind...
The only change from the upstream tarballs is the removal of the
libdvdcss/ dire
On Mo, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:12:03 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Er... I just tried to find out what the reason for the .dfsg1 suffix in
> our package version is, i.e. what is actualy removed from the Debian
> tarball WRT the upstream tarball. It seems the information that is
> puzzled across READ
Er... I just tried to find out what the reason for the .dfsg1 suffix
in our package version is, i.e. what is actualy removed from the
Debian tarball WRT the upstream tarball. It seems the information that
is puzzled across README.source, README.upstream-upgrade,
get-orig-source.sh and strip.sh
Accepted:
mencoder_1.0~rc4.dfsg1-1_i386.deb
to main/m/mplayer/mencoder_1.0~rc4.dfsg1-1_i386.deb
mplayer-dbg_1.0~rc4.dfsg1-1_i386.deb
to main/m/mplayer/mplayer-dbg_1.0~rc4.dfsg1-1_i386.deb
mplayer-doc_1.0~rc4.dfsg1-1_all.deb
to main/m/mplayer/mplayer-doc_1.0~rc4.dfsg1-1_all.deb
mplayer-gui_
